How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The canonical map of a hyperelliptic curve is not an embedding
Statement refuted
Assume AC, as required by the cited canonical-map theorem. For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , geometric hyperellipticity prevents the canonical map from being a closed immersion. After extending to an algebraic closure, the canonical map factors through a degree-two map to and the -fold Veronese embedding. It has generic degree two onto a rational normal curve; its generic geometric fiber has two distinct points, which the canonical map identifies. This does not assert that every closed fiber has two distinct points. If the degree-two map is defined over with target , the same factorization holds over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , and, after base extension to , a degree-two map . In the split case the map may already be given over .
The degree-two map is finite and surjective, and has degree two. (Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps, Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves)
The canonical bundle and canonical map commute with field extension. The canonical bundle is generated for , and the degree-two map gives ; the canonical map is the composition of with the -fold Veronese map. (The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception, A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space)
The Veronese map is a closed immersion. The actual target is reduced, since its standard affine charts have polynomial-domain coordinate rings. A closed immersion into this target that is surjective on points is an isomorphism: on each affine chart its defining ideal lies in every prime, hence in the nilradical, which is zero. (The Veronese map is a well-defined closed immersion, Closed immersions of schemes, Relative projective space from standard charts)
Smooth proper birational curves over a field are isomorphic. (Birational smooth proper curves are isomorphic)
Counterexample
Let be as in the given data. By [F2], after base extension the canonical map is where is the Veronese closed immersion. Its image is a rational normal curve, and the composite has generic degree two. If the composite were a closed immersion, then would be a closed immersion into the Veronese image: the surjection on coordinate rings for the composite factors through the coordinate ring of that image, which is isomorphic to the reduced scheme . Since is also finite and surjective, [F4] would make it an isomorphism, contradicting its degree two. Thus the canonical map is not a closed immersion. A -map that became a closed immersion would remain one after base extension, so the same conclusion holds over .
Proof technique: use the canonical Veronese factorization. Separability identifies the generic geometric fiber as two distinct points; it is not needed for the non-embedding argument.
(Veronese factorization and nonembedding.) By [F1] and [F2], has degree two, , and the canonical map factors through . Its generic degree onto the rational normal image is two. If this composite were a closed immersion, the coordinate-ring surjections would make a closed immersion into its Veronese image, which is isomorphic to the reduced scheme . The map is finite and surjective by [F1]; [F4] then makes it an isomorphism, contradicting degree two. This proves the nonembedding without assuming separability.
(Generic geometric fiber.) To describe the generic geometric fiber, work over . In characteristic different from two, a degree-two extension is separable. In characteristic two, a degree-two extension is either separable or purely inseparable. Suppose it were purely inseparable. Choose a generator with , and write with , . Since is perfect, choose such that and . The embedding , , extends to by sending to . Indeed, this element squares to , and is irreducible because the extension is purely inseparable of degree two. The resulting field embedding has image of degree two over ; since , its image is all of . Thus is birational to . Smooth proper birational curves are isomorphic, contradicting by [F5]. The degree-two map is therefore separable in characteristic two as well. Its generic geometric fiber consists of two distinct points, and the Veronese factorization identifies them under the canonical map. Special fibers may be ramified and need not have two distinct points.
(Numerical canonical data.) The canonical space has dimension , the canonical bundle has degree , and it is globally generated. Since the canonical map is not a closed immersion by step 1.1, base-point-freeness and these numerical data alone do not imply the embedding conclusion.
(Genus two.) For , the Veronese map in the factorization is the identity of . Thus after base extension the canonical map is the degree-two map itself, not an embedding.
Depends on
- The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2
- The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections
- Birational smooth proper curves are isomorphic
- Base points and base-point-free linear systems
- Closed immersions of schemes
- The Axiom of Choice
- Complete linear system
- Gonality
- Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps
- Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves
- Relative projective space from standard charts
- The Veronese map is a well-defined closed immersion
- A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space
- The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
114 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV) (standard reference, not scraped)