Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A complete stationary boost band with a global local-isometry certificate

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. Let (M^,g^) be a smooth time-oriented globally hyperbolic vacuum four-manifold with complete Killing field T^. Supply a nonempty compact smooth two-manifold S, a number η>0, and a product neighborhood embedding F0:W→M^, where W=(−η,η)2×S and F0({U=V=0}) is the bifurcation surface. Write g0=F0∗g^. Require a constant κ>0 and a g0-Killing field K=κ(V∂V−U∂U). In the rotating case require a smooth circle action ϕsZ on S of period 2π whose product lift to W is a g0-isometry; its generator Z is tangent to the S factor, preserves U,V, and satisfies [K,Z]=0. Require a constant Ω and F0∗T^=K−ΩZ. In the nonrotating case set Ω=0, omit Z and its action, and require F0∗T^=K.

For sufficiently small 0<δ<η, the abstract manifold B={(U,V,p)∈R2×S:∣UV∣<δ2} carries a smooth vacuum metric, the complete stationary isometric action At(U,V,p)=(e−κtU,eκtV,ϕ−ΩtZp), and a smooth local isometry F:B→M^ agreeing with F0 on W∩B and intertwining At with the complete T^ flow. The map F is not asserted injective. The lifted circle action is isometric, and the pure boost K is also complete and Killing on the band. The band has a smooth temporal function pulled back from a smooth Cauchy temporal function on M^; the pullback is not asserted Cauchy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the Statement.

Goal: Construct the complete band, its local-isometry certificate and its temporal function.

[F1]

The complete smooth field T^ has a smooth global flow Φt, with inverse Φ−t, the flow composition law and uniqueness of integral curves. The fundamental theorem on flows

[F2]

Under their own hypotheses, the canonical-realization and local-collar suppliers describe the intended ambient spacetime and positive-κ commuting boost/circle germs. These are contextual descriptions of the intended application. The abstract construction assumes the ambient data and full product geometry explicitly as stated; neither supplier is invoked here to derive those hypotheses from global hyperbolicity. Vacuum development realizing the exterior and local boost germs External local boost collar and canonical temporal splice

[F3]

Global hyperbolicity, the time orientation and the temporal-function convention are those of the causal-data interface; the induced spacelike geometry has the hypersurface-data convention. Pullback tensors are evaluated by applying the differential to each vector argument. Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data The pullback of a covariant tensor field

[F4]

On a nonempty time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold, Countable Choice supplies a positive smooth density with total measure one, positive measure on every nonempty open set, and zero measure on chart-Lebesgue-null Borel sets. On a globally hyperbolic such manifold, Countable Choice and Dependent Choice then give the continuous volume time function. With that volume time, the smooth Cauchy temporal splitting theorem supplies a smooth Cauchy temporal function with past timelike gradient. Existence of a positive smooth volume density of total mass one on a smooth Lorentzian four-manifold The Geroch volume function: a continuous strictly increasing time function whose levels are Cauchy sets Smooth Cauchy temporal splitting: a global temporal function with Cauchy levels and an orthogonal complete flow

[F5]

The Lie derivative is the derivative at zero of tensor pullback by the local flow. A smooth tensor is invariant on every common local flow domain exactly when its Lie derivative vanishes; the flow derivative is ddtΦt∗H=Φt∗(LXH) for a smooth tensor H and the flow of X. Applied to a complete Killing field this gives metric invariance for every real flow parameter. The Lie derivative of a tensor field A tensor field is flow-invariant exactly when its Lie derivative vanishes

[F6]

Under Countable Choice, a smooth nondegenerate metric on a smooth four-manifold has its unique Levi–Civita connection, whose Christoffel symbols in a chart are Γabc=12gad(∂bgdc+∂cgbd−∂dgbc). For a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold the curvature formula is Rabcd=∂cΓadb−∂dΓacb+∑e(ΓaceΓedb−ΓadeΓecb), and Ric⁡bd=∑aRabad. The last identity is the defining metric contraction ∑a,cgacRabcd after lowering the first index of R. Here vacuum means precisely Ric⁡=0, with no physical field-law premise. Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields Tensoriality of the curvature, its coordinate formula and its point-normal metric formula The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Fix 0<δ<η. The product circle action and the boost define At for every t∈R, preserve UV, and commute. Every q∈B has a parameter t with A−tq∈W. If UV≠0, the equation eκt∣U∣=e−κt∣V∣ has a real solution because κ>0, and both balanced absolute coordinates equal ∣UV∣<δ<η. If exactly one coordinate is nonzero, choose the sign and size of t to shrink it below η; if both vanish, every parameter works. Define F(q)=Φt(F0(A−tq)) using any such parameter. This construction uses only the explicitly assumed local geometry, with the circle factor omitted in the nonrotating case.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1

The working parameters for each q form an interval: each absolute normal coordinate is monotone in t, and the circle action keeps the S factor inside S. For any two working parameters the entire intervening segment therefore stays in W. On that segment, F0 carries the generator K−ΩZ to T^, so uniqueness of integral curves gives equality of the two definitions of F(q). This also applies at U=V=0, where the full circle orbit stays in W. A fixed working parameter remains working near q by openness; on this neighborhood F=Φt∘F0∘A−t is smooth and a local diffeomorphism. The parameter t=0 gives F=F0 on W∩B. If t works for q, then t+s works for Asq; the flow law yields F(Asq)=Φs(F(q)) for every real s.

3.1step 2.1F3algebra

Set gB=F∗g^. The pullback evaluation formula and the invertibility of dF give a smooth nondegenerate Lorentzian metric of the same signature as g^, agreeing with g0 on W∩B. Pull back the ambient time orientation through dF: the inverse image of any ambient smooth future timelike orientation field is smooth and timelike, and selects the future cone on the band. Thus F is a time-orientation-preserving local isometry.

4.1givenstep 3.1A1F3F6algebra

To verify the vacuum assertion locally, fix q∈B and restrict F to a diffeomorphism from a neighborhood O of q onto a chart neighborhood (Q,x) in M^. Use y=x∘F as the coordinates on O. In these coordinates the coefficient functions of gB and g^, viewed on the same open subset of R4, are identical by the pullback formula. Their inverse matrices and all derivatives are therefore identical. Countable Choice from [A1] permits the Levi–Civita formula in [F6] for these smooth nondegenerate four-dimensional metrics. That formula gives identical Christoffel coefficient functions, and the curvature formula and Ricci contraction of [F6] give identical Ricci coefficient functions. The ambient ones vanish by hypothesis, hence Ric⁡(gB)=0 on O. Since q was arbitrary, the band is vacuum everywhere. This proves the needed local naturality directly in matching charts.

5.1givenstep 2.1step 3.1step 4.1F1F3F5algebra

By [F5], LT^g^=0 implies Φt∗g^=g^ for every real t. Equivariance from step 2.1 and the pullback formula then give At∗gB=gB. In the rotating case write Rs(U,V,p)=(U,V,ϕsZp). Take the same working parameter in neighborhoods of q and Rsq, which is possible because Rs changes neither normal coordinate. The expression F=Φt∘F0∘A−t and commutation of Rs with A−t reduce Rs∗gB=gB to the assumed Rs∗g0=g0. The stationary field is complete because At is defined for all real t. The commuting isometric action AtRΩt is the pure boost flow, proving that K too is complete and Killing by differentiation at zero in [F5]. In the nonrotating case the circle terms are omitted and At itself is the complete pure boost flow.

6.1step 5.1A1F3F4algebra∎

Apply the finite-density supplier to M^ (nonempty because it contains the product neighborhood), then the volume-time theorem and the smooth Cauchy temporal splitting theorem. Their hypotheses hold: M^ is a time-oriented smooth globally hyperbolic Lorentzian four-manifold, and both choice assumptions are [A1]. This produces a smooth Cauchy temporal function τ^. For τ=τ^∘F, the local-isometry identity gives gB−1(dτ,dτ)=g^−1(dτ^,dτ^)∘F<0. The pulled-back time orientation gives dτ(v)>0 for every nonzero future causal v. Thus τ is temporal on the whole band. Neither injectivity of F nor a Cauchy property of its pulled-back levels is used.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.