How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Closedness and smooth limiting maximal sections
PDF p. 20: §3.2.3, compact estimates; PDF p. 21: §3.2.3, passage to the limit
Statement
Adopt the regular mass-one stationary vacuum construction with original maximal exterior section , bifurcation sphere , , and the selected smooth Harrison family . Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix and a family of existing connected smooth spacelike maximal sections satisfying all candidate, positive-lapse, boundary, compact-height and normalized-end hypotheses of Uniform compact graph and positive-lapse estimates, Lemma 3.4: uniform graph regularity at the bifurcation sphere and Rescaled annular estimates through four derivatives. Their interiors are stationary graphs over .
If , a subsequence converges to a stationary graph in on every compact subset of , for every . Its interior is smooth, spacelike and maximal for . It extends smoothly as a spacelike hypersurface with boundary . In the normalized end coordinates and , its normalized height obeys for sufficiently far out. In particular the normalized height tends to zero at infinity.
Facts & Assumptions
The model, regularity and normalization specify the smooth stationary exterior product, the reference section and boundary, and the positive scaling . A stationary graph is the image of ; spacelike means positive-definite induced metric and maximal means zero mean curvature. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
Work in ZFC, including the choice assumptions of the compactness supplier. Hölder spaces and their norms are those in the indicated definition. The Axiom of Choice Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains
The Harrison metrics are jointly smooth in spacetime and parameter. On every compact subset of the reference interior the compact estimate gives uniformly bounded candidate normals in fixed compact exterior coordinates, uniform full stationary bounds for for every finite and (in particular the fourth-order bounds), uniform finite-order local spacelike temporal-graph estimates, and a positive lower bound for the stationary lapse . Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity Uniform compact graph and positive-lapse estimates
On a common collar of , the candidates are one-to-one normal-geodesic graphs over the reference section with zero boundary heights, a uniform strict spacelike cone and uniform bounds up to for every finite . The normal-graph definition specifies the exponential-map representation and mean curvature. The same horizon supplier gives unique smooth Hawking-flow heights on a common closed reference collar, with . Lemma 3.4: uniform graph regularity at the bifurcation sphere Normal graphs and the nonlinear mean-curvature map
On a common normalized end the candidate heights obey the stated derivative decay through order four, with constants uniform on . The candidates satisfy the maximal graph equation. Rescaled annular estimates through four derivatives Asymptotic maximal graph equation and coefficients
For real continuous functions on a compact metric space, an equicontinuous pointwise bounded family has compact closure. Arzelà--Ascoli for real C(K) under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded
For maps between Euclidean open sets, total differentiability of at and of at gives . The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
The horizon-supplier hypotheses expressly required in the Statement bind the reference section to , where is the actual original exterior section, and assume . The same required horizon hypotheses include two-sided far-end access: for some and every , with in the selected physical stationary end chart, , using timelike paths within the original exterior and metric. Retain the fixed common end-estimate radii and constants of this supplied family. Use this same reference section, selected Harrison family and complete candidate hypotheses in [F2]; the spherical identification and the physical stationary end chart remain independent. The common-collar result supplies a fixed field vanishing on , Killing for every , with the same positive normal-plane boost rate , and a complete smooth flow whose images of reference interior points remain in the exterior . Its uniformly spacelike reference collar has jointly smooth boundary-distance coordinates and future normals . The Gaussian-flow lemma supplies jointly smooth normal coordinate maps and inverses on common smaller neighborhoods. Here ; their identification with the unit sphere is an auxiliary collar coordinate choice, unrelated to the physical end chart. Lemma 3.3: common spacelike reference collar Bounded boost times give a uniform Gaussian collar cone Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
The smooth background and signed boost data in [F6], with the bound in [F2], meet the bounded-time hypotheses of the Gaussian-flow lemma. Use the common closed source collar and target radius in the boundary-angle result's explicit image-and-capture conclusion, with . The Gaussian-flow lemma gives and , with and uniform in . The boundary-angle conclusion identifies the entire bounded-height flow-image portion over with its unique normal graph and supplies a common ambient neighborhood of with contained in that graph. Its complete original-background and candidate height/barrier hypotheses are already required in the Statement and [F2], [F6]. Reduce to lie in the higher-regularity graph domain of [F2], and shrink accordingly as permitted by that explicit conclusion. These applications require no uniform derivatives of . Bounded boost times give a uniform Gaussian collar cone Boundary angle bound and normal-graph cone
Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence. Apply this successively to finitely many real coordinates when needed. Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence
Continuous real functions on closed finite intervals are Riemann integrable. For two integrable functions the absolute difference of their integrals is bounded by the interval length times a uniform bound for their difference. The fundamental theorem applies to each smooth candidate derivative along a coordinate segment in its open chart. We use these facts to identify the componentwise compactness limits as successive derivatives; on boundary half-boxes first work in the interior and pass to the boundary by continuity. A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion Uniformly close integrable functions have integrals differing by at most the interval length times their uniform error The fundamental theorem of calculus and integration by parts
Proof
Given: The construction, candidate family and convergent parameter sequence in the Statement.
Goal: Construct the asserted subsequential smooth maximal limit, including its boundary and end behavior.
Choose a countable compact exhaustion of by coordinate patches with compact closure and a finite subcover at each stage. On each patch, [F1] bounds derivatives through order four and makes those derivatives equicontinuous. Apply [F4] componentwise to the finitely many derivatives through order four, and diagonalize over the patches and exhaustion. To identify these componentwise limits, write for the uniform limit of on a smaller coordinate box. For every coordinate segment remaining in that box, [F9] gives . The integrability and uniform integral-error bound in [F9] permit passage to . After division by nonzero , continuity of makes the right-hand average tend to as , identifying the corresponding partial derivative. Induction over derivative order therefore identifies all the extracted limits with derivatives of . The resulting subsequence therefore converges in on every compact subset. The uniform fourth-derivative bounds imply convergence in there for every : the difference of third derivatives tends uniformly to zero and has a common Lipschitz bound, so its -Hölder seminorm also tends to zero. Denote the limit by .
For the graph level function , the future normal is . Since and , the lapse is . Fix a compact subset of the reference interior. By [F1] its candidate points and normals are uniformly bounded in fixed compact exterior coordinates. The smooth stationary field and the jointly smooth metrics have bounded coordinate components on that compact region and the compact parameter interval. Consequently the contraction has a uniform upper bound there. Thus . Joint metric convergence and step 1.1 pass this inequality to , making the limiting level covector timelike and the graph spacelike. Its mean curvature is a continuous expression in the metric and its first derivatives and the graph derivatives through order two, so it is zero by passage to the limit.
Use the compact supplier's explicit full stationary estimates in [F1] at every finite . The same complete compact, height/barrier, horizon, normalized-end and positive-lapse hypotheses are required in the Statement, with the actual reference section and selected family matched in [F6]. The quantitative coordinate transfer is supplied by that result, rather than inferred here from pointwise transversality alone. Apply [F4] to successive finite collections of these stationary derivative fields and diagonalize over the exhaustion and derivative orders, retaining a subsequence of step 1.1. Use the coordinate-segment argument in step 1.1 with [F9] to identify every new derivative limit as a derivative of that same . Hence is smooth in the interior.
On the common normal collar, express the heights in the fixed coordinate domain using the jointly smooth maps in [F6]. The uniform finite-order bounds in [F2] remain uniform under these smooth background coordinate changes. Apply [F4] in finitely many closed collar charts and diagonalize over derivative orders and smaller closed target collars, retaining the interior subsequence from step 3.1. Identify the componentwise derivative limits by the coordinate-segment argument in step 1.1 using [F9], first in boundary half-box interiors and then on their closed faces by continuity. Write the resulting heights as smoothly up to on every smaller closed collar, and set and . Then smoothly there. The zero boundary values give , and the uniform tangent spacelikeness in [F2] makes a smooth spacelike embedded normal graph with boundary . It remains to compare its punctured image with the stationary limit.
Fix and . By [F7], with and . In the fixed identification , apply [F8] successively to the five bounded real coordinates . Along a further subsequence for this fixed point they converge to ; the closed interval inequalities and sphere equation pass to the limit, so and . Smoothness of the reference collars and complete flow in [F6] gives . Thus these candidate points converge to an exterior point, and their stationary projections lie eventually in one compact interior coordinate neighborhood. Write their stationary coordinates as . Since , uniform convergence on that compact neighborhood in step 1.1 and continuity of imply . Consequently every punctured normal-limit point belongs to the stationary limit. The positive lower bound for and bounded flow times supply precisely the control that prevents its stationary projections from escaping to the horizon.
Conversely, choose a smaller common ambient neighborhood of inside the capture neighborhood in [F7] and the Gaussian domains in [F6], with all its target radial coordinates less than some . Let be any stationary-limit point there. Its candidate approximants converge to by step 1.1 and are eventually in the capture neighborhood, so with . Joint smoothness of the Gaussian inverses gives , where , , and . The cone inequality in [F7] passes to . If , this forces and hence , contradicting . Therefore . Smooth convergence of the normal heights on smaller closed collars in step 4.1 gives , so . This proves the reverse inclusion near . Together with step 5.1 it identifies the two images on an ambient overlap, and the embedded spacelike normal graph from step 4.1 extends the stationary limit smoothly with boundary exactly .
In the end coordinates the rescalings depend smoothly on and remain invertible for . Write . The normalized height definition gives . For fixed , the map is linear with derivative . Applying [F5] successively to and its partial derivatives gives for every multi-index with ; order zero is the defining identity. These applications are valid because each candidate is smooth, and the linear rescaling has no higher derivatives. At any fixed point on a sufficiently distant common normalized end, inside a compact neighborhood of the original end. Step 1.1 gives uniform convergence of the derivatives through order four on that neighborhood. The displayed identity and continuity of the limit derivatives and scalar factors therefore give convergence of normalized derivatives through order four at . Passing to the uniform inequalities in [F3] yields for . The case gives the required zero limit at infinity. Together with steps 2.1–6.1 this proves the Statement.
Source notes
The article reference attributes the original continuation claim. The argument above uses the declared estimates and compactness input; it does not assume the article's limiting conclusion as a premise. The boundary comparison in steps 5.1 and 6.1 is a locally authored repair of the generated draft, using the same supplier hypotheses already required in the Statement. It establishes no defect attributable to the original article. The original extraction and its coverage, including original Theorem 1.1 and its unresolved source-assessment status, are unchanged.
Depends on
- Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization
- Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
- Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
- Stationary maximal graphs and normalized graph heights
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Normal graphs and the nonlinear mean-curvature map
- Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains
- The Axiom of Choice
- Arzelà--Ascoli for real C(K) under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice: compact closure iff equicontinuous and pointwise bounded
- The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
- Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
- Uniform compact graph and positive-lapse estimates
- Lemma 3.4: uniform graph regularity at the bifurcation sphere
- Rescaled annular estimates through four derivatives
- Asymptotic maximal graph equation and coefficients
- Lemma 3.3: common spacelike reference collar
- Boundary angle bound and normal-graph cone
- Bounded boost times give a uniform Gaussian collar cone
- Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- The fundamental theorem of calculus and integration by parts
- A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- Uniformly close integrable functions have integrals differing by at most the interval length times their uniform error
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF pp. 12 and 20–21, Theorem 3.1 and §3.2.3