How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact asymptotic and orbit package for the IK criterion
Definition
Fix a smooth connected orientable paracompact boundaryless, time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold and a smooth Killing field , with the stationary Lorentzian conventions. The IK AF package consists of an open end , with coordinates , , , and , , , where the constant is the mass parameter (distinct from the manifold denoted by the same letter).
Here means in the fixed spatial chart: some and finite satisfy for all , componentwise for an array. The metric remainders are independent of because is Killing, so the same bounds hold for every , uniformly over spatial angular directions and time. No differentiated decay is asserted by this unindexed notation.
Set , using chronological reachability in . Require an embedded spacelike section agreeing with on the end. Denote its unique smooth future unit normal by , so , and for .
For each , let be the unique maximal integral curve of with . Require every such orbit to be complete, meaning , and to meet . Require also on . These requirements are assumptions, not consequences of mere stationarity or leading asymptotic decay.
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
The stationary Lorentzian data specify the smooth metric, time orientation, Killing equation and local-flow conventions. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
The chronological exterior is the intersection of chronological past and future computed in the specified ambient manifold; a spacelike hypersurface has positive-definite induced metric. Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
The fixed-chart decay interface with defines by a common radius and componentwise constants, uniformly over spatial angular directions. Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
In a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, an embedded spacelike hypersurface has a unique future unit normal, smooth along the hypersurface. Only parts (a)–(b) of the normal lemma are used. The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
A smooth vector field has a unique maximal integral curve through each point, normalized at parameter zero. Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve
Justification
Given: The manifold, field, end chart and spacelike section specified in the Definition.
1.1 The chronological operations determine in the ambient manifold. The normal lemma applies to the time-oriented Lorentzian manifold and embedded spacelike section, giving the stated unique smooth . The maximal-integral-curve theorem applies to the smooth on , so and intersection with are unambiguous additional predicates for each . Nonvanishing of is the separately imposed transversality condition; no existence of an AF package or completeness theorem is asserted. [given, F1, F2, F4, F5]
2.1 In the end chart the local flow of sends to . Differentiating its metric pullback at by the Lie-derivative definition gives . Thus each metric remainder has the same value at as at . Applying the decay convention to the time-zero remainder gives the same radius and constants for all , exactly the ordinary bounds defined above. The package therefore specifies definite data and predicates without deriving any of its existence or orbit assumptions from the asymptotic estimates. [given, F1, F3, step 1.1] ∎
External input
The independent Ionescu–Klainerman source supplies the AF predicates in section 1.2, equations (1.4)–(1.5), printed/PDF pp. 6–7. Only that definition package is imported; no vacuum equation, existence theorem or analytic continuation result is inferred here.
Depends on
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
- Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve
- Ionescu–Klainerman, On the uniqueness of smooth, stationary black holes in vacuum (arXiv:0711.0040v2) · Section 1.2, AF, equations (1.4)–(1.5), printed/PDF pp. 6–7, including footnote 4.
Used by · 6
- Ionescu–Klainerman local Kerr criterion with full interface
- Local Kerr rigidity and conditional global identification
- Conditional horizon recovery and Kerr implications
- Exact bifurcate-sphere package for the IK criterion
- Stationary transport of vanishing from a section
- The IK continuation also fixes one global reciprocal invariant
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The AF hypothesis specifies a stationary product end with the displayed metric component bounds and positive mass, the chronological exterior, a spacelike section matching t=0, complete stationary orbits meeting that section, and nonzero contraction of T with its future unit normal.
Hypotheses: The source introduces AF in a smooth time-oriented four-dimensional vacuum spacetime with a smooth Killing field, on a connected orientable paracompact manifold without boundary. Here only its geometric predicates are defined; neither vacuum equations nor existence of such data is deduced.
Reading limits: Consulted the PDF text of section 1.2, AF and footnote 4 on printed/PDF pp. 6–7. No image inspection, later analytic proof reconstruction, or independent proof review is claimed. The maximal-curve and unit-normal constructions use the declared mathematical suppliers; the O_0 interpretation and its time uniformity are explained locally.
Sources
- Ionescu–Klainerman, On the uniqueness of smooth, stationary black holes in vacuum (arXiv:0711.0040v2) · Section 1.2, AF, equations (1.4)–(1.5), printed/PDF pp. 6–7, including footnote 4.