How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth invariant Harrison primitive near the horizon and at infinity
Statement
In the mass-one stationary vacuum construction under the precise Radu GR/SBS and original maximal-slice hypotheses in [F1], define , , , where is the smooth twist potential on the exterior and a neighborhood of the bifurcation sphere satisfying and as , and put and . The symbol denotes the oriented Lorentzian Hodge star and . There exists a smooth stationary real one-form on the exterior and a neighborhood of the bifurcation sphere , with , locally invariant under the Hawking field and rotational field , and satisfying at a common zero of . Here , and has period . In the fixed stationary end chart, and . One primitive has both this end gauge and the smooth invariant homotopy gauge near . The local Hawking-field invariance is asserted only where the local field is defined.
Facts & Assumptions
Import the exact construction and hypotheses of the sole statement-bearing Radu citation below. In particular, §3.1 (3.2) specifies and as ; its following paragraph supplies the global smooth potential on and its smooth extension across the bifurcation sphere. This includes the stationary product , , the zero-period criterion for exact two-forms, vanishing first cohomology of the end and collar, and the original stationary collar. These are external inputs, not consequences of the definition of a bifurcate Killing horizon.
Differential forms, stationary fields, bifurcate horizons, self-dual/Hodge conventions, differentiated decay and periodic actions use the declared geometric definitions. Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization Complex self-dual forms and metric-dependent contraction Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging
Stokes' theorem transfers periods across the compact annulus between homologous spheres. Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains
The five local intermediate constructions below give the normal homotopy, equivariance and forced normalization, radial finite-order estimate, stationary lifting and exact gauge gluing under their explicit hypotheses. Relative homotopy primitive on a normal bundle Equivariant homotopy and forced contraction constant Radial primitive and five differentiated decay bounds Stationary lifting of a spatial primitive Stationary exact corrections preserve two prescribed gauges
External input
The smooth Radu construction in [F1] is imported as an established external input with the complete source statement and hypotheses above. Its spatial decay makes the period on tend to zero: the coefficients are and the area scales as . Closedness and [F3] therefore give zero period on and on a generator sphere. The source's cohomology criteria provide the base primitive on and a global spatial primitive. The first two intermediate lemmas then explain the smooth invariant normal-bundle construction and the forced constant at ; the fourth lifts the spatial primitive with exactly this constant. The third proves the radial formula and its five derivative bounds. The fifth explains why exact corrections on the end and the original stationary collar preserve the normalization and leave the Hawking symmetry intact near . No global extension of or is required.
Source notes
The five intermediate lemmas were fully authored before admitting the residual source inputs. This item retains literature-derived proof provenance and is not a claim that all of Radu's geometric or asymptotic analysis has been reconstructed locally. In particular, the radial lemma proves regularity from the recorded bound; smoothness of the chosen radial end form is included in the imported smooth construction, not inferred solely from five derivative bounds. The collar input is the original collar, avoiding dependence on the Harrison electrovacuum construction. Radu's §3.3 derivation of (3.28) uses the original vacuum end and does not require transformed charge formulas. The separate held vacuum Ernst, local rigidity and Harrison electrovacuum items are not logical suppliers here; their applicable inputs are expressly imported from the independently read source. Source reading does not grant Step-7 judgment or establish a defect in the article under study.
Depends on
- Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions
- Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization
- Complex self-dual forms and metric-dependent contraction
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Periodic isometries and invariant normal averaging
- Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains
- Relative homotopy primitive on a normal bundle
- Equivariant homotopy and forced contraction constant
- Radial primitive and five differentiated decay bounds
- Stationary lifting of a spatial primitive
- Stationary exact corrections preserve two prescribed gauges
- Alexandru F. Radu, Rigidity of stationary black holes with small ADM angular momentum · §1.1 GR/SBS and maximality; Lemma 2.1; §3.1 (3.2) and the following global-existence and extension paragraph; §3.2 (3.9), (3.13)–(3.15); Appendix A.1 (A.2)–(A.11), PDF pp. 29–30; Appendix A.3 Lemma A.1 at q=1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Under Radu's GR, SBS and original maximal-slice assumptions with mass one, the real two-form $\Theta_0=4((f-1)F+\psi\star F)$, $F=\tfrac12dT^\flat$, $\sigma=f+i\psi$, $f=-g(T,T)$, with $\psi$ the smooth twist potential satisfying $d\psi=2i_T\star F$ and $\psi\to0$ as $r\to\infty$ on the exterior and extending smoothly across the bifurcation sphere, is closed and $i_T\Theta_0=dD_0$, $D_0=|1-\sigma|^2$. There is a stationary smooth primitive $W_0$ on the exterior and a neighborhood of its bifurcation sphere. Near the sphere it is invariant under the local commuting fields $K=T+\Omega_HZ$ and $Z$; at a common zero $p$ of $T,Z$ it satisfies $W_0(T)+D_0=D_0(p)$. On the end its spatial components are $-\int_1^\infty sx^j(\Theta_0)_{ji}(sx)\,ds=O_5(r^{-3})$. The exact stationary cutoff corrections retain the local homotopy gauge and radial gauge simultaneously. The original q=1 collar is available without first constructing $W_0$.
Hypotheses: Smooth four-dimensional stationary vacuum spacetime in Radu §1.1 GR/SBS: specified asymptotically flat end with (1.1) differentiated through order six; globally hyperbolic exterior; complete nowhere-zero stationary field whose exterior orbits meet the specified spacelike slice transversely; slice diffeomorphic to the outside of a ball, with smooth transverse nonexpanding horizon branches meeting at a sphere, stationary field tangent to them and not identically zero on the sphere; original slice maximal and smooth to its boundary; mass rescaled to one. Local fields normalized as in (3.9), with common pole p. No small ADM angular momentum is needed for this construction.
Reading limits: Fresh reading: arXiv:2610.09729v1 HTML, §1.1 GR/SBS and maximality, Lemma 2.1, §3.2–3.3, Appendix A.1 and the original q=1 specialization of Appendix A.3; PDF pp. 28–30 text and p. 29 rendered formulas inspected. Other cited papers were not freshly read. These are source-statement/application readings, not independent proof review. Adjudication update: freshly consulted the HTML v1 §3.1 definition (3.2) and the immediately following global-existence and tubular-neighborhood extension paragraph, with §1.1 GR/SBS and maximality, Lemma 2.1 and §3.2 for applicability. The earlier reported PDF and other passage readings are retained history, not new reading credit for this repair; no PDF was freshly inspected. No source proof audit is claimed.
Sources
- Alexandru F. Radu, Rigidity of stationary black holes with small ADM angular momentum · §1.1 GR/SBS and maximality; Lemma 2.1; §3.1 (3.2) and the following global-existence and extension paragraph; §3.2 (3.9), (3.13)–(3.15); Appendix A.1 (A.2)–(A.11), PDF pp. 29–30; Appendix A.3 Lemma A.1 at q=1