Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An analytic semigroup need not be norm continuous at zero

Statement refuted

Assume Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain) for the cited integral and semigroup suppliers.

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) for the Dirichlet eigenbasis witness.

The claim that a bounded analytic semigroup is norm continuous at the vertex, i.e. that ∥T(t)−I∥→0 as t↓0 whenever T is a bounded analytic semigroup, is false. Let Ω be a nonempty bounded open set and let A=ΔD be the Dirichlet Laplacian with heat semigroup T (The Dirichlet Laplacian generates an analytic heat semigroup, The analytic Dirichlet heat semigroup). Then T is a bounded analytic semigroup of angle π/2, but T(t)→I fails in the operator norm as t↓0: for every t>0 and every eigenfunction ej with eigenvalue −λj, ∥(T(t)−I)ej∥2=∣e−λjt−1∣ ∥ej∥2, and the right-hand side tends to 1 as j→∞ for fixed t>0 because λj→+∞; hence ∥T(t)−I∥≥1 for every t>0. In particular analyticity improves regularity in the time variable at positive times (Analytic semigroups are operator-norm differentiable away from zero) but does not upgrade strong continuity at the vertex to norm continuity; for a bounded generator the reverse conclusion holds (The analytic semigroup generated by a bounded operator).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a nonempty bounded open set Ω⊆Rn; the Dirichlet Laplacian A=ΔD with its heat semigroup T and eigenbasis {ej} with eigenvalues −λj, λj→+∞, normalised by ∥ej∥L2=1; and a fixed t>0.

[L1]

A=ΔD generates a contraction analytic semigroup T of maximal allowed angle π/2, hence a bounded analytic semigroup of angle π/2 (The Dirichlet Laplacian generates an analytic heat semigroup).

[L2]

The heat semigroup is given by the spectral series T(s)f=∑je−λjs(f,ej)L2ej with Aej=−λjej, so T(s)ej=e−λjsej for every s>0, and the eigenvalues satisfy λj→+∞ (The analytic Dirichlet heat semigroup, Discrete spectrum of a symmetric elliptic Dirichlet operator).

[L3]

In the setting of the smoothing theorem, t↦T(t) is of class C∞ on (0,∞) in the operator norm, with ddtT(t)=AT(t); no norm continuity or differentiability at 0 is asserted, and for an unbounded generator it fails (Analytic semigroups are operator-norm differentiable away from zero).

[L4]

For a bounded operator A∈B(X) the exponential series defines a uniformly continuous strongly continuous semigroup with generator A; in particular norm continuity at the vertex holds for bounded generators (The analytic semigroup generated by a bounded operator, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces).

[L5]

The operator norm is ∥S∥=sup⁡{∥Sx∥:∥x∥≤1} (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1L2L5givenalgebra

The eigenfunction computation. For t>0 and each basis eigenfunction ej of [L2], T(t)ej=e−λjtej, so (T(t)−I)ej=(e−λjt−1)ej and therefore ∥(T(t)−I)ej∥L2=∣e−λjt−1∣ ∥ej∥L2=∣e−λjt−1∣; since λj→+∞ and t>0 fixed, λjt→+∞ and e−λjt→0, so ∣e−λjt−1∣→1 along j, and ∥T(t)−I∥≥sup⁡j∣e−λjt−1∣=1 by [L5].

2.1step 1.1L1L3given

The semigroup is analytic but not norm continuous at zero. By [L1] T is a bounded analytic semigroup of angle π/2 generated by A, so [L3] makes t↦T(t) operator-norm differentiable at every t>0, while [step 1.1] shows ∥T(t)−I∥≥1 for every t>0; hence T(t)→I fails in operator norm as t↓0, and the failure is attached to the vertex, not to the analyticity on the open sector.

3.1step 1.1L2L4givenalgebra∎

Contrast with bounded generators. If the generator A were bounded, [L4] would make T uniformly continuous, in particular ∥T(t)−I∥→0; the computation of [step 1.1] together with Aej=−λjej from [L2] shows ∥Aej∥L2=λj→+∞ on the unit vectors ej, so the Dirichlet Laplacian is unbounded and the two conclusions are consistent; thus norm continuity at the vertex is not a consequence of analyticity but fails exactly for the unbounded-generator case, and the displayed estimate ∥T(t)−I∥≥1 is the explicit witness.

The same witness shows that T(t)→I in the norm topology fails maximally: the distance from T(t) to the identity is at least 1 along the eigenbasis. Strong continuity at the vertex is nevertheless asserted, since T(t)f→f in norm for each fixed f; only the uniform-in-f statement fails.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources