How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Radial primitive and five differentiated decay bounds
Statement
Let be a closed two-form on , with and , , in the differentiated convention. Define and , with repeated spatial indices summed. Then is , , , and . If the same differentiated estimates hold at every finite order, the same formula is smooth. The finite-order hypothesis alone is used only for the conclusion.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The differentiated convention supplies a radius and constants such that for and . It imposes no bound as decreases to . Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
A coordinate form has alternating coefficient functions; the exterior derivative is defined by differentiating coefficients and wedging the corresponding coordinate covector. Here closed means , equivalently . These conventions apply on any open Euclidean set, including this three-dimensional exterior. Finite-regularity differential forms, Hamiltonian fields and canonical maps in phase charts
Every integral from to below denotes the limit of its proper integrals from to as , when that limit is finite. Improper integrals over unbounded intervals
For an open integration domain and one real parameter in an open interval, a continuous integrand with a continuous parameter derivative, an absolutely integrable base slice, and an integrable bound for the derivative uniform on each compact parameter interval has a continuously differentiable integral, with derivative equal to the derivative integral. Differentiation under an improper multiple integral under an integrable derivative bound
Continuous real functions on nonempty compact metric spaces are bounded; continuous maps on compact metric spaces are uniformly continuous. A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous
For a function continuous on a closed interval and differentiable inside, a Riemann-integrable extension of its derivative integrates to its endpoint difference. Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
A locally Riemann-integrable function dominated in absolute value eventually by a function with a convergent improper integral is absolutely improperly integrable. Comparison tests for improper integrals
For real functions differentiable at a point, sums and products are differentiable there with the sum and product rules. A composition is differentiable when the inner function is differentiable there and the outer function is differentiable at its value, with derivative given by the chain rule. For integers , . Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients
A Euclidean map whose partial derivatives exist on a neighborhood and are continuous at a point is totally differentiable there with its Jacobian as derivative. For composable maps totally differentiable at the relevant points, . If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the stated construction and identities.
Put and . For fixed , fixing the other two coordinates makes a composition of the corresponding one-variable coordinate slice of with . The slice is and the inner map is affine, so [F8] applies successively through five coordinate derivatives, with one factor per chain-rule differentiation. The product rule also differentiates the factor at most once. Thus, for , these rules express as a sum of terms of the forms and, when , constant multiples of with . Thus, whenever , each sum is bounded by . Let be nonempty and compact, let , and choose with . On the same derivatives are continuous and hence bounded. Enlarging a constant to absorb this finite interval gives for all and . This is a local uniform majorant, not a bound uniform up to the inner boundary.
Since , the majorant in step 1.1 is integrable. Comparison gives absolute convergence of every integral of for . These integrals are jointly continuous in : on a compact neighborhood the tails beyond are bounded uniformly by , while the integral over is continuous by uniform continuity of its integrand on and the estimate of an integral by interval length times the uniform bound. Choose an open rectangular neighborhood with compact closure . For each , fix the other two coordinates and apply [F4] to with each remaining coordinate as the real parameter and integration domain . The integrand and its parameter derivative are continuous, every base slice is absolutely integrable, and step 1.1 supplies an integrable derivative bound on every compact parameter interval. The endpoint is regular and has no effect on the integral. Successively applying this argument gives for every ; their joint continuity proves .
For the asymptotic estimate in step 1.1 holds for every , so . Hence in exactly the convention of [F1]. If the hypotheses hold at every finite order, repeat steps 1.1 and 2.1 at each such order, with constants and radii allowed to depend on the order; this yields smoothness of the same integral without an all-order conclusion from the finite-order hypothesis alone.
Closedness and antisymmetry give . The first derivative formula from step 2.1 therefore yields . For fixed , the ray lies in on the open interval containing . Its derivative is the vector . The coefficients of have continuous first partial derivatives, so [F9] makes them totally differentiable and gives . The product and power rules in [F8] now identify the integrand as the continuous derivative of the function . On , [F6] evaluates its integral as . The first term tends to zero by [F1], since it is as for fixed . Passing to the improper limit gives , which is by [F2]. Finally by antisymmetry and convergence.
Depends on
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Finite-regularity differential forms, Hamiltonian fields and canonical maps in phase charts
- Improper integrals over unbounded intervals
- Differentiation under an improper multiple integral under an integrable derivative bound
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
- Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
- Comparison tests for improper integrals
- Sum, product, quotient, and chain rules from difference quotients
- If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative
- The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘ Df(a)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.