How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Group Cohomology as a Derived Functor — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Derived Functors
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Cohomology as a Derived Functor
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
2 · Summary
Concrete calculations for the conventions and comparison theorems on the companion page.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Group cohomology of the trivial group
Example
For every abelian group , and for .
Verification
Given: The trivial group and normalized cochains.
Degree zero cochains are , while every positive normalized bar is zero because its only group entry is .
The normalized complex is in degree zero and zero above it, proving the computation.
Degree-zero invariants and coinvariants
Example
Let act on by . Then and .
Verification
Given: The sign action of on .
Fixed points satisfy , hence in .
Coinvariants quotient by , hence are ; degree-zero recovery identifies these with the two asserted groups.
The first bar differentials
Example
The first faces are and .
Verification
Given: Alternating face deletion.
Substitution in the definition yields the two displayed formulas and .
Applying to the three terms of the second formula produces each vertex twice with opposite signs, explicitly illustrating .
Normalizing an inhomogeneous cochain
Example
If is a -cocycle, then , so it is already normalized.
Verification
Given: A -cocycle , so .
Set to get .
Subtracting gives . Thus the normalized representative is itself.
A periodic resolution for a finite cyclic group
Example
For , the augmented complex with alternating maps and is a free periodic resolution of .
Verification
Given: The group ring .
, so this is a complex.
Writing an element as shows , , and . Hence it is exact and every term is free.
Cohomology of a finite cyclic group
Example
For and a left -module , put . Then , and for ,
Verification
Given: The periodic free resolution.
Applying identifies every cochain group with ; the coboundaries alternate between and .
Taking kernel modulo preceding image gives exactly the displayed groups, including the degree-zero kernel.
Shapiro lemma for the trivial subgroup
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the supplied resolution conventions for group (co)homology. For an abelian group and , and for .
Verification
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the supplied resolution conventions, and the two Shapiro isomorphisms with .
Induction and coinduction from are respectively and .
The assumed Choice supplies the transversal premise used in the two cited Shapiro theorems. Shapiro identifies their positive (co)homology with positive (co)homology of the trivial group, which vanishes.
The underlying bar contraction is not equivariant
Statement refuted
The identity-insertion contraction of homogeneous bars is -equivariant for every group .
Counterexample
Given: A group with and the bar generator .
The contraction has , so .
But , which differs from . Thus equivariance fails.
Cohomological dimensions of and
Example
and .
Verification
Given: .
The trivial module for is free, so its projective dimension is zero. For , is a free resolution.
With trivial coefficients , applying Hom sends to zero, so . Hence the resolution length one is minimal.