Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniformly close integrable functions have integrals differing by at most the interval length times their uniform error

Statement

Let u,v∈R, and let f and g be integrable between u and v. If η≥0 and

∣f(x)−g(x)∣≤η

throughout the closed interval with endpoints u and v, then

∣∫uvf−∫uvg∣≤η ∣v−u∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals u,v, functions f,g integrable between them, and a real η≥0 with ∣f−g∣≤η on the interval between them.

[L2]

If a<b, an integrable function h satisfying m≤h(x)≤M on [a,b] has m(b−a)≤∫abh≤M(b−a) (If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)).

[L3]

For every real z, −∣z∣≤z≤∣z∣ and ∣−z∣=∣z∣; for c>0, ∣z∣<c exactly when −c<z<c (Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If u=v, both oriented integrals are 0 and the asserted inequality holds.

L1algebra
1.2

Suppose u<v and put h:=f−g. Then h is integrable and ∫uvh=∫uvf−∫uvg.

L1
2.1

The hypothesis gives ∣h(x)∣≤η, while [L3] gives −∣h(x)∣≤h(x)≤∣h(x)∣; hence −η≤h(x)≤η on [u,v], and [L2] gives −η(v−u)≤∫uvh≤η(v−u).

step 1.2L2L3
3.1

Hence ∣∫uvf−∫uvg∣=∣∫uvh∣≤η(v−u) when u<v.

step 1.2step 2.1L3
4.1

If u>v, apply step 3.1 to the ordered pair (v,u) and use antisymmetry of oriented integrals; the same bound results because ∣u−v∣=∣v−u∣.

step 3.1L1L3
5.1

The alternatives u=v, u<v, and u>v are exhaustive, and steps 1.1, 3.1, and 4.1 give the claimed inequality.

step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources