Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Incidence Algebras and Möbius Inversion — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Not suppliedaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The full Möbius table of the Boolean lattice 2[3]

Example

Let [3]={1,2,3} and order 2[3] by inclusion (The Boolean lattice of subsets of a finite set and its rank levels). The complete table is determined by

μ(A,B)=(−1)∣B∖A∣(A⊆B)

(For A⊆B in a finite Boolean lattice, μ(A,B)=(−1)∣B∖A∣). Thus the value is 1 on the diagonal, −1 when B adds one element, 1 when it adds two elements, and −1 from ∅ to [3].

Equivalently, the comparable pairs split as follows:

| ∣B∖A∣ | number of pairs | μ(A,B) | |---:|---:|---:| | 0 | 8 | 1 | | 1 | 12 | −1 | | 2 | 6 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | −1 |

For a cover A⊂A∪{i} the recurrence reads 1+(−1)=0. For the top interval it reads 1+3(−1)+3(1)+(−1)=0, in agreement with The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y.

;f1gf2gf3gf1;2gf2;3gf1;3gf1;2;3g¹(;;B)=1¹(;;B)=¡1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Not suppliedaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The Möbius table of a four-element chain

Example

For the chain c0<c1<c2<c3, the complete upper-triangular table is

μ(ci,cj)j=0j=1j=2j=3
i=01−100
i=11−10
i=21−1
i=31

This is On a finite chain, the Möbius function is 1 on the diagonal, −1 on covers and 0 on longer intervals: diagonal entries are 1, cover entries are −1, and entries spanning more than one cover are 0. For example, the recurrence gives μ(c0,c2)=−(1−1)=0, then μ(c0,c3)=−(1−1+0)=0 (The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Not suppliedaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The Möbius function on the divisor poset of 12 and its agreement with μ(1),μ(2),μ(3),μ(4),μ(6),μ(12)

Example

The positive divisors of 12 are 1,2,3,4,6,12. In the divisibility order (The divisibility poset of positive integers), the covers are

1⋖2,1⋖3,2⋖4,2⋖6,3⋖6,4⋖12,6⋖12.

1[1]2[¡1]3[¡1]4[0]6[1]12[0]nodelabel:d[¹j(1;d)]

For every comparable a∣b, The number-theoretic Möbius function is the poset Möbius function of divisibility: μ(n)=μ∣(1,n) gives μ∣(a,b)=μ(b/a). Hence the full table is obtained from

μ(1)=1,μ(2)=−1,μ(3)=−1,μ(4)=0,μ(6)=1,μ(12)=0.

In particular, the row from 1 is (1,−1,−1,0,1,0) in the divisor order listed above. The recurrence checks the less immediate values: 1−1−1+μ(1,6)=0 gives μ(1,6)=1, and 1−1−1+0+1+μ(1,12)=0 gives μ(1,12)=0 (The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Not suppliedaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

The endpoint Möbius value of the four-element diamond is 1

Example

Let the diamond have bottom ⊥, top ⊤, and incomparable middle elements a,b. It is the Boolean lattice on a two-element set, so For A⊆B in a finite Boolean lattice, μ(A,B)=(−1)∣B∖A∣ gives

μ(⊥,⊥)=1,μ(⊥,a)=μ(⊥,b)=−1,μ(⊥,⊤)=1.

The endpoint recurrence displays the same computation directly:

1−1−1+μ(⊥,⊤)=0,

and hence μ(⊥,⊤)=1 (The Möbius recurrence: μP(x,x)=1 and both interval sums of μP vanish when x<y).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: Not suppliedaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

Möbius inversion of ∑d∣nφ(d)=n gives φ(n)=∑d∣nμ(d)(n/d)

Example

The divisor-sum theorem from the CRT development states

n=∑d∣nφ(d)

for every positive integer n (For every positive integer n, ∑d∣n, d>0φ(d)=n). Apply Classical Möbius inversion over positive divisors with g(n)=n and f(n)=φ(n). The form indexed by the complementary divisor gives

φ(n)=∑d∣nμ(d)g(n/d)=∑d∣nμ(d)nd.

At n=12, the values from The number-theoretic Möbius function μ(n) from prime factorisation give

φ(12)=12−6−4+0+2+0=4,

where the terms correspond to d=1,2,3,4,6,12. Thus Möbius inversion recovers φ(12)=4 directly from the CRT divisor-sum theorem.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

A poset with a bottom, a top and countably many incomparable middle elements has an infinite interval, so convolution of constant-one functions is not defined

Statement refuted

Convolution of incidence functions is defined on every poset, even without local finiteness (False: convolution defines an incidence algebra for every poset).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero commutative ring R, the set P:={⊥,⊤}∪(N×{m}), with all three pieces disjoint, and the relation in which ⊥<⊤ and ⊥<(n,m)<⊤ for every n∈N, distinct middle elements are incomparable, and equality is allowed.

[F2]

A poset is locally finite exactly when every interval is finite (Intervals in a poset; locally finite, lower-finite and upper-finite posets).

[F3]

Incidence convolution is the finite ring sum (f∗g)(x,y)=∑z∈[x,y]f(x,z)g(z,y); local finiteness is what makes this sum defined (The incidence functions I(P,R) of a locally finite poset and their convolution).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The relation is reflexive. Opposite inequalities force equality, so it is antisymmetric, and its only nontrivial two-step strict chains have the form ⊥<(n,m)<⊤, whose endpoints are already comparable; thus it is transitive. Hence P is a poset.

given
1.2

Every point of P lies between ⊥ and ⊤, so [⊥,⊤]=P. It contains the countably infinite subset N×{m}, hence is infinite and P is not locally finite.

givenF1F2
2.1

For constant-one functions f and g, the formal endpoint value is (f∗g)(⊥,⊤)=∑z∈P1R. This has one term for every natural-indexed middle point, in addition to the endpoints, and is not the finite ring sum required by convolution.

step 1.2F3
3.1

Thus the proposed convolution is not defined at (⊥,⊤), refuting the statement.

step 1.2step 2.1∎

Remarks


\draw[gray!65] (bot)--(m0) (bot)--(m1) (bot)--(m2) (bot)--(mn) (m0)--(top) (m1)--(top) (m2)--(top) (mn)--(top); \draw[gray!55,densely dotted] (bot)--(dots)--(top);

\node[anchor=west] at (5.15,2.05) {countably many incomparable}; \node[anchor=west] at (5.15,1.55) {middle elements}; \node[anchor=west] at (5.15,.75) {$[\bot,\top]=P$ is infinite}; \end{tikzpicture} ```
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

On a two-element chain, an incidence function with a zero diagonal value is not convolution-invertible

Statement refuted

Every incidence function on a finite poset is convolution-invertible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A two-element chain 0<1, a nonzero commutative ring R, and the incidence function f with f(0,0)=0R, f(0,1)=0R, and f(1,1)=1R.

[L1]

An incidence function is convolution-invertible exactly when every diagonal value is a unit (An incidence function is convolution-invertible if and only if every diagonal value is a unit).

[F1]

The convolution identity has δ(0,0)=1R (The delta and zeta incidence functions).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

If g were a convolution inverse, evaluation at (0,0) would give (f∗g)(0,0)=f(0,0)g(0,0)=0R.

given
2.1

But an inverse equation requires (f∗g)(0,0)=δ(0,0)=1R, and 0R≠1R because the ring is nonzero.

step 1.1F1
3.1

Therefore f is not invertible, in agreement with [L1] because its diagonal value 0R is not a unit.

step 2.1L1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31Open item page →

A four-element chain and a four-element diamond have equal-size endpoint intervals but Möbius values 0 and 1

Statement refuted

The endpoint Möbius value of a finite interval is determined by the number of elements in that interval (False: μP(x,y) depends only on the cardinality of [x,y]).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The four-element chain c0<c1<c2<c3 and the four-element diamond with endpoints ⊥<⊤.

[F1]

The chain computation gives μ(c0,c3)=0 (The Möbius table of a four-element chain).

[F2]

The diamond computation gives μ(⊥,⊤)=1 (The endpoint Möbius value of the four-element diamond is 1).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Both endpoint intervals have four elements.

given
1.2

Their endpoint Möbius values are nevertheless 0 and 1 by [F1] and [F2].

F1F2
2.1

Hence equal-size intervals can have different Möbius values, and the statement is false.

step 1.1step 1.2∎

Remarks


\node[elt] (c0) at (-2.7,0) {$c_0$}; \node[elt] (c1) at (-2.7,1.05) {$c_1$}; \node[elt] (c2) at (-2.7,2.1) {$c_2$}; \node[elt] (c3) at (-2.7,3.15) {$c_3$}; \draw[gray!70] (c0)--(c1)--(c2)--(c3);

\node[elt] (bot) at (2.7,0) {$\bot$}; \node[elt] (a) at (1.65,1.55) {$a$}; \node[elt] (b) at (3.75,1.55) {$b$}; \node[elt] (top) at (2.7,3.15) {$\top$}; \draw[gray!70] (bot)--(a)--(top) (bot)--(b)--(top);

\node[font=\small] at (-2.7,-.75) {$\mu(c_0,c_3)=0$}; \node[font=\small] at (2.7,-.75) {$\mu(\bot,\top)=1$}; \end{tikzpicture} ```

Sources