How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Long Exact Sequences in Homology - Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Set Theory Beyond Choice: Recorded, Not Proved Here
- Suprema and Infima
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
2 · Summary
These examples keep the page concrete: two-term and stalk complexes let the connecting maps, cone sequences, naturality squares, and relative-homology windows be computed directly on the nose.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The connecting map for a short exact sequence of two-term complexes
Example
Fix a nonzero integer . Consider the chain map and its canonical short exact cone sequence The middle term is a two-term complex, and its connecting morphism is multiplication by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero integer .
In module categories, the connecting map is computed by lifting a cycle and taking the boundary of the lift (Elementwise formula for the connecting map in module categories).
Verification
A class in is represented by an integer . In the cone sequence, is a lift of that cycle to degree of .
The cone differential sends to . Therefore [L1] gives So the connecting morphism is multiplication by .
A degreewise split sequence with nonzero connecting map
Example
Take the identity map . Its canonical cone sequence is degreewise split short exact, but its connecting morphism is nonzero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The identity map on the stalk complex .
Every canonical cone sequence is degreewise split short exact (The canonical mapping-cone sequence is degreewise split short exact).
For the identity map, the connecting morphism agrees with the shifted identity up to sign (The cone connecting map agrees with the shifted identity up to the declared sign).
Verification
The displayed cone sequence is degreewise split by [L1].
The source and target are both isomorphic to , and [L2] identifies the connecting map with on that group. Hence it is nonzero.
The cone long exact sequence for multiplication by m
Example
Fix a nonzero integer and consider the chain map Its cone long exact sequence contains the exact segment Hence
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero integer .
The cone of a chain map fits into a long exact homology sequence whose outer maps are the homology maps of the original chain map (The cone long exact sequence).
Verification
Since both source and target are stalk complexes in degree , their only nonzero homology group is . Applying [L1] to gives the displayed exact segment.
The map in the middle is multiplication by , so its kernel is and its cokernel is . Exactness identifies these with and respectively.
Two-out-of-three for a diagram of finite complexes
Example
Compare the cone sequences of and on : Take the vertical maps to be on the left, on the right, and the middle map that is multiplication by in degree and by in degree . The outer maps are obvious quasi-isomorphisms, so the middle one is too.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The morphism of short exact sequences described in the example.
In a morphism of short exact sequences, any two quasi-isomorphisms force the third (Two-out-of-three for quasi-isomorphisms in a short exact sequence diagram).
Verification
The left and right vertical maps are isomorphisms of stalk complexes, hence quasi-isomorphisms. With the left map also equal to , the middle vertical map commutes with the canonical inclusion and the projection to , so it is a morphism of short exact sequences; it is a chain map because it changes the sign in degree exactly as needed to compare the differentials and .
Both cone complexes have homology in degree and elsewhere, so the middle vertical map induces an isomorphism on homology. This agrees with the prediction of [L1]: once the outer two maps are quasi-isomorphisms, the third must be as well.
A six-term cohomology sequence
Example
Fix a nonzero integer . Let be the cochain complex with and all other terms zero, let have and all other terms zero, and let have with . Then is the short exact sequence whose component and component are the identity and whose other components are zero. Its associated long exact cohomology sequence collapses to where is multiplication by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonzero integer and the componentwise maps specified in the Example.
Short exact sequences of cochain complexes have long exact cohomology sequences (The long exact sequence in cohomology).
Verification
The three complexes have cohomology only in degrees and , and the only nontrivial differential is . By [L1], there is a long exact cohomology sequence. The groups immediately before and after are zero, so this long exact sequence collapses to the six displayed terms.
Here and . The connecting map sends to the class of , so is multiplication by . This exhibits the boundary as a degree-raising map.
Homology is not an exact functor
Statement refuted
Homology sends every short exact sequence of complexes to a short exact sequence in each degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The degreewise split cone sequence of the identity map on .
That sequence has a nonzero connecting morphism on homology (A degreewise split sequence with nonzero connecting map).
Counterexample
The given sequence is short exact term by term, but [L1] shows that its associated homology sequence contains a nonzero connecting map.
A degreewise short exact sequence of homology groups would have zero connecting map. Since the displayed sequence does not, it is a counterexample to exactness of homology.
Naturality of a connecting map under a map of coefficient sequences
Example
Compare the cone sequences of and on . There is a morphism of short exact sequences where is the identity in degree and multiplication by in degree . The connecting square commutes because the top connecting map is and the bottom one is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The morphism of cone sequences displayed in the example.
The homology connecting morphism is natural under morphisms of short exact sequences (Naturality of the homology connecting morphism).
In module categories, the connecting morphism is computed by the lift-boundary formula (Elementwise formula for the connecting map in module categories).
Verification
The map is a chain map because the top differential is multiplication by and the bottom one is multiplication by , so on degree . Thus the displayed diagram is a morphism of short exact sequences.
By [L2], the top connecting morphism is multiplication by and the bottom one is multiplication by . Therefore on . This is exactly the commuting square asserted by [L1].
Relative homology of a composable pair of stalk complexes
Example
Fix nonzero integers and . For the composable pair the relative homology groups are and all higher relative homology groups vanish. The long exact sequence of the pair therefore collapses to
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Nonzero integers and .
A composable pair of chain maps has a long exact sequence of relative homology (The long exact sequence of relative homology for a composable pair).
Verification
Each relative homology group is the homology of a two-term cone complex with differential multiplication by , , or . Hence the displayed degree- groups are the corresponding cokernels and all higher groups vanish.
With only degree- terms remaining, [L1] collapses to a short exact sequence. The first map is multiplication by modulo , and the second is reduction modulo , giving the displayed exact sequence.