Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A bundle map with rank drop is not a formal immersion

Statement refuted

Let M=N=R2, f=id, and let F:TR2→TR2 be the constant bundle map over the identity given in the standard trivializations by the matrix diag(1,0). Then F is smooth and covers f, but Fx has rank one at every point x, so (f,F) is not a formal immersion: fibrewise injectivity is a pointwise condition on every fibre, and it fails at every point. In particular a bundle map that is injective on a dense open set, or injective outside a proper closed subset, or of maximal rank outside a point, is not a formal immersion unless injectivity holds at every point; surjectivity of the base map or linearity of the bundle map do not substitute for the fibrewise condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=N=R2, f=id⁡R2, and the bundle map F:TR2→TR2 over f given in the standard trivializations TR2≅R2×R2 by the constant matrix diag⁡(1,0).

[F1]

A formal immersion is a pair (f,F) with f smooth and F a smooth bundle map over f whose restriction Fx:TxM→Tf(x)N is injective for every x (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds).

[F2]

A bundle map over f is a smooth map covering f and linear on each fibre; in a trivialization it is given by a matrix function of the base point (Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F2given

In the standard trivializations TR2≅R2×R2 the map F reads (x,ξ)↦(x,diag⁡(1,0)ξ)=(x,(ξ1,0)), a smooth map covering the identity whose restriction to each fibre is linear; by [F2] it is a smooth bundle map over f=id⁡R2.

1.2givenalgebra

At every x∈R2 the fibre map is Fx=diag⁡(1,0):R2→R2, whose kernel contains the nonzero vector (0,1); hence Fx is not injective at any point.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2∎

By [F1] the pair (id⁡,F) therefore fails the defining fibrewise-injectivity condition at every point and is not a formal immersion, although the base map is even a diffeomorphism. Injectivity on a dense open set or off a proper closed subset gives no conclusion at the remaining points: if any such fibre is noninjective, [F1] excludes a formal immersion; if all fibres are injective, the condition is satisfied. Neither surjectivity of the base map nor linearity of F replaces that condition.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources