Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adjunction on a smooth plane quartic: the canonical bundle is the hyperplane bundle

Example

Assume AC, as required by the cited canonical-map criterion. Let k be a field and let C=V+(F)⊆Pk2 be a smooth plane quartic, a smooth projective plane curve of degree d=4.

Adjunction gives ωC≅OC(d−3)=OC(1), the restriction to C of the hyperplane bundle OP2(1); the genus is g(C)=(4−1)(4−2)/2=3, consistently with deg⁡kωC=4⋅1=4=2g−2. Since h0(C,ωC)=g=3, the space of canonical sections has dimension three, so the complete canonical linear system has projective dimension two. The restriction argument below identifies it with the coordinate sections, which generate OC(1) at every point and hence define the canonical morphism to P2.

That map is the given inclusion C↪P2: the twisted hypersurface sequence and its low-degree cohomology sequence, together with H0(P2,O(−3))=H1(P2,O(−3))=0, show that the restriction map H0(P2,O(1))→H0(C,OC(1)) is an isomorphism; hence ∣KC∣=∣H∣ is the linear system of lines and the canonical image of C is the plane quartic itself. In particular C is geometrically nonhyperelliptic, and the canonical bundle of a plane quartic is the hyperplane bundle; the canonical model of this genus-three curve is the plane quartic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k and a smooth plane quartic C=V+(F)⊆Pk2 of degree d=4.

[F1]

For a smooth plane curve C=V+(F)⊆Pk2 of degree d, ωC≅OC(d−3) and g(C)=(d−1)(d−2)/2; the degree of the hypersurface is deg⁡F=d. (Adjunction for smooth plane curves, The genus of a smooth plane curve in terms of its degree, degree projective hypersurface)

[F2]

For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus g, deg⁡kωC=2g−2 and h0(C,ωC)=g, and, when the complete canonical system ∣KC∣ is base-point-free and its section space is nonzero, it defines the canonical morphism (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Complete linear system, A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space).

[F3]

On Pk2 one has H1(P2,O(m))=0 for every m, H0(P2,O(−3))=0, and H0(P2,O(1)) is the space of linear forms; the twisting sheaves are the ones attached to the standard graded presentation. (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space, Twisting sheaf on Proj)

[F4]

If i:C↪Pk2 is the plane quartic, the published hypersurface sequence gives 0→OP2(−4)→⋅FOP2→i∗OC→0: the nonzero dehomogenizations of F are nonzerodivisors in the polynomial domain rings of the standard charts. The standard graded polynomial ring generated in degree one makes OP2(1) invertible, so tensoring preserves exactness. On each standard chart the quotient by the local equation F with the restricted twist identifies the last term with i∗OC(1), yielding 0→OP2(−3)→⋅FOP2(1)→i∗OC(1)→0. (Hypersurface cohomology sequence, Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings, Relative projective space from standard charts, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change, Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Twisting sheaf on Proj)

[F5]

The short exact sequence in [F4] gives a long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology, and closed-immersion pushforward identifies Hq(P2,i∗OC(1)) with Hq(C,OC(1)). In particular its low-degree segment is 0→H0(P2,O(−3))→H0(P2,O(1))→H0(C,OC(1))→H1(P2,O(−3)). (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology, Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward)

[F6]

For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus g≥2, the canonical map is a closed immersion exactly when g≥3 and the curve is geometrically nonhyperelliptic, meaning that its algebraic-closure base change has no degree-two map to P1. (The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception, Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps)

[F7]

For a divisor D on a smooth proper curve, the complete linear system ∣D∣ is the set of effective divisors linearly equivalent to D, and its dimension is ℓ(D)−1. (Complete linear system, Degree divisor proper curve)

Verification

Proof technique: specialize adjunction to d=4 and identify the canonical linear system with the linear system of lines via the restriction map.

1.1F1

By [F1] with d=4, ωC≅OC(1) and g(C)=(3)(2)/2=3.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

By [F2] and [F3], deg⁡kωC=4=2⋅3−2 and h0(C,ωC)=3; thus its complete canonical system has projective dimension two.

2.2F2F3F4F5step 1.1

The low-degree segment in [F5], together with the two vanishings in [F3], makes the restriction map H0(P2,O(1))→H0(C,OC(1)) an isomorphism. By Step 1.1, ωC≅OC(1), so the complete canonical system ∣KC∣=∣OC(1)∣ is exactly the linear system of lines cut on C by H0(P2,O(1)). The three restricted coordinate sections generate OC(1): at each point at least one coordinate is nonzero, and on that standard chart its section is a local frame. Hence the canonical system is base-point-free and its nonzero three-dimensional section space defines a morphism to P2 by [F2].

3.1F6step 2.2

Because ∣KC∣ is the restriction of the linear system of lines, the canonical map of C is the restriction of the inclusion C↪P2: it is a closed embedding, and its image is the plane quartic C itself. This embedding remains a closed embedding after extending k to kˉ, so [F6] shows that C is geometrically nonhyperelliptic. In particular it has no degree-two map to the split Pk1; its canonical model is the plane quartic.

4.1F2F7step 2.1∎

As a consistency check, the canonical divisor of C is cut by a line: deg⁡kKC=4 equals 2g−2 by Step 2.1, and the isomorphism ωC≅OC(1) of Step 1.1 is the statement that the canonical divisor class is the class of a hyperplane section, i.e. the hyperplane bundle.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

209 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources