Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Formal Immersions and the Smale Hirsch Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples test the definitions and the main theorem on the smallest nontrivial cases. The circle in the plane identifies formal immersions with nowhere-zero direction fields and hence with the rotation number; the standard sphere computes the normal bundle and the tangent-normal identity in the first even-dimensional case; an open parallelizable manifold applies the equidimensional open-source theorem; the torus shows that formally plausible rank data can fail to be holonomic for closed sources of codimension zero; and a constant bundle map of rank one on the plane exhibits the pointwise nature of fibrewise injectivity.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A bundle map with rank drop is not a formal immersion

Statement refuted

Let M=N=R2, f=id, and let F:TR2→TR2 be the constant bundle map over the identity given in the standard trivializations by the matrix diag(1,0). Then F is smooth and covers f, but Fx has rank one at every point x, so (f,F) is not a formal immersion: fibrewise injectivity is a pointwise condition on every fibre, and it fails at every point. In particular a bundle map that is injective on a dense open set, or injective outside a proper closed subset, or of maximal rank outside a point, is not a formal immersion unless injectivity holds at every point; surjectivity of the base map or linearity of the bundle map do not substitute for the fibrewise condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M=N=R2, f=id⁡R2, and the bundle map F:TR2→TR2 over f given in the standard trivializations TR2≅R2×R2 by the constant matrix diag⁡(1,0).

[F1]

A formal immersion is a pair (f,F) with f smooth and F a smooth bundle map over f whose restriction Fx:TxM→Tf(x)N is injective for every x (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds).

[F2]

A bundle map over f is a smooth map covering f and linear on each fibre; in a trivialization it is given by a matrix function of the base point (Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F2given

In the standard trivializations TR2≅R2×R2 the map F reads (x,ξ)↦(x,diag⁡(1,0)ξ)=(x,(ξ1,0)), a smooth map covering the identity whose restriction to each fibre is linear; by [F2] it is a smooth bundle map over f=id⁡R2.

1.2givenalgebra

At every x∈R2 the fibre map is Fx=diag⁡(1,0):R2→R2, whose kernel contains the nonzero vector (0,1); hence Fx is not injective at any point.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2∎

By [F1] the pair (id⁡,F) therefore fails the defining fibrewise-injectivity condition at every point and is not a formal immersion, although the base map is even a diffeomorphism. Injectivity on a dense open set or off a proper closed subset gives no conclusion at the remaining points: if any such fibre is noninjective, [F1] excludes a formal immersion; if all fibres are injective, the condition is satisfied. Neither surjectivity of the base map nor linearity of F replaces that condition.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

The standard sphere immersion and its normal line

Example

Let j:S2↪R3 be the standard unit sphere inclusion. Then (j,dj) is a formal immersion, and the normal bundle of the formal immersion is νdj=dj(TS2)⊥, the fibrewise orthogonal complement of the tangent planes of S2 in j∗TR3. The outward unit normal N(x)=x is a global nonvanishing section, so νdj≅ε1 is trivial, and the tangent-normal identity gives TS2⊕ε1  ≅  j∗TR3=ε3, the standard trivialization of the tangent bundle of S2 stabilised by one trivial line. The bundle isomorphism (v,a)↦v+ax therefore trivializes TS2⊕ε1; the inverse images of the standard basis vectors ei give the global frame x↦(ei−⟨ei,x⟩x,⟨ei,x⟩), i=1,2,3, while TS2 alone admits no nowhere-zero global section by A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field; hence the extra normal line is essential and the splitting is not a triviality of TS2. This verifies the tangent-normal identity in the first nontrivial even-dimensional case and provides the normal line used in the sphere-eversion computation on the next page.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard unit sphere inclusion j:S2↪R3 and the standard structures on TR3≅R3×R3 (The tangent bundle as a disjoint union).

[F1]

(j,dj) is a formal immersion whose fibres are injective, and the normal bundle of the formal immersion is νdj=dj(TS2)⊥, the orthogonal complement with respect to the standard metric (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Normal bundle of a formal immersion).

[L1]

The tangent-normal identity gives a smooth bundle isomorphism TS2⊕νdj≅j∗TR3 (Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity), and j∗TR3≅ε3 is the trivial rank-three bundle (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

For x∈S2 the tangent space TxS2 is the orthogonal complement of the radial line Rx in R3, and djx is the inclusion TxS2↪R3. Hence the normal line of dj at x is spanned by x, and the outward unit normal N(x):=x is a global smooth nonvanishing section of νdj.

2.1L1step 1.1∎

A line bundle with a global nonvanishing section is trivial, so νdj≅ε1; the tangent-normal identity of [L1] then gives TS2⊕ε1≅j∗TR3=ε3, and the isomorphism (v,a)↦v+ax pulls back the standard basis to the three smooth sections (ei−⟨ei,x⟩x,⟨ei,x⟩), which are a global frame because their images are a basis in every fibre.

Remarks

The failure of a nowhere-zero section of TS2 is proved by the identity-to-antipodal homotopy obstruction in A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field. The explicit normal-line verification above and that obstruction together distinguish stable triviality from triviality.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

An open parallelizable manifold immerses in Euclidean space of equal dimension

Example

Assume ACω. Let M be an open (no compact component) smooth m-manifold whose tangent bundle is trivial, TM≅M×Rm; for instance M=Rm minus a point, the open annulus S1×(0,1)⊂R2 in the case m=2, or any open subset of Rm. Then M immerses in Rm, and even every formal immersion M→Rm (equivalently, after fixing a global frame of TM and the standard frame of TRm, a pair consisting of a smooth map M→Rm and a smooth map M→GLm(R)) is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine immersion. Indeed a global frame of TM together with the standard frame of TRm defines a formal immersion (f,F) for every smooth f, and the open-source Smale–Hirsch theorem deforms it to a genuine immersion in the equidimensional case. For m≥1, a nonempty closed m-manifold is excluded by the equidimensional obstruction, so the open-source hypothesis is essential. In dimension zero an open manifold in this convention is empty; nonempty compact zero-manifolds do admit immersions into R0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω and an open (no compact component) smooth m-manifold M whose tangent bundle is trivial, TM≅M×Rm.

[F1]

A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, and a global frame is the same as a family of everywhere linearly independent sections (Local and global frames of a vector bundle, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame).

[L1]

The open-source Smale–Hirsch theorem: for an open source M and m≤n the derivative map D:Imm⁡(M,N)→FImm⁡(M,N) is a weak homotopy equivalence, with the relative parametric form; in particular every formal immersion is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine immersion (Smale–Hirsch for open source manifolds).

[L2]

A smooth map f:M→Rm together with a bundle map F:TM→TRm over f that is fibrewise injective is a formal immersion (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds); after fixing frames of both trivial bundles, smooth bundle maps TM→TRm over a fixed base correspond exactly to smooth matrix-valued maps M→Mat⁡m×m(R); the fibrewise injective maps correspond exactly to smooth maps M→GLm(R) (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1L2givenconstruct

Choose a global frame of TM by [F1] and the standard frame of TRm; for any smooth f:M→Rm, define F to be the bundle map over f that carries the frame of TM to the standard frame of TRm fibrewise. Then F is a fibrewise linear isomorphism, hence fibrewise injective, and (f,F) is a formal immersion by [L2].

2.1L1step 1.1

Since M has no compact component, [L1] applies in the equidimensional case m=n: the formal immersion (f,F) is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine immersion g:M→Rm, so M immerses in Rm and every formal immersion is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine one.

3.1L1step 2.1∎

For m≥1, a nonempty closed m-manifold is excluded: by the equidimensional obstruction A nonempty closed n-manifold cannot immerse in R-n for n at least one no nonempty closed m-manifold immerses in Rm, so openness of the source is essential; the examples M=Rm minus a point, the open annulus S1×(0,1)⊂R2, and open subsets of Rm have trivial tangent bundles and no compact component, so the theorem applies to them. For m=0, the no-compact-component condition forces M=∅, since each point is a compact component; its unique map to R0 is an immersion. The countable-choice assumption of [L1] is inherited.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A closed manifold with formally plausible rank data needs positive codimension

Statement refuted

The n-torus Tn=S1×⋯×S1 admits formal immersions into Rn for every n≥1: it is a product of circles, the standard angular fields give a global frame of TTn≅Tn×Rn, and the identity bundle map is fibrewise injective. Yet no nonempty closed n-manifold — in particular not Tn — admits an immersion into Rn. Thus the rank data TM⊕ν≅εn with ν of rank zero is formally plausible but geometrically impossible, and the equidimensional closed-source case genuinely needs the positive-codimension hypothesis; the Smale–Hirsch theorem is not contradicted, because its closed-source form requires m<n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The n-torus Tn=S1×⋯×S1 for n≥1.

[F1]

Use the finite product atlas obtained from the standard two-arc atlas of each circle. Its tangent charts have smooth derivative transitions and, together with the angular frame, explicitly identify TTn with the smooth product Tn×Rn; the finite atlas and a fixed rational-ball basis establish the tangent total-space structure without choice. Thus TTn is trivial: the product of the standard angular fields of the circle factors is a global frame, and a vector bundle with a global frame is trivial (Local and global frames of a vector bundle, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

[L1]

A vector bundle map over a base map that is a fibrewise linear isomorphism of trivialized bundles is fibrewise injective, hence determines a formal immersion (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds).

[L2]

No nonempty closed n-manifold admits an immersion into Rn (A nonempty closed n-manifold cannot immerse in R-n for n at least one); the closed-source form of the Smale–Hirsch theorem requires positive codimension m<n (The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1L1givenconstruct

For the explicitly constructed tangent bundles of [F1], the standard angular fields of the circle factors give a global frame of TTn, so TTn≅Tn×Rn by [F1]; pairing this frame with the standard frame of TRn defines the identity bundle map over any chosen smooth base map, in particular over a constant map, and this map is a fibrewise linear isomorphism, hence fibrewise injective. Thus (f,F) is a formal immersion Tn→Rn for every n≥1, and the rank data TTn⊕ν≅εn with ν of rank zero are formally realized.

2.1L2step 1.1

Yet no nonempty closed n-manifold, in particular not Tn, admits an immersion into Rn, by [L2]; the equidimensional obstruction applies verbatim to Tn, which is closed and nonempty. Hence the formal datum of step 1.1 is not holonomic, and the equidimensional closed-source case genuinely needs the positive-codimension hypothesis.

3.1L2step 2.1∎

The Smale–Hirsch theorem is not contradicted: its closed-source form requires m<n, so it makes no assertion about this example; the example shows the rank data alone do not force the existence of an immersion when the source is closed and the codimension is zero.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Immersing the circle in the plane from a formal line monomorphism

Example

Assume ACω. Give the unit circle its counterclockwise orientation and global tangent vector τ(x)=ix, identifying R2 with C. A formal immersion is uniquely described by a smooth base map f:S1→R2 and a nowhere-zero vector field v(x)=Fx(τ(x))∈R2. Write v=ℓu with ℓ>0 and u:S1→S1. The positive-length functions and base maps are contractible, so formal homotopy classes are classified by the degree of u. The Smale–Hirsch theorem and its component corollary identify these with regular homotopy classes of parametrized immersed plane curves. The derivative of the standard inclusion has u(x)=ix, of degree +1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the counterclockwise unit circle, its smooth global tangent vector τ(x)=ix, and the standard inclusion.

[F1]

A formal immersion is a smooth fibrewise linear injection over a smooth base map (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map).

[L1]

Smale–Hirsch in positive codimension and the component corollary identify formal homotopy classes with regular homotopy classes (The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem, Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes).

[L2]

Based circle loops are path-homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, and every integer is the degree of a standard loop (Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree, deg⁡(ωn)=n for every integer n, The degree of a based circle loop). Here the unit circle is identified with R/Z by t↦e2πit.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenconstruct

Since τ(x) is a basis of TxS1, Fx is determined by the nonzero vector v(x)=Fxτ(x), not just its unoriented image line. The smooth positive length ℓ(x)=∣v(x)∣ contracts to 1 through positive functions, while the base map contracts to the zero map in R2 without changing v in the target's standard trivialization. Thus a formal pair deforms to (0,u), where u=v/∣v∣ is a smooth unit-vector map.

2.1L2step 1.1construct

For a map u:S1→S1, normalize its value at 1 by α(x)=u(x)u(1)‾, a based loop. Choose one angular path from u(1) to 1; multiplying u by this path gives a free homotopy to α. A free homotopy us normalizes to the based homotopy us(x)us(1)‾, so its degree is invariant. Conversely equal degrees give a based homotopy of the normalized maps by [L2], and the angular paths undo the normalizations. Hence free homotopy classes are exactly the integer degrees. This classification applies to smooth maps and smooth homotopies: lifting a smooth normalized map to a real angle on [0,1], its angle is kt+h(t) with h smooth periodic; interpolation of periodic h to zero gives a smooth homotopy to e2πikt. Smoothness of the lift follows locally from the exponential's smooth inverse on an arc.

3.1L1L2step 1.1step 2.1∎

For an immersion f, the derivative direction is u(x)=dfx(τ(x))/∣dfx(τ(x))∣. For the standard inclusion it is ix; after normalization this is x=e2πit, of degree +1 by [L2]. The contractions in step 1.1 and the degree classification in step 2.1 identify formal homotopy classes with Z; [L1] transfers this classification to regular homotopy classes of the parametrized immersions.

Sources