How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cauchy sections do not end at a one-sided chronological horizon
Statement
Let be an open region of a time-oriented spacetime, put , and , and suppose is a Cauchy hypersurface of . Then cannot meet or . Consequently . Closures and boundaries here are taken in the ambient spacetime.
Facts & Assumptions
Work in ZF with the Axiom of Choice. Chronology, ambient boundaries, the time orientation and the relative Cauchy condition use Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data and The Axiom of Choice.
Chronological futures and pasts are open. If is a past set and , then ; the dual statement holds for future sets. Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets clauses (a) and (c).
A future-inextendible future causal curve on extends to a future causal curve inextendible in both directions; the dual assertion holds in the past direction. This applies in any open Lorentzian submanifold, with inextendibility recomputed there. physics:lem-gr-causal-curve-conventions clause (d).
A timelike relation followed or preceded by a causal relation remains timelike. Push-up rule clauses (a) and (b).
A Cauchy set is acausal in its own spacetime. Convergent causal ends are extendible, maximal geodesics have no limit, and Cauchy sets are acausal clause (d).
Through a point with future timelike initial vector there is a smooth geodesic on an open interval about . Its tangent remains nonzero future timelike. The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection clause (a), and Covariant differentiation along curves: metric pairing, parallel transport and geodesic speed clause 3 and its time-orientation argument.
Smooth future timelike curves belong to the locally absolutely continuous timelike class. Increasing diffeomorphisms of intervals with positive derivative preserve that class and future-inextendibility. Causal reachability is transitive and includes timelike reachability. Chart independence, concatenation, reparametrization and transitivity for causal curves clauses (c), (e) and (f).
In ZF, AC implies Countable Choice and prescribed-initial-point Dependent Choice. These are the choice hypotheses of the causal-curve, chronology and push-up suppliers used here, and AC supplies their inherited choice assumptions. The implication is not restricted to Banach spaces. AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement, the AC assumption in [F1], and the declared supplier interfaces.
Goal: Prove the stated conclusions.
Under the AC assumption in [F1], [F8] supplies Countable Choice and Dependent Choice for all the causal suppliers below. By [F2], and are open, hence is an open time-oriented Lorentzian submanifold. By [F4] and the inclusion of timelike reachability in causal reachability from [F7], and : for example with and gives . Thus is a past set and a future set. Every causal segment from to stays in : choose with and ; every point of the segment satisfies , so [F4] gives . Finally apply [F5] in to the given Cauchy hypersurface , obtaining acausality relative to . This invokes the Cauchy-set theorem directly, rather than applying one-sided extension to a finite segment.
Suppose . Use [F6] at with initial vector to obtain a future timelike geodesic with . Since is open, choose so that . For , its smooth timelike segment from to is an admissible timelike curve by [F7], so . Since and is a past set, [F2] puts this entire preceding tail in , hence in . Reparametrize it by , ; this is an increasing smooth diffeomorphism onto with positive derivative. By [F7] the resulting curve is future timelike. It has ambient limit as , and since is open. It therefore has no future endpoint in , so is future-inextendible relative to .
Apply [F3] in to , obtaining an inextendible future causal curve that agrees with for . The Cauchy condition gives with . Choose . The segment of gives , while the remaining timelike geodesic segment to gives . Hence [F4] gives . By [F2], is an open neighborhood of ; since , shrink it to a neighborhood of avoiding . From choose . Then and . Step 1.1 puts a joining timelike segment entirely in , contradicting acausality of there. Reversing the time orientation interchanges and and gives the same contradiction for .
Since , its closure lies in . At any point of that closure outside , at least one of the two open-set memberships fails and hence the corresponding boundary occurs. If the point lies in exactly one of , step 3.1 excludes it. If it lies in neither, it belongs to . Thus , as claimed.
Depends on
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- The Axiom of Choice
- Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets
- Equivalence of the absolutely-continuous and continuous causal conventions, and one-sided inextendible extensions
- The push-up rule: p << q and q <= r imply p << r, together with the timelike-piece criterion
- Convergent causal ends are extendible, maximal geodesics have no limit, and Cauchy sets are acausal
- The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection
- Covariant differentiation along curves: metric pairing, parallel transport and geodesic speed
- Chart independence, concatenation, reparametrization and transitivity for causal curves
- AC supplies the countable and dependent choices used in Banach integration
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.