How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The standard sphere immersion and its normal line
Example
Let be the standard unit sphere inclusion. Then is a formal immersion, and the normal bundle of the formal immersion is , the fibrewise orthogonal complement of the tangent planes of in . The outward unit normal is a global nonvanishing section, so is trivial, and the tangent-normal identity gives the standard trivialization of the tangent bundle of stabilised by one trivial line. The bundle isomorphism therefore trivializes ; the inverse images of the standard basis vectors give the global frame , , while alone admits no nowhere-zero global section by A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field; hence the extra normal line is essential and the splitting is not a triviality of . This verifies the tangent-normal identity in the first nontrivial even-dimensional case and provides the normal line used in the sphere-eversion computation on the next page.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard unit sphere inclusion and the standard structures on (The tangent bundle as a disjoint union).
is a formal immersion whose fibres are injective, and the normal bundle of the formal immersion is , the orthogonal complement with respect to the standard metric (Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Normal bundle of a formal immersion).
The tangent-normal identity gives a smooth bundle isomorphism (Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity), and is the trivial rank-three bundle (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).
Verification
For the tangent space is the orthogonal complement of the radial line in , and is the inclusion . Hence the normal line of at is spanned by , and the outward unit normal is a global smooth nonvanishing section of .
A line bundle with a global nonvanishing section is trivial, so ; the tangent-normal identity of [L1] then gives , and the isomorphism pulls back the standard basis to the three smooth sections , which are a global frame because their images are a basis in every fibre.
Remarks
The failure of a nowhere-zero section of is proved by the identity-to-antipodal homotopy obstruction in A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field. The explicit normal-line verification above and that obstruction together distinguish stable triviality from triviality.
Depends on
- Normal bundle of a formal immersion
- Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity
- Formal immersion between smooth manifolds
- Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps
- The tangent bundle as a disjoint union
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles
- A positive even sphere has no nowhere-zero tangent field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ralph L. Cohen, Bundles, Manifolds, and Homotopy, Ch. 7 §2 “Obstructions to the existence of embeddings and immersions, the Hirsch–Smale theorem”, printed pp. 226–232 (Theorem 7.5, Corollary 7.6) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Ranicki, Algebraic and Geometric Surgery, Ch. 7 §7.4 “The Smale–Hirsch classification of immersions”, printed pp. 142–146 (Theorem 7.35, Proposition 7.39) (standard reference, not scraped)