Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complete volume preserving shift flow on a spherical exterior

Statement

Work in ZFC. Let C‾ be a smooth manifold with compact boundary S, diffeomorphic to {∣x∣≥1}⊂R3, and C=C‾∖S. Fix a diffeomorphism F:C‾→{∣y∣≥1}. Let h be a smooth positive definite metric up to S.

Specify an end chart: an open set E⊂C and a diffeomorphism x:E→{x∈R3:∣x∣>R0} for some R0>0, such that KR=C‾∖x−1({∣x∣>R}) is compact for every R>R0. Put r(p)=∣x(p)∣ on E. Assume h is asymptotically Euclidean in this chart: its coordinate coefficients satisfy sup⁡∣x∣≥Rmax⁡i,j∣hij(x)−δij∣→0 as R→∞. This is the metric convergence convention used here; no rate or derivative decay of h is required.

Let X be smooth up to S, tangent to S, divergence free for h, and with Xi=O(r−2) on this end. Here Xi=dxi(X), and the decay means that there are A>0 and R1>R0 with ∣Xi(p)∣≤Ar(p)−2 for all i=1,2,3 and all p∈E with r(p)≥R1. The global exterior map F supplies the boundary coordinates; x supplies the asymptotic coordinates, with their relation specified by the compact sets KR.

Then Z=−X has a complete smooth flow ψs:C→C, s∈R, by diffeomorphisms preserving the Riemannian Borel measure μh. This measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on Borel subsets contained in a bounded exterior annulus, including sets accumulating at S. Here a bounded exterior annulus is {p∈C:1<∣F(p)∣≤L} for some finite L>1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A smooth manifold with boundary uses smooth boundary charts, and smoothness up to the boundary is understood in the local-extension sense. A Riemannian metric is a smooth positive definite symmetric two-tensor, allowing boundaries with smoothness up to them. On C, a smooth vector field is a smooth tangent-bundle section; up to S its boundary-chart components admit smooth local extensions. A diffeomorphism is a bijection smooth in both directions, using the boundary smoothness convention on C‾. Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary Smooth maps between manifolds with boundary Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds

[F2]

Smooth vector fields on the boundaryless interior C have unique local smoothly dependent integral curves and unique maximal integral curves. A flow is global when its domain is R×C. Local existence, uniqueness, and smooth dependence for manifold integral curves Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve Local and global flows generated by a vector field

[F3]

Under countable choice, Riemannian volume is the locally finite Radon Borel measure with chart density m=det⁡(hij). Its divergence formula is div⁡hZ=m−1∂i(mZi). Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density Coordinate formula for riemannian divergence

[F4]

The determinant differential gives Jacobi's formula; under countable choice, nonnegative measurable functions satisfy change of variables under a C1 diffeomorphism between open subsets of Euclidean space. Work in ZFC, so countable choice is available for the vector-field formulation in [F1] and the measure and change-of-variables inputs in [F3] and this fact. The determinant differential is D det(A)[H]=tr(adj(A)H) at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the stated conclusion.

1.1givenF1F2

Use the fixed global exterior diffeomorphism F from the Statement. For u∈S2 and 0≤ρ≤ε, the map κ(u,ρ)=F−1((1+ρ)u) is a smooth product parametrization of a compact collar of S; its inverse is p↦(F(p)/∣F(p)∣,∣F(p)∣−1). This constructs the collar directly from the given diffeomorphism. Tangency gives Zρ(u,0)=0, and smoothness and compactness bound ∣∂ρ(Zρ)∣≤K on a smaller compact collar. Hence ∣Zρ(u,ρ)∣≤Kρ by integrating in ρ. Along a maximal interior integral curve, ∣d(log⁡ρ)/ds∣≤K whenever it lies in that collar. On a time interval of finite length T, each visit begins either at the initial point or at the collar edge ρ=ε, so this inequality gives a common positive lower bound for ρ throughout all such visits, in either time direction. In the specified end chart, Zr=−∑i=13Xixi/r, so ∣Zr∣≤3Ar−2 for r≥R1. Choose R>R1; this gives a bound M on ∣Zr∣ for r≥R. Integrating from the initial time or the last crossing of r=R bounds r on every finite time interval, in either time direction. Thus the segment lies in some compact KR∗. Removing the open boundary collar below the positive lower bound for ρ leaves a compact subset of C containing that segment. The collar estimate uses F, and the end estimate uses x; compactness of KR∗ combines their bounds without requiring the two charts to agree.

2.1F2step 1.1

If a maximal orbit had a finite time endpoint, step 1.1 would confine its finite-time terminal portion to a compact subset of C. Cover this compact set by finitely many local-flow neighborhoods, and take the minimum of their positive existence times after shrinking the neighborhoods. At a time sufficiently near the purported endpoint the orbit therefore extends beyond it, contradicting maximality and uniqueness. This applies forward and backward, proving completeness. Local smooth dependence, composed over finitely many local-flow intervals around any fixed finite time, makes (s,p)↦ψs(p) smooth. Uniqueness gives ψs+t=ψs∘ψt and inverse ψ−s, so every ψs is a smooth diffeomorphism.

3.1givenF3F4step 2.1

In the global exterior coordinates y=F(p) let m be the Riemannian density coefficient and put Js(y)=det⁡Dψs(y)>0, the sign being positive by continuity from the identity and invertibility from step 2.1. Differentiating the flow equation gives ∂sDψs=DZ(ψs)Dψs. Jacobi's formula and the chain rule therefore give ∂s[m(ψs(y))Js(y)]=(∂i(mZi))(ψs(y))Js(y)=0, since div⁡hZ=−div⁡hX=0. Hence m(ψs(y))Js(y)=m(y). For any Borel A⊂C, the set ψs(A) is Borel because ψs is a homeomorphism. Apply the nonnegative measurable change-of-variables theorem to 1ψs(A)m. It gives μh(ψs(A))=μh(A), allowing infinite values. Countable choice required by the measure and change-of-variables suppliers is supplied by the ambient ZFC assumption in [F4].

4.1givenF1F3∎

In any small coordinate ball the positive continuous density has a positive lower bound on a smaller ball; thus every nonempty open set has positive measure. Smoothness and positive definiteness up to compact S, together with compactness of the closed bounded annulus in C‾, give a bounded smooth density in finitely many bounded charts there. Integrating these bounded densities over their bounded coordinate domains bounds the volume of the interior annulus by a finite sum of finite numbers. Every Borel subset of that interior annulus has no larger measure, even when its closure meets S.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.