How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Formal Immersions and the Smale Hirsch Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Direct Matrix Factorisations: LU, Cholesky and QR
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Formal Immersions and the Smale Hirsch Theorem
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Gradient Like Vector Fields and Morse Trajectories
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Handle Decompositions Duality and Rearrangement
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Hurewicz Whitehead Freudenthal and Cw Approximation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Leray–Hirsch, the Thom Isomorphism, and Gysin Sequences
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morse Critical Points Hessians and Indices
- Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Sublevel Deformation and the Handle Attachment Theorem
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification
- Topology of ℝ
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Whitney Embedding Tubular Neighbourhoods and Approximation
2 · Summary
These examples test the definitions and the main theorem on the smallest nontrivial cases. The circle in the plane identifies formal immersions with nowhere-zero direction fields and hence with the rotation number; the standard sphere computes the normal bundle and the tangent-normal identity in the first even-dimensional case; an open parallelizable manifold applies the equidimensional open-source theorem; the torus shows that formally plausible rank data can fail to be holonomic for closed sources of codimension zero; and a constant bundle map of rank one on the plane exhibits the pointwise nature of fibrewise injectivity.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A bundle map with rank drop is not a formal immersion
Statement refuted
Let , , and let be the constant bundle map over the identity given in the standard trivializations by the matrix . Then is smooth and covers , but has rank one at every point , so is not a formal immersion: fibrewise injectivity is a pointwise condition on every fibre, and it fails at every point. In particular a bundle map that is injective on a dense open set, or injective outside a proper closed subset, or of maximal rank outside a point, is not a formal immersion unless injectivity holds at every point; surjectivity of the base map or linearity of the bundle map do not substitute for the fibrewise condition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and the bundle map over given in the standard trivializations by the constant matrix .
A formal immersion is a pair with smooth and a smooth bundle map over whose restriction is injective for every (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds).
A bundle map over is a smooth map covering and linear on each fibre; in a trivialization it is given by a matrix function of the base point (Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).
Counterexample
In the standard trivializations the map reads , a smooth map covering the identity whose restriction to each fibre is linear; by [F2] it is a smooth bundle map over .
At every the fibre map is , whose kernel contains the nonzero vector ; hence is not injective at any point.
By [F1] the pair therefore fails the defining fibrewise-injectivity condition at every point and is not a formal immersion, although the base map is even a diffeomorphism. Injectivity on a dense open set or off a proper closed subset gives no conclusion at the remaining points: if any such fibre is noninjective, [F1] excludes a formal immersion; if all fibres are injective, the condition is satisfied. Neither surjectivity of the base map nor linearity of replaces that condition.
The standard sphere immersion and its normal line
Example
Let be the standard unit sphere inclusion. Then is a formal immersion, and the normal bundle of the formal immersion is , the fibrewise orthogonal complement of the tangent planes of in . The outward unit normal is a global nonvanishing section, so is trivial, and the tangent-normal identity gives the standard trivialization of the tangent bundle of stabilised by one trivial line. The bundle isomorphism therefore trivializes ; the inverse images of the standard basis vectors give the global frame , , while alone admits no nowhere-zero global section by A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field; hence the extra normal line is essential and the splitting is not a triviality of . This verifies the tangent-normal identity in the first nontrivial even-dimensional case and provides the normal line used in the sphere-eversion computation on the next page.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard unit sphere inclusion and the standard structures on (The tangent bundle as a disjoint union).
is a formal immersion whose fibres are injective, and the normal bundle of the formal immersion is , the orthogonal complement with respect to the standard metric (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Normal bundle of a formal immersion).
The tangent-normal identity gives a smooth bundle isomorphism (Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity), and is the trivial rank-three bundle (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).
Verification
For the tangent space is the orthogonal complement of the radial line in , and is the inclusion . Hence the normal line of at is spanned by , and the outward unit normal is a global smooth nonvanishing section of .
A line bundle with a global nonvanishing section is trivial, so ; the tangent-normal identity of [L1] then gives , and the isomorphism pulls back the standard basis to the three smooth sections , which are a global frame because their images are a basis in every fibre.
Remarks
The failure of a nowhere-zero section of is proved by the identity-to-antipodal homotopy obstruction in A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field. The explicit normal-line verification above and that obstruction together distinguish stable triviality from triviality.
An open parallelizable manifold immerses in Euclidean space of equal dimension
Example
Assume . Let be an open (no compact component) smooth -manifold whose tangent bundle is trivial, ; for instance minus a point, the open annulus in the case , or any open subset of . Then immerses in , and even every formal immersion (equivalently, after fixing a global frame of and the standard frame of , a pair consisting of a smooth map and a smooth map ) is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine immersion. Indeed a global frame of together with the standard frame of defines a formal immersion for every smooth , and the open-source Smale–Hirsch theorem deforms it to a genuine immersion in the equidimensional case. For , a nonempty closed -manifold is excluded by the equidimensional obstruction, so the open-source hypothesis is essential. In dimension zero an open manifold in this convention is empty; nonempty compact zero-manifolds do admit immersions into .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and an open (no compact component) smooth -manifold whose tangent bundle is trivial, .
A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, and a global frame is the same as a family of everywhere linearly independent sections (Local and global frames of a vector bundle, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame).
The open-source Smale–Hirsch theorem: for an open source and the derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence, with the relative parametric form; in particular every formal immersion is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine immersion (Smale–Hirsch for open source manifolds).
A smooth map together with a bundle map over that is fibrewise injective is a formal immersion (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds); after fixing frames of both trivial bundles, smooth bundle maps over a fixed base correspond exactly to smooth matrix-valued maps ; the fibrewise injective maps correspond exactly to smooth maps (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).
Verification
Choose a global frame of by [F1] and the standard frame of ; for any smooth , define to be the bundle map over that carries the frame of to the standard frame of fibrewise. Then is a fibrewise linear isomorphism, hence fibrewise injective, and is a formal immersion by [L2].
Since has no compact component, [L1] applies in the equidimensional case : the formal immersion is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine immersion , so immerses in and every formal immersion is homotopic through formal immersions to a genuine one.
For , a nonempty closed -manifold is excluded: by the equidimensional obstruction A nonempty closed n-manifold cannot immerse in R-n for n at least one no nonempty closed -manifold immerses in , so openness of the source is essential; the examples minus a point, the open annulus , and open subsets of have trivial tangent bundles and no compact component, so the theorem applies to them. For , the no-compact-component condition forces , since each point is a compact component; its unique map to is an immersion. The countable-choice assumption of [L1] is inherited.
A closed manifold with formally plausible rank data needs positive codimension
Statement refuted
The -torus admits formal immersions into for every : it is a product of circles, the standard angular fields give a global frame of , and the identity bundle map is fibrewise injective. Yet no nonempty closed -manifold — in particular not — admits an immersion into . Thus the rank data with of rank zero is formally plausible but geometrically impossible, and the equidimensional closed-source case genuinely needs the positive-codimension hypothesis; the Smale–Hirsch theorem is not contradicted, because its closed-source form requires .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The -torus for .
Use the finite product atlas obtained from the standard two-arc atlas of each circle. Its tangent charts have smooth derivative transitions and, together with the angular frame, explicitly identify with the smooth product ; the finite atlas and a fixed rational-ball basis establish the tangent total-space structure without choice. Thus is trivial: the product of the standard angular fields of the circle factors is a global frame, and a vector bundle with a global frame is trivial (Local and global frames of a vector bundle, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).
A vector bundle map over a base map that is a fibrewise linear isomorphism of trivialized bundles is fibrewise injective, hence determines a formal immersion (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds).
No nonempty closed -manifold admits an immersion into (A nonempty closed n-manifold cannot immerse in R-n for n at least one); the closed-source form of the Smale–Hirsch theorem requires positive codimension (The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem).
Counterexample
For the explicitly constructed tangent bundles of [F1], the standard angular fields of the circle factors give a global frame of , so by [F1]; pairing this frame with the standard frame of defines the identity bundle map over any chosen smooth base map, in particular over a constant map, and this map is a fibrewise linear isomorphism, hence fibrewise injective. Thus is a formal immersion for every , and the rank data with of rank zero are formally realized.
Yet no nonempty closed -manifold, in particular not , admits an immersion into , by [L2]; the equidimensional obstruction applies verbatim to , which is closed and nonempty. Hence the formal datum of step 1.1 is not holonomic, and the equidimensional closed-source case genuinely needs the positive-codimension hypothesis.
The Smale–Hirsch theorem is not contradicted: its closed-source form requires , so it makes no assertion about this example; the example shows the rank data alone do not force the existence of an immersion when the source is closed and the codimension is zero.
Immersing the circle in the plane from a formal line monomorphism
Example
Assume . Give the unit circle its counterclockwise orientation and global tangent vector , identifying with . A formal immersion is uniquely described by a smooth base map and a nowhere-zero vector field . Write with and . The positive-length functions and base maps are contractible, so formal homotopy classes are classified by the degree of . The Smale–Hirsch theorem and its component corollary identify these with regular homotopy classes of parametrized immersed plane curves. The derivative of the standard inclusion has , of degree .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the counterclockwise unit circle, its smooth global tangent vector , and the standard inclusion.
A formal immersion is a smooth fibrewise linear injection over a smooth base map (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map).
Smale–Hirsch in positive codimension and the component corollary identify formal homotopy classes with regular homotopy classes (The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem, Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes).
Based circle loops are path-homotopic exactly when their degrees agree, and every integer is the degree of a standard loop (Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree, for every integer , The degree of a based circle loop). Here the unit circle is identified with by .
Verification
Since is a basis of , is determined by the nonzero vector , not just its unoriented image line. The smooth positive length contracts to through positive functions, while the base map contracts to the zero map in without changing in the target's standard trivialization. Thus a formal pair deforms to , where is a smooth unit-vector map.
For a map , normalize its value at by , a based loop. Choose one angular path from to ; multiplying by this path gives a free homotopy to . A free homotopy normalizes to the based homotopy , so its degree is invariant. Conversely equal degrees give a based homotopy of the normalized maps by [L2], and the angular paths undo the normalizations. Hence free homotopy classes are exactly the integer degrees. This classification applies to smooth maps and smooth homotopies: lifting a smooth normalized map to a real angle on , its angle is with smooth periodic; interpolation of periodic to zero gives a smooth homotopy to . Smoothness of the lift follows locally from the exponential's smooth inverse on an arc.
For an immersion , the derivative direction is . For the standard inclusion it is ; after normalization this is , of degree by [L2]. The contractions in step 1.1 and the degree classification in step 2.1 identify formal homotopy classes with ; [L1] transfers this classification to regular homotopy classes of the parametrized immersions.
Sources
- Ralph L. Cohen, Bundles, Manifolds, and Homotopy, Ch. 7 §2 “Obstructions to the existence of embeddings and immersions, the Hirsch–Smale theorem”, printed pp. 226–232 (Theorem 7.5, Corollary 7.6)
- Andrew Ranicki, Algebraic and Geometric Surgery, Ch. 7 §7.4 “The Smale–Hirsch classification of immersions”, printed pp. 142–146 (Theorem 7.35, Proposition 7.39)
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lectures 5 & 6: The Hirsch–Smale theorem (notes by C. Elliott), PDF pp. 1–4: Lemma 1.1, Corollary 1.2, Lemma 1.3 (Hirsch–Smale Fibration Lemma, n > k), Theorems 1.5 and 1.7, Lemma 1.6, Lemma 1.9
- Janek Wilhelm, The Smale–Hirsch Immersion Theorem and other Applications to Closed Manifolds, §§1–2, PDF pp. 1–3 (Theorem 1, relative parametric C⁰-dense h-principle for immersions with q > n; microextension and local h-principle 8.3.1)
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 3: Immersion theory (notes by O. Gwilliam), PDF pp. 1–4: Proposition 2.2 (disk), Definition 2.5 (Serre fibration), Definition 2.6 and Proposition 2.7 (flexible sheaves)