How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Horizon expansion variation and Einstein–Maxwell curvature
PDF p. 26: (4.4) and following sentence
Statement
Adopt the regular stationary vacuum model with original exterior section maximal, mass normalized to one, and stationary field nontrivial on the bifurcation sphere . Fix . Use one smooth Harrison construction on the exterior and an open neighborhood of common to the electrovacuum and horizon-preservation results, with the same normalized Ernst potential, pole and stationary primitive, in the invariant horizon gauge required by the latter. Denote its metric and electromagnetic two-form by .
Suppose a smooth spacelike maximal section with boundary and the boundary data of the horizon notation are supplied: smooth metric and two-form extensions on an open neighborhood of , a smooth spacelike section extension across , an outward unit normal, and an admissible normal-graph tube. Require that on an open neighborhood of the supplied metric and two-form extensions coincide with these same Harrison fields, with matching orientations and time orientations. Use the section extension and normal-graph tube near inside .
Let be the future unit normal to the extended section and the outward unit normal to in it. Set and , so that . With the Levi–Civita connection of , define the normal connection one-form by for tangent to . The oriented area form of is ; define by and .
Let , and be the intrinsic connection, divergence and divergence-of-gradient Laplacian of ; divergence of a one-form means divergence of its metric-dual vector. Let be its Gauss curvature with the positive-round-sphere convention. The outgoing expansion is the -trace of . Pulling back the outgoing expansion of the normal graph with its future null normal defines ; write .
Then has zero outgoing expansion and, for every smooth function on , Moreover . The dot product and norm are taken with . The conclusions are conditional on the supplied section and graph data.
The original-section maximality premise is imposed on the actual physical exterior section for the original metric , so . Where this result uses the original reference section , it denotes the closure of this actual section. Maximality of a separately labelled chart-side region or another supplied section is not substituted for this premise. The spherical identification and the physical stationary end chart remain independent. Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
Statement references
Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization
Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation
Surface measure, flux densities and null normal gauge
Geometric electrovacuum equations and charge convention
Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity
Normal boost action and invariant two-forms at a fixed surface
Electrovac contraction in the normalized normal plane
General MOTS first variation before electrovac specialization
Facts & Assumptions
The model and regular data, the original maximality, mass-one normalization, nontriviality of , and the supplied candidate section and graph data are as in the Statement; work with the Axiom of Choice. Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator The Axiom of Choice
The boundary metric and two-form coincide on with the same Harrison fields used in both the electrovacuum and horizon-preservation applications, in the invariant horizon gauge. The section extension and graph tube are used in , with matching orientations and time orientations. Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity
The surface and horizon notation suppliers define the null gauge, flux densities, intrinsic operators, expansion and its normal-graph variation under the stated smoothness and orientation hypotheses. Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation Surface measure, flux densities and null normal gauge
The Harrison fields satisfy the geometric source-free electrovacuum equations on an open neighborhood of . In particular , with contractions made using . Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity Geometric electrovacuum equations and charge convention
For , the local Hawking field is Killing, vanishes on , and has a nonzero-rate normal boost on the quotient . The surface is spacelike and totally geodesic for , so both its null second fundamental forms vanish. Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity Normal boost action and invariant two-forms at a fixed surface
In the normalized surface gauge, the electrovac normal-contraction lemma gives and zero scalar curvature. Electrovac contraction in the normalized normal plane
The general MOTS variation supplier gives the displayed specialized operator when the surface gauge is used and both and hold. Its variation is the admissible normal-graph variation in the stated gauge. General MOTS first variation before electrovac specialization
A smooth nondegenerate metric has a unique torsion-free metric-compatible connection; its curvature and Ricci tensor use the stated tensor conventions. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
Proof
Given: The model, parameter and supplied section, orientation and normal-graph data in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the mixed-null Ricci identity and the stated outgoing-expansion variation.
By [A2], the metric and two-form on the supplied boundary neighborhood and graph tube are the same fields, with the same orientations, as in the electrovacuum and horizon-preservation constructions. Thus [F2] and [F3] apply to the actual fields used in the variation. By the horizon result, is -spacelike and its null second fundamental forms vanish. In particular , and its trace, the outgoing expansion, is zero. The stated graph data therefore define an admissible variation of a marginally outer trapped surface in the gauge of the first-variation supplier.
The flow of fixes pointwise and acts as an isometry of . It consequently preserves the -normal plane of . Its action on that plane is conjugate, through the quotient by , to the nonzero-rate boost in [F3]. As the flow is connected to the identity, it preserves each of the two null lines in the normal plane; its action on the line of is multiplication by or , with . An isometry preserves the Levi–Civita connection by uniqueness and hence preserves its Ricci tensor. At a fixed point this gives . Choosing a sufficiently small nonzero flow time yields .
The electrovac equations and the normalized surface gauge satisfy the hypotheses of the normal-contraction lemma, which gives . Combining the vanishing of and with the specialized first-variation formula gives the displayed expression for . The first-variation supplier includes the conversion between its normalization and ; no different null gauge is substituted.
Source notes
The article reference attributes equation (4.4) and the subsequent mixed-null Ricci identity. The deduction above uses the completed suppliers and does not use the article's assertion as a premise. The boundary compatibility is an explicit condition on the supplied data. The notation definition alone permits more general extensions and does not establish their electrovacuum equations or Killing symmetry. The proof here applies both geometric results only to the common Harrison fields specified in the Statement; no existence of compatible section or graph data is asserted.
These premises specify the generated conditional scope and are not attributed to the original article. The substantive local horizon conclusions are retained. The immutable original extraction is unchanged; in particular, original Theorem 1.1 retains its unresolved source-assessment status.
Depends on
- Stationary vacuum model and asymptotic normalization
- Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime
- Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data
- Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Horizon null frame, flux densities and stability operator notation
- Surface measure, flux densities and null normal gauge
- Geometric electrovacuum equations and charge convention
- Proposition 2.1: Einstein–Maxwell equations and regularity
- Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity
- Normal boost action and invariant two-forms at a fixed surface
- Electrovac contraction in the normalized normal plane
- General MOTS first variation before electrovac specialization
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF page 26, equation (4.4) and the following sentence