How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Artinian Rings and Length Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
The companion page keeps the abstract structure visible in concrete rings and modules. Truncated polynomial quotients show how nilpotent maximal ideals control length, exhibits the local-factor product decomposition, and the final examples separate Noetherian, Artinian, and zero-dimensional behavior.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The truncated polynomial ring is local Artinian of length
Example
Let be a field and let
with . Then is a local Artinian ring with maximal ideal , its ideals are exactly for , and its length as an -module is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an integer , and the quotient ring .
Verification
By For every field , is a principal ideal domain, every ideal of is principal. The ideals of correspond by Correspondence theorem: ideals of correspond to ideals of containing to the ideals of containing , hence to the principal ideals with dividing . Up to multiplication by a unit, these are exactly for . Therefore the ideals of are precisely , so is the unique maximal ideal.
The chain in step 1.1 shows directly that is Artinian and that . For each , the quotient is generated by the class of and annihilated by , so it is one-dimensional over the residue field . Hence each quotient has length .
Applying Module length is additive in short exact sequences successively to for shows that . Thus is a local Artinian ring of length .
splits as the product of its two local Artinian factors
Example
The ring decomposes as
The two factors are local Artinian rings, and the two prime ideals of are the pullbacks of the two coordinate prime ideals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ring .
Verification
The ideals and of are comaximal, so Chinese remainder theorem for pairwise comaximal ideals gives . The first factor is a field, hence local, and the second has unique proper nonzero ideal , so it is also local.
Let be a prime ideal of . Since , primality forces or . In the first case every lies in , so for an ideal of ; primality then forces . In the second case . Under the inverse of the isomorphism in step 1.1, these two primes pull back to and in .
So is exhibited concretely as the product of its two local Artinian factors and , and its two prime ideals are exactly the two coordinate pullbacks found in step 2.1.
A field has module length one over itself
Example
Let be a field. Then the regular -module has length .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field .
Verification
The only ideals of a field are and the whole field, so is a composition series of the regular module .
By Composition series and length of a module, that composition series has exactly one factor, so .
and are Noetherian but not Artinian
Example
Let be a field. Then and are Noetherian rings, but neither is Artinian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field .
Verification
Every ideal of is an additive subgroup, so Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number makes it principal; then A commutative ring is Noetherian exactly when every ideal is finitely generated, exactly when its ideals satisfy the ascending chain condition, and exactly when every nonempty set of ideals has a maximal member shows that is Noetherian. Also If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every applied to the field shows that is Noetherian.
In the principal ideals form a strict descending chain, because for every . Likewise is a strict descending chain of ideals in . Therefore neither ring is Artinian.
These two standard examples show that Noetherianity alone does not imply Artinianness.
The module over has length
Example
Let with , and let . Then the -module has length .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , integers and , and the ring .
Verification
By The truncated polynomial ring is local Artinian of length , every quotient with is one-dimensional over . In particular each such quotient has length , and the module also has length .
For every , the natural projection has kernel , so there is a short exact sequence Starting from the base case from step 1.1 and applying Module length is additive in short exact sequences inductively, one gets for every .
Taking in step 2.1 gives .
The ring is zero-dimensional but not Noetherian
Example
Let
Then every prime ideal of is maximal, so has Krull dimension , but is not Noetherian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ring .
Verification
Every element is idempotent, because coordinatewise in . Let be a prime ideal of . Then is an integral domain if and only if is a prime ideal makes an integral domain, and every class still satisfies . So forces or . Thus has exactly two elements and is a field, so is maximal.
For each , let be the sequence with in coordinate and elsewhere, and let . Then is a strict ascending chain of ideals, because for every . Therefore is not Noetherian.
Let The first-coordinate projection is a surjective ring homomorphism with kernel , so is a field and therefore an integral domain. Thus is an integral domain if and only if is a prime ideal makes a prime ideal. By step 1.1 every prime ideal of is maximal, so no strict chain of prime ideals can have length greater than . Since provides a prime ideal, chains of length do occur. Therefore Krull dimension of a nonzero ring gives . Together with step 2.1, this ring is zero-dimensional but not Noetherian, so it is a concrete witness that the Noetherian hypothesis in the prime-maximal Artinian criterion cannot be dropped.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Proposition 16.8
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Exercise (19.8)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Exercise (1.14)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Theorem 16.7
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Section 19
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Sections 3 and 16
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Example (19.7)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Exercise (19.10)
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.52: Length
- The Stacks Project, Section 15.106: Weakly étale ring maps
- The Stacks Project, Section 10.53: Artinian rings