Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Group Cohomology as a Derived Functor — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Concrete calculations for the conventions and comparison theorems on the companion page.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Group cohomology of the trivial group

Example

For every abelian group M, H0(1;M)=M and Hn(1;M)=0 for n>0.

Verification

Given: The trivial group and normalized cochains.

1.1given

Degree zero cochains are M, while every positive normalized bar is zero because its only group entry is 1.

2.1step 1.1∎

The normalized complex is M in degree zero and zero above it, proving the computation.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Degree-zero invariants and coinvariants

Example

Let C2=⟨t⟩ act on M=Z by tm=−m. Then H0(C2;M)=0 and H0(C2;M)=Z/2.

Verification

Given: The sign action of C2 on Z.

1.1given

Fixed points satisfy m=−m, hence m=0 in Z.

2.1step 1.1∎

Coinvariants quotient by tm−m=−2m, hence are Z/2; degree-zero recovery identifies these with the two asserted groups.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The first bar differentials

Example

The first faces are d(g0,g1)=(g1)−(g0) and d(g0,g1,g2)=(g1,g2)−(g0,g2)+(g0,g1).

Verification

Given: Alternating face deletion.

1.1given

Substitution in the definition yields the two displayed formulas and d(g0)=0.

2.1step 1.1∎

Applying d to the three terms of the second formula produces each vertex twice with opposite signs, explicitly illustrating d2=0.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Normalizing an inhomogeneous cochain

Example

If z:G→M is a 1-cocycle, then z(1)=0, so it is already normalized.

Verification

Given: A 1-cocycle z, so z(gh)=z(g)+gz(h).

1.1given

Set g=h=1 to get z(1)=z(1)+z(1).

2.1step 1.1∎

Subtracting z(1) gives z(1)=0. Thus the normalized representative is z itself.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A periodic resolution for a finite cyclic group

Example

For Cm=⟨t⟩, the augmented complex with alternating maps t−1 and N=1+t+⋯+tm−1 is a free periodic resolution of Z.

Verification

Given: The group ring Z[Cm].

1.1given

(t−1)N=N(t−1)=tm−1=0, so this is a complex.

2.1step 1.1∎

Writing an element as ∑aiti shows ker⁡ε=(t−1)Z[Cm], ker⁡(t−1)=NZ[Cm], and ker⁡N=(t−1)Z[Cm]. Hence it is exact and every term is free.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Cohomology of a finite cyclic group

Example

For Cm=⟨t⟩ and a left Cm-module M, put N=1+t+⋯+tm−1. Then H0(Cm;M)=ker⁡(t−1), and for q≥0, H2q+1(Cm;M)=ker⁡N/(t−1)M,H2q+2(Cm;M)=ker⁡(t−1)/NM.

Verification

Given: The periodic free resolution.

1.1given

Applying Hom⁡Z[Cm](−,M) identifies every cochain group with M; the coboundaries alternate between t−1 and N.

2.1step 1.1∎

Taking kernel modulo preceding image gives exactly the displayed groups, including the degree-zero kernel.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Shapiro lemma for the trivial subgroup

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the supplied resolution conventions for group (co)homology. For an abelian group M and H=1, Hn(G;Coind⁡1GM)=0 and Hn(G;Ind⁡1GM)=0 for n>0.

Verification

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the supplied resolution conventions, and the two Shapiro isomorphisms with H=1.

1.1given

Induction and coinduction from 1 are respectively Z[G]⊗M and Hom⁡Z(Z[G],M).

2.1step 1.1∎

The assumed Choice supplies the transversal premise used in the two cited Shapiro theorems. Shapiro identifies their positive (co)homology with positive (co)homology of the trivial group, which vanishes.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The underlying bar contraction is not equivariant

Statement refuted

The identity-insertion contraction of homogeneous bars is G-equivariant for every group G.

Counterexample

Given: A group G with h≠1 and the bar generator (1).

1.1given

The contraction has s(1)=(1,1), so hs(1)=(h,h).

2.1step 1.1∎

But s(h⋅(1))=s(h)=(1,h), which differs from (h,h). Thus equivariance fails.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Cohomological dimensions of 1 and Z

Example

cd⁡Z(1)=0 and cd⁡Z(Z)=1.

Verification

Given: Z[Z]=Z[t,t−1].

1.1given

The trivial module for 1 is free, so its projective dimension is zero. For Z, 0→Z[t,t−1]→t−1Z[t,t−1]→Z→0 is a free resolution.

2.1step 1.1∎

With trivial coefficients Z, applying Hom sends t−1 to zero, so H1(Z;Z)=Z≠0. Hence the resolution length one is minimal.

Sources