How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Group Cohomology as a Derived Functor — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Derived Functors
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Cohomology as a Derived Functor
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Sequences and Limits
- Set Theory Beyond Choice: Recorded, Not Proved Here
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
2 · Summary
Concrete calculations for the conventions and comparison theorems on the companion page.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Group cohomology of the trivial group
Example
For every abelian group , and for .
Verification
Given: The trivial group and normalized cochains.
Degree zero cochains are , while every positive normalized bar is zero because its only group entry is .
The normalized complex is in degree zero and zero above it, proving the computation.
Degree-zero invariants and coinvariants
Example
Let act on by . Then and .
Verification
Given: The sign action of on .
Fixed points satisfy , hence in .
Coinvariants quotient by , hence are ; degree-zero recovery identifies these with the two asserted groups.
The first bar differentials
Example
The first faces are and .
Verification
Given: Alternating face deletion.
Substitution in the definition yields the two displayed formulas and .
Applying to the three terms of the second formula produces each vertex twice with opposite signs, explicitly illustrating .
Normalizing an inhomogeneous cochain
Example
If is a -cocycle, then , so it is already normalized.
Verification
Given: A -cocycle , so .
Set to get .
Subtracting gives . Thus the normalized representative is itself.
A periodic resolution for a finite cyclic group
Example
For , the augmented complex with alternating maps and is a free periodic resolution of .
Verification
Given: The group ring .
, so this is a complex.
Writing an element as shows , , and . Hence it is exact and every term is free.
Cohomology of a finite cyclic group
Example
For and a left -module , put . Then , and for ,
Verification
Given: The periodic free resolution.
Applying identifies every cochain group with ; the coboundaries alternate between and .
Taking kernel modulo preceding image gives exactly the displayed groups, including the degree-zero kernel.
Shapiro lemma for the trivial subgroup
Example
For an abelian group and , and for .
Verification
Given: The two Shapiro isomorphisms with .
Induction and coinduction from are respectively and .
Shapiro identifies their positive (co)homology with positive (co)homology of the trivial group, which vanishes.
The underlying bar contraction is not equivariant
Statement refuted
The identity-insertion contraction of homogeneous bars is -equivariant for every group .
Counterexample
Given: A group with and the bar generator .
The contraction has , so .
But , which differs from . Thus equivariance fails.
Cohomological dimensions of and
Example
and .
Verification
Given: .
The trivial module for is free, so its projective dimension is zero. For , is a free resolution.
With trivial coefficients , applying Hom sends to zero, so . Hence the resolution length one is minimal.