Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radial primitive and five differentiated decay bounds

Statement

Let B=12Bij dxi∧dxj be a closed C5 two-form on {∣x∣>R}⊂R3, with R>0 and Bij=O5(r−4), r=∣x∣, in the differentiated convention. Define Ai(x)=−∫1∞sxjBji(sx) ds and A=Ai dxi, with repeated spatial indices summed. Then A is C5, dA=B, xiAi=0, and Ai=O5(r−3). If the same differentiated estimates hold at every finite order, the same formula is smooth. The finite-order hypothesis alone is used only for the C5 conclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The differentiated convention Bij=O5(r−4) supplies a radius R1>R and constants Cβ such that ∣∂βBij(y)∣≤Cβ∣y∣−4−∣β∣ for ∣β∣≤5 and ∣y∣≥R1. It imposes no bound as ∣y∣ decreases to R. Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity

[F2]

A Ck coordinate form has Ck alternating coefficient functions; the exterior derivative is defined by differentiating coefficients and wedging the corresponding coordinate covector. Here closed means dB=0, equivalently ∂iBjk+∂jBki+∂kBij=0. These conventions apply on any open Euclidean set, including this three-dimensional exterior. Finite-regularity differential forms, Hamiltonian fields and canonical maps in phase charts

[F3]

Every integral from 1 to ∞ below denotes the limit of its proper integrals from 1 to L as L→∞, when that limit is finite. Improper integrals over unbounded intervals

[F4]

For an open integration domain and one real parameter in an open interval, a continuous integrand with a continuous parameter derivative, an absolutely integrable base slice, and an integrable bound for the derivative uniform on each compact parameter interval has a continuously differentiable integral, with derivative equal to the derivative integral. Differentiation under an improper multiple integral under an integrable derivative bound

[F6]

For a function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable inside, a Riemann-integrable extension of its derivative integrates to its endpoint difference. Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative

[F7]

A locally Riemann-integrable function dominated in absolute value eventually by a function with a convergent improper integral is absolutely improperly integrable. Comparison tests for improper integrals

[F8]

For real functions differentiable at a point, sums and products are differentiable there with the sum and product rules. A composition is differentiable when the inner function is differentiable there and the outer function is differentiable at its value, with derivative given by the chain rule. For integers m≥1, (tm)′=mtm−1. Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients

[F9]

A Euclidean map whose partial derivatives exist on a neighborhood and are continuous at a point is totally differentiable there with its Jacobian as derivative. For composable maps totally differentiable at the relevant points, D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a). If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the stated construction and identities.

1.1givenF1F2F5F8

Put E={x:∣x∣>R} and hi(s,x)=sxjBji(sx). For fixed s≥1, fixing the other two coordinates makes xℓ↦Bji(sx) a composition of the corresponding one-variable coordinate slice of Bji with xℓ↦sxℓ. The slice is C5 and the inner map is affine, so [F8] applies successively through five coordinate derivatives, with one factor s per chain-rule differentiation. The product rule also differentiates the factor xj at most once. Thus, for ∣β∣=k≤5, these rules express ∂xβhi as a sum of terms of the forms sk+1xj(∂βBji)(sx) and, when k≥1, constant multiples of sk(∂β−eℓBℓi)(sx) with βℓ>0. Thus, whenever sr≥R1, each sum is bounded by Ckr−3−ks−3. Let K⊂E be nonempty and compact, let a=min⁡K∣x∣>R, and choose S>1 with Sa≥R1. On K×[1,S] the same derivatives are continuous and hence bounded. Enlarging a constant to absorb this finite interval gives ∣∂xβhi(s,x)∣≤CK,βs−3 for all s≥1 and x∈K. This is a local uniform majorant, not a bound uniform up to the inner boundary.

2.1F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1

Since ∫1Ls−3 ds=(1−L−2)/2, the majorant in step 1.1 is integrable. Comparison gives absolute convergence of every integral of ∂xβhi for ∣β∣≤5. These integrals are jointly continuous in x: on a compact neighborhood K the tails beyond L are bounded uniformly by CK,β/(2L2), while the integral over [1,L] is continuous by uniform continuity of its integrand on K×[1,L] and the estimate of an integral by interval length times the uniform bound. Choose an open rectangular neighborhood with compact closure K⊂E. For each ∣β∣≤4, fix the other two coordinates and apply [F4] to ∂xβhi with each remaining coordinate as the real parameter and integration domain (1,∞). The integrand and its parameter derivative are continuous, every base slice is absolutely integrable, and step 1.1 supplies an integrable derivative bound on every compact parameter interval. The endpoint s=1 is regular and has no effect on the integral. Successively applying this argument gives ∂xβAi(x)=−∫1∞∂xβhi(s,x) ds for every ∣β∣≤5; their joint continuity proves A∈C5(E).

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1

For r≥R1 the asymptotic estimate in step 1.1 holds for every s≥1, so ∣∂xβAi(x)∣≤Ckr−3−k∫1∞s−3 ds=(Ck/2)r−3−k. Hence Ai=O5(r−3) in exactly the convention of [F1]. If the hypotheses hold at every finite order, repeat steps 1.1 and 2.1 at each such order, with constants and radii allowed to depend on the order; this yields smoothness of the same integral without an all-order conclusion from the finite-order hypothesis alone.

4.1F1F2F3F6F8F9step 2.1∎

Closedness and antisymmetry give ∂iBkj−∂jBki=∂kBij. The first derivative formula from step 2.1 therefore yields ∂iAj−∂jAi=−∫1∞[2sBij(sx)+s2xk∂kBij(sx)] ds. For fixed x∈E, the ray γx(s)=sx lies in E on the open interval (R/r,∞) containing [1,L]. Its derivative is the vector x. The C5 coefficients of B have continuous first partial derivatives, so [F9] makes them totally differentiable and gives ddsBij(sx)=xk∂kBij(sx). The product and power rules in [F8] now identify the integrand as the continuous derivative of the C1 function s↦s2Bij(sx). On [1,L], [F6] evaluates its integral as L2Bij(Lx)−Bij(x). The first term tends to zero by [F1], since it is O(L−2r−4) as L→∞ for fixed x. Passing to the improper limit gives ∂iAj−∂jAi=Bij(x), which is dA=B by [F2]. Finally xiAi=−∫1∞sxixjBji(sx) ds=0 by antisymmetry and convergence.

Depends on

Used by · 5

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.