Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Asymptotic maximal graph equation and coefficients

PDF p. 14: §3.2.1, divergence equation and L

Statement

Fix δ∈(0,1) and take the family of candidate sections and normalized stationary end coordinates in the uniform asymptotic slope result. In particular, the sections are assumed to exist, are smooth and spacelike and have zero mean curvature; the differentiated end and graph-slope estimates there hold uniformly for q∈[δ,1]. Write g=gq, u=u~q, r=rq, and let indices i,j,k range over 1,2,3 in the coordinates (tq,xq). Then, on a common sufficiently distant end, u satisfies ∂i ⁣(−det⁡g (gijuj−gi0)−g00+2g0juj−gjkujuk)=0. Moreover this equation can be written aij(g,∂u)uij+bj(g,∂g,∂u)uj=f(g,∂g), where aij=δij+O(r−1), bj=O(r−2), and f=O(r−3), uniformly for q∈[δ,1]. These estimates mean bounds by constants independent of q on a common end; the constants and radius may depend on δ. The function f in this equation is distinct from the stationary norm −g(T,T).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

In the normalized stationary coordinates, the graph is tq=u(xq) and the spacelike graph has zero mean curvature. With the supplied sign convention, the mean curvature is H=−tr⁡hk. Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions

[F2]

Uniformly on a common end, g00=−1+O5(r−1), g0i=O5(r−2), and gij=δij+O5(r−1); the subscript means that each spatial derivative through order five gains the corresponding inverse power of r. Asymptotically flat positive-q ends and cylindrical limit

[F3]

Uniformly on a common end, ∣∂u∣≤Cr−1/2 and the graph is spacelike. Uniform asymptotic slope bound

[F4]

On a smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold with its Levi–Civita connection, the metric density w=∣det⁡g∣ gives ∇μJμ=w−1∂μ(wJμ) for a smooth vector field J in a smooth chart. The derivative of the metric density and the chart formula for the divergence of a vector field

[F5]

If h is continuously differentiable on an open interval containing [0,1], then ∫01h′(s) ds=h(1)−h(0). The fundamental theorem of calculus and integration by parts

[F6]

If v:U→V⊆Rn is totally differentiable at a∈U and w:V→Rm is totally differentiable at v(a), then D(w∘v)(a)=Dw(v(a))∘Dv(a). The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)

[F7]

Let a<b and c<d. If v,h:[a,b]×[c,d]→R are continuous and ∂yv(y,s)=h(y,s) for a<y<b and every s∈[c,d], then G(y)=∫cdv(y,s) ds satisfies G′(y)=∫cdh(y,s) ds for a<y<b. Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral

[F8]

The inherited stationary graph data supply an original stationary Lorentzian metric gorig, normalized Ernst potential, pole with Tp=0, and smooth stationary Harrison one-form with Wq(T)=dq−Dq on a domain Dq>0 containing the exterior; the transformed metric is gq=(Dq/4)Aq∗gorig. For these data the Harrison Lorentzian-algebra result gives dq>0 and LTgq=0. The graph coordinates have T=∂t and tq=dqt/(4q), with q and dq constant in spacetime. Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights Invertibility, Lorentz signature and stationary norm

Proof

Given: The candidate family and normalized end coordinates in the Statement.

Goal: Derive the divergence equation and the stated uniform coefficient bounds.

1.1givenF1F3F4F8algebra

By [F8], the Harrison stationarity result applies to the supplied data on the end and gives LTgq=0. The local flow of T=∂t translates t with the spatial coordinates fixed, so the flow definition of the metric Lie derivative makes every component of gq independent of t. Since ∂tq=(4q/dq)T, the components in the normalized coordinates are independent of tq as well. Set τ=tq−u(xq) and D=−g00+2g0juj−gjkujuk. The spacelike graph has timelike normal covector dτ, so D>0. Its future unit normal has components nμ=−gμν∂ντ/D. Extend this normal off the graph using the same formula and the time-independent function u. The mean curvature vanishes exactly when ∇μnμ=0: differentiating g(n,n)=−1 shows the normal-normal contribution to the ambient divergence vanishes. Applying [F4] to the smooth extended normal gives ∇μnμ=(−det⁡g)−1∂μ(−det⁡g nμ). Time independence removes the time derivative, and ni=(gijuj−gi0)/D. This proves the displayed divergence equation.

2.1F2F3F6step 1.1algebra

Write p=(pj) and define D(x,p)=−g00+2g0jpj−gjkpjpk and Ai(x,p)=−det⁡g(gijpj−gi0)/D(x,p). The metric estimates and matrix inversion give g00=−1+O5(r−1), g0i=O5(r−2), gij=δij+O5(r−1), and −det⁡g=1+O5(r−1). For p=s∂u, 0≤s≤1, the slope bound implies D(x,p)=1+O(r−1) uniformly; hence it is bounded away from zero on a common larger end. Direct differentiation of the displayed rational expression, holding p fixed for spatial derivatives, gives ∂pjAi(x,p)=δij+O(r−1) and ∂xi∂pjAi(x,p)=O(r−2) uniformly on this segment. Also Ai(x,0)=O(r−2) and ∂xiAi(x,0)=O(r−3). These estimates use only the first spatial derivatives of the metric bounds and the explicit factors p, with ∣p∣2=O(r−1).

3.1F5F6step 2.1algebra

Define Bij(x,p)=∫01∂pjAi(x,sp) ds. By step 2.1, for each fixed x and p=∂u(x), the curve s↦Ai(x,sp) is smooth on an open interval containing [0,1]. The chain rule [F6] gives its derivative as ∂pjAi(x,sp)pj. Applying [F5] componentwise gives Ai(x,p)=Ai(x,0)+Bij(x,p)pj. The same identity holds for nearby (x,p) wherever the segment has D(x,sp)>0.

4.1F7step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Fix x0 on the common end and p0=∂u(x0). For each spatial index i, hold the other coordinates and p=p0 fixed. Positivity of D(x0,sp0) for 0≤s≤1 and smoothness give a sufficiently small closed interval [a,b] containing x0i in its interior on which D(x,sp0)>0 for every s∈[0,1]. On this rectangle the integrand ∂pjAi(x,sp0) and its xi derivative are continuous, so [F7] applies with integration interval [0,1]. Consequently, with p held fixed, ∂xiBij(x0,p0)=∫01∂xi∂pjAi(x0,sp0) ds. The uniform pointwise bound in step 2.1 makes this O(r−2) after summing over i; the auxiliary interval need not be uniform in q.

5.1F6step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Apply the chain rule [F6] to x↦Ai(x,∂u(x)). The divergence equation becomes ∂pjAi(x,∂u)uij+∂xiAi(x,∂u)=0, with the second derivative holding p fixed. Differentiating the identity in step 3.1 at fixed p and using step 4.1 yields aijuij+bjuj=f, with aij=∂pjAi(x,∂u), bj=∂xiBij(x,∂u) with p held fixed in that derivative, and f=−∂xiAi(x,0). Steps 2.1 and 4.1 give aij=δij+O(r−1), bj=O(r−2) and f=O(r−3), uniformly in q. This specifies one admissible choice of the coefficients; the divergence equation itself is independent of that choice.

Source notes

The article citation attributes the original equation and estimates. The proof uses the declared end and slope results and the displayed coordinate calculation, without using the article's claim as a premise.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources