How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform asymptotic slope bound
PDF p. 14: §3.2.1, lapse display and (3.5)
Statement
Fix and consider a family indexed by satisfying the hypotheses of the positive transformed-lapse and transformed-end results for each , with the common normalized end estimates of the latter. In particular, each supplied connected smooth spacelike maximal section has compact boundary , one exterior end, and a normalized height with uniformly in angle as for each fixed . The sections and their future normals are oriented as in the lapse supplier. Existence of these sections is assumed.
Assume that their interiors are stationary maximal graphs over the same original section in the fixed stationary product , as in the stationary maximal-graph definition. Thus the graph functions are all defined on , including its fixed Cartesian end , where is independent of . This is a hypothesis on the candidate family, not a consequence of the metric estimates or the lapse bound.
Use , , , and write . Let be the inverse metric components in these coordinates and set . Then the stationary lapse is and . There are constants independent of such that every normalized graph is defined on and there. Consequently the graph tangent metrics are uniformly positive definite and the future unit normals have uniformly bounded components in the normalized asymptotic coordinate frame outside that common radius.
Statement references
Transformed lapse equation and bounds
Asymptotically flat positive-q ends and cylindrical limit
Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising
The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
Facts & Assumptions
The graph convention defines the fixed stationary product, graph functions on the original section, and normalized height by . Spacelikeness means positive definiteness of the induced graph metric. Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
Under the stated candidate-section hypotheses, and . Transformed lapse equation and bounds
Uniformly for , the normalized metric has , , and on a common end. The constants in these bounds may depend on . Asymptotically flat positive-q ends and cylindrical limit
The inverse metric is the bilinear form on covectors whose component matrix is the inverse of . Raising a covector gives , with . The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising
For a smooth spacelike embedded hypersurface in a time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, the orthogonal complement of each tangent space is a negative-definite line, and the future unit normal is unique and smooth. Its induced metric is the restriction of the ambient metric to tangent vectors. Only these normal and induced-metric assertions are used, not a sign convention for the second fundamental form. The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
Proof
Given: The family and candidate sections, including the fixed original graph domain, in the Statement.
Goal: Establish a common normalized graph domain, the lapse identity, slope estimate, and uniform end geometry.
By the fixed-domain hypothesis and [F1], the normalized height is defined for . Since , every graph is therefore defined on . Intersect this common exterior with the common metric end in [F3] by increasing its radius. No parameter-uniform rate for the individual slope limits is used to obtain this domain.
Put . The graph tangent vectors are , and the nonzero covector annihilates each . By [F4], its raised vector is a nonzero normal, so [F5] gives . The two unit normals are . Since , . The supplied future normal has by [F2], so it is the negative choice, with metric dual . Consequently . The upper lapse bound and imply .
Inverting the uniformly Minkowskian matrices in [F3] gives , , and uniformly on a common sufficiently distant end. In particular, the spatial inverse block satisfies . Writing , step 1.2 therefore gives . Absorbing the last term by yields after increasing the common radius and constant. By step 1.1 this estimate holds on the entire normalized exterior for every graph.
Evaluating the ambient metric on the tangent vectors gives . The bounds in [F3] and step 2.1 make uniformly, so its eigenvalues lie, for example, between and beyond a common larger radius. Also by [F4] and step 1.2; the numerator is uniformly bounded by [F3] and step 2.1, and by step 1.2. Hence the normal components are uniformly bounded there.
Source notes
The article citation attributes the stated estimate and the original fixed-section graph class. The proof uses the declared lapse and end estimates, mathematical inverse-metric and hypersurface-normal suppliers, the explicitly assumed common graph class, and a local calculation. It does not use the article's slope claim as a premise.
Depends on
- Transformed lapse equation and bounds
- Asymptotically flat positive-q ends and cylindrical limit
- Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
- The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising
- The future unit normal, induced metric and second fundamental form of a spacelike hypersurface
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF page 12, Theorem 3.1; page 14, §3.2.1 and equation (3.5)