How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independence is monotone under induced embeddings
Statement
Let and be finite simple graphs. If has an induced embedding into , then . In particular, excludes an induced copy of in .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
An induced embedding is an injection on vertices that preserves adjacency and nonadjacency between distinct vertices; an induced copy arises from such an embedding. See Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph.
An independent set has no adjacent distinct vertices. For a finite simple graph, its independence number is the maximum cardinality of an independent vertex set, and this maximum is attained. See Cliques, independent sets, clique number and independence number.
A bijection from a finite set to another set makes their cardinalities equal. See The cardinality | A| of a finite set.
An injection satisfies ; a surjection takes every value in its codomain; a bijection has both properties. The image consists of the values for . See Injection, surjection, bijection.
Proof
Given: Finite simple graphs and and an induced embedding .
Goal: Show and the stated exclusion of an induced copy.
Choose an independent set with . If two distinct vertices of were adjacent, their distinct preimages in would be adjacent by the defining equivalence for an induced embedding, contrary to independence. Thus is independent in .
The restriction is injective because is injective, and it is surjective by the definition of . Hence it is a bijection, so . By maximality of , . Consequently, if , no induced embedding, and hence no induced copy of in , can exist.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.