Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Horizon expansion variation and Einstein–Maxwell curvature

PDF p. 26: (4.4) and following sentence

Statement

Adopt the regular stationary vacuum model with original exterior section maximal, mass normalized to one, and stationary field T nontrivial on the bifurcation sphere S. Fix q∈(0,1]. Use one smooth Harrison construction on the exterior and an open neighborhood O of S common to the electrovacuum and horizon-preservation results, with the same normalized Ernst potential, pole and stationary primitive, in the invariant horizon gauge required by the latter. Denote its metric and electromagnetic two-form by gq,Fq.

Suppose a smooth spacelike maximal section Σq with boundary S and the boundary data of the horizon notation are supplied: smooth metric and two-form extensions on an open neighborhood US of S, a smooth spacelike section extension across S, an outward unit normal, and an admissible normal-graph tube. Require that on an open neighborhood OS⊆US∩O of S the supplied metric and two-form extensions coincide with these same Harrison fields, with matching orientations and time orientations. Use the section extension and normal-graph tube near S inside OS.

Let nq be the future unit normal to the extended section and νq the outward unit normal to S in it. Set Lq=nq+νq and L‾q=(nq−νq)/2, so that gq(Lq,L‾q)=−1. With ∇(q) the Levi–Civita connection of gq, define the normal connection one-form by ζq(X)=−gq(L‾q,∇X(q)Lq) for X tangent to S. The oriented area form of γq=gq∣TS is dμq; define eq,bq by (⋆gqFq)∣TS=eq dμq and Fq∣TS=bq dμq.

Let ̸∇(q), ̸div⁡(q) and ̸Δ(q) be the intrinsic connection, divergence and divergence-of-gradient Laplacian of γq; divergence of a one-form means divergence of its metric-dual vector. Let Kq be its Gauss curvature with the positive-round-sphere convention. The outgoing expansion is the γq-trace of (X,Y)↦gq(∇X(q)Lq,Y). Pulling back the outgoing expansion of the normal graph with its future null normal nq+νq,u defines Θq(u); write Lqϕ=ddϵ∣0Θq(ϵϕ).

Then S has zero outgoing expansion and, for every smooth function ϕ on S, Lqϕ=−̸Δ(q)ϕ+2ζq⋅̸∇(q)ϕ+(Kq+̸div⁡(q)ζq−∣ζq∣2−eq2−bq2)ϕ. Moreover Ric⁡gq(Lq,L‾q)=eq2+bq2. The dot product and norm are taken with γq. The conclusions are conditional on the supplied section and graph data.

The original-section maximality premise is imposed on the actual physical exterior section C=Σ0∩E for the original metric g, so Hg∣C=0. Where this result uses the original reference section Σ1, it denotes the closure B=C∪S of this actual section. Maximality of a separately labelled chart-side region or another supplied section is not substituted for this premise. The spherical identification and the physical stationary end chart remain independent. Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The model and regular data, the original maximality, mass-one normalization, nontriviality of T∣S, and the supplied candidate section and graph data are as in the Statement; work with the Axiom of Choice. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

The boundary metric and two-form coincide on OS with the same Harrison fields used in both the electrovacuum and horizon-preservation applications, in the invariant horizon gauge. The section extension and graph tube are used in OS, with matching orientations and time orientations. Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity

[F1]

The surface and horizon notation suppliers define the null gauge, flux densities, intrinsic operators, expansion and its normal-graph variation under the stated smoothness and orientation hypotheses. Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation Surface measure, flux densities and null normal gauge

[F2]

The Harrison fields satisfy the geometric source-free electrovacuum equations on an open neighborhood of S. In particular Ric⁡ab=2(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd), with contractions made using gq. Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity Geometric electrovacuum equations and charge convention

[F3]

For gq, the local Hawking field K is Killing, vanishes on S, and has a nonzero-rate normal boost on the quotient TM∣S/TS. The surface S is spacelike and totally geodesic for gq, so both its null second fundamental forms vanish. Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity Normal boost action and invariant two-forms at a fixed surface

[F4]

In the normalized surface gauge, the electrovac normal-contraction lemma gives Ric⁡(L,L‾)=e2+b2 and zero scalar curvature. Electrovac contraction in the normalized normal plane

[F5]

The general MOTS variation supplier gives the displayed specialized operator when the surface gauge is used and both χL=0 and Ric⁡(L,L)=0 hold. Its variation is the admissible normal-graph variation in the stated gauge. General MOTS first variation before electrovac specialization

[F6]

A smooth nondegenerate metric has a unique torsion-free metric-compatible connection; its curvature and Ricci tensor use the stated tensor conventions. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions

Proof

Given: The model, parameter and supplied section, orientation and normal-graph data in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the mixed-null Ricci identity and the stated outgoing-expansion variation.

1.1givenA2F1F2F3

By [A2], the metric and two-form on the supplied boundary neighborhood and graph tube are the same fields, with the same orientations, as in the electrovacuum and horizon-preservation constructions. Thus [F2] and [F3] apply to the actual fields used in the variation. By the horizon result, S is gq-spacelike and its null second fundamental forms vanish. In particular χLq=0, and its trace, the outgoing expansion, is zero. The stated graph data therefore define an admissible variation of a marginally outer trapped surface in the gauge of the first-variation supplier.

2.1givenF3F6step 1.1

The flow of K fixes S pointwise and acts as an isometry of gq. It consequently preserves the gq-normal plane of S. Its action on that plane is conjugate, through the quotient by TS, to the nonzero-rate boost in [F3]. As the flow is connected to the identity, it preserves each of the two null lines in the normal plane; its action on the line of Lq is multiplication by eκt or e−κt, with κ>0. An isometry preserves the Levi–Civita connection by uniqueness and hence preserves its Ricci tensor. At a fixed point this gives Ric⁡(Lq,Lq)=e±2κtRic⁡(Lq,Lq). Choosing a sufficiently small nonzero flow time yields Ric⁡(Lq,Lq)=0.

3.1F1F2F4F5step 1.1step 2.1∎

The electrovac equations and the normalized surface gauge satisfy the hypotheses of the normal-contraction lemma, which gives Ric⁡gq(Lq,L‾q)=eq2+bq2. Combining the vanishing of χLq and Ric⁡(Lq,Lq) with the specialized first-variation formula gives the displayed expression for Lqϕ. The first-variation supplier includes the conversion between its g(l,k)=−2 normalization and Lq,L‾q; no different null gauge is substituted.

Source notes

The article reference attributes equation (4.4) and the subsequent mixed-null Ricci identity. The deduction above uses the completed suppliers and does not use the article's assertion as a premise. The boundary compatibility is an explicit condition on the supplied data. The notation definition alone permits more general extensions and does not establish their electrovacuum equations or Killing symmetry. The proof here applies both geometric results only to the common Harrison fields specified in the Statement; no existence of compatible section or graph data is asserted.

These premises specify the generated conditional scope and are not attributed to the original article. The substantive local horizon conclusions are retained. The immutable original extraction is unchanged; in particular, original Theorem 1.1 retains its unresolved source-assessment status.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources