Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

8 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 4 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Long Exact Sequences in Homology - Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples keep the page concrete: two-term and stalk complexes let the connecting maps, cone sequences, naturality squares, and relative-homology windows be computed directly on the nose.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The connecting map for a short exact sequence of two-term complexes

Example

Fix a nonzero integer m. Consider the chain map ×m:Z[0]Z[0] and its canonical short exact cone sequence 0Z[0]Cone(×m)Z[1]0. The middle term is a two-term complex, and its connecting morphism 1:H1(Z[1])H0(Z[0]) is multiplication by m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero integer m.

[L1]

In module categories, the connecting map is computed by lifting a cycle and taking the boundary of the lift (Elementwise formula for the connecting map in module categories).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

A class in H1(Z[1]) is represented by an integer xZ=C0. In the cone sequence, (0,x) is a lift of that cycle to degree 1 of Cone(×m).

L1givenconstruct
2.1

The cone differential sends (0,x) to (mx,0). Therefore [L1] gives 1([x])=[mx]H0(Z[0])=Z. So the connecting morphism is multiplication by m.

L1step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A degreewise split sequence with nonzero connecting map

Example

Take the identity map 1Z[0]:Z[0]Z[0]. Its canonical cone sequence 0Z[0]Cone(1Z[0])Z[1]0 is degreewise split short exact, but its connecting morphism H1(Z[1])H0(Z[0]) is nonzero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The identity map on the stalk complex Z[0].

[L1]

Every canonical cone sequence is degreewise split short exact (The canonical mapping-cone sequence is degreewise split short exact).

[L2]

For the identity map, the connecting morphism agrees with the shifted identity up to sign (The cone connecting map agrees with the shifted identity up to the declared sign).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The displayed cone sequence is degreewise split by [L1].

L1given
2.1

The source H1(Z[1]) and target H0(Z[0]) are both isomorphic to Z, and [L2] identifies the connecting map with ±1 on that group. Hence it is nonzero.

L2step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The cone long exact sequence for multiplication by m

Example

Fix a nonzero integer m and consider the chain map ×m:Z[0]Z[0]. Its cone long exact sequence contains the exact segment 0H1(Cone(×m))Z×mZH0(Cone(×m))0. Hence H1(Cone(×m))=0,H0(Cone(×m))Z/m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero integer m.

[L1]

The cone of a chain map fits into a long exact homology sequence whose outer maps are the homology maps of the original chain map (The cone long exact sequence).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Since both source and target are stalk complexes in degree 0, their only nonzero homology group is H0Z. Applying [L1] to ×m gives the displayed exact segment.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

The map in the middle is multiplication by m, so its kernel is 0 and its cokernel is Z/m. Exactness identifies these with H1(Cone(×m)) and H0(Cone(×m)) respectively.

L1step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Two-out-of-three for a diagram of finite complexes

Example

Compare the cone sequences of ×2 and ×(2) on Z[0]: 0Z[0]Cone(×2)Z[1]0, 0Z[0]Cone(×(2))Z[1]0. Take the vertical maps to be 1Z[0] on the left, 1Z[1] on the right, and the middle map that is multiplication by 1 in degree 1 and by 1 in degree 0. The outer maps are obvious quasi-isomorphisms, so the middle one is too.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The morphism of short exact sequences described in the example.

[L1]

In a morphism of short exact sequences, any two quasi-isomorphisms force the third (Two-out-of-three for quasi-isomorphisms in a short exact sequence diagram).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The left and right vertical maps are isomorphisms of stalk complexes, hence quasi-isomorphisms. With the left map also equal to 1, the middle vertical map commutes with the canonical inclusion jn(y)=(y,0) and the projection to C[1], so it is a morphism of short exact sequences; it is a chain map because it changes the sign in degree 0 exactly as needed to compare the differentials 2 and 2.

L1givenconstruct
2.1

Both cone complexes have homology Z/2 in degree 0 and 0 elsewhere, so the middle vertical map induces an isomorphism on homology. This agrees with the prediction of [L1]: once the outer two maps are quasi-isomorphisms, the third must be as well.

L1step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A six-term cohomology sequence

Example

Fix a nonzero integer m. Let A be the cochain complex with A1=Z and all other terms zero, let C have C0=Z and all other terms zero, and let B have B0=B1=Z with dB0=×m. Then 0ABC0 is the short exact sequence whose component A1B1 and component B0C0 are the identity and whose other components are zero. Its associated long exact cohomology sequence collapses to 0H0(A)H0(B)H0(C)0H1(A)H1(B)H1(C)0, where 0 is multiplication by m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero integer m and the componentwise maps specified in the Example.

[L1]

Short exact sequences of cochain complexes have long exact cohomology sequences (The long exact sequence in cohomology).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The three complexes have cohomology only in degrees 0 and 1, and the only nontrivial differential is dB0=×m. By [L1], there is a long exact cohomology sequence. The groups immediately before H0(A) and after H1(C) are zero, so this long exact sequence collapses to the six displayed terms.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

Here H0(C)=Z and H1(A)=Z. The connecting map sends 1C0 to the class of mA1, so 0 is multiplication by m. This exhibits the boundary as a degree-raising map.

L1step 1.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Homology is not an exact functor

Statement refuted

Homology sends every short exact sequence of complexes to a short exact sequence in each degree.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The degreewise split cone sequence of the identity map on Z[0].

[L1]

That sequence has a nonzero connecting morphism on homology (A degreewise split sequence with nonzero connecting map).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The given sequence is short exact term by term, but [L1] shows that its associated homology sequence contains a nonzero connecting map.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

A degreewise short exact sequence of homology groups would have zero connecting map. Since the displayed sequence does not, it is a counterexample to exactness of homology.

L1step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Naturality of a connecting map under a map of coefficient sequences

Example

Compare the cone sequences of ×2 and ×4 on Z[0]. There is a morphism of short exact sequences 0Z[0]Cone(×2)Z[1]0×2θ10Z[0]Cone(×4)Z[1]0, where θ is the identity in degree 1 and multiplication by 2 in degree 0. The connecting square commutes because the top connecting map is ×2 and the bottom one is ×4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The morphism of cone sequences displayed in the example.

[L1]

The homology connecting morphism is natural under morphisms of short exact sequences (Naturality of the homology connecting morphism).

[L2]

In module categories, the connecting morphism is computed by the lift-boundary formula (Elementwise formula for the connecting map in module categories).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The map θ is a chain map because the top differential is multiplication by 2 and the bottom one is multiplication by 4, so 41=22 on degree 1. Thus the displayed diagram is a morphism of short exact sequences.

L1givenconstruct
2.1

By [L2], the top connecting morphism is multiplication by 2 and the bottom one is multiplication by 4. Therefore (×2)top=bottom1 on H1(Z[1]). This is exactly the commuting square asserted by [L1].

L1L2step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Relative homology of a composable pair of stalk complexes

Example

Fix nonzero integers m and n. For the composable pair Z[0]×mZ[0]×nZ[0], the relative homology groups are H0(D,C;×m)Z/m,H0(E,C;×nm)Z/(nm),H0(E,D;×n)Z/n, and all higher relative homology groups vanish. The long exact sequence of the pair therefore collapses to 0Z/m[x][nx]nmZ/(nm)Z/n0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nonzero integers m and n.

[L1]

A composable pair of chain maps has a long exact sequence of relative homology (The long exact sequence of relative homology for a composable pair).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Each relative homology group is the homology of a two-term cone complex with differential multiplication by m, nm, or n. Hence the displayed degree-0 groups are the corresponding cokernels and all higher groups vanish.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

With only degree-0 terms remaining, [L1] collapses to a short exact sequence. The first map is multiplication by n modulo nm, and the second is reduction modulo n, giving the displayed exact sequence.

L1step 1.1algebra

Sources