How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Residues Serre Duality for Curves and the Full Riemann Roch Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Grothendieck Spectral Sequences and Computations
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Henselian Rings and Equicharacteristic Cohen Structure
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normalization Finiteness for Affine Domains
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Residues Serre Duality for Curves and the Full Riemann Roch Theorem
- Riemann Roch for Curves via Euler Characteristics
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Smooth-Projective Serre Duality and Flag-Variety Line Bundles
- Solvability by Radicals and Kummer Theory
- Spectral Sequences
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Formal Laurent Series Field ℝ((t⁻¹)): Cauchy Complete, Non-Archimedean, Not Complete
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
These examples and counterexamples run the page's residue, duality and Riemann–Roch results on explicit curves and divisors.
On the projective line with affine coordinate , the residues of at the points cut out by irreducible polynomials are computed from the Laurent expansion in a local parameter, and their sum is checked to vanish, including the point at infinity. Duality is unpacked for the twists and : the monomial bases pair into the coefficient of , exhibiting the perfect pairing in coordinates. The full Riemann–Roch theorem is verified on for every degree, and on a genus-one curve it gives for positive-degree line bundles.
Adjunction is applied to plane cubics and plane quartics: a smooth cubic has trivial canonical bundle while a smooth quartic has with genus three, recovering the hyperplane class. Three counterexamples record the sharpness of the standard thresholds: the canonical map of a hyperelliptic curve factors through the degree-two map to and so is not an embedding, a degree- line bundle on a hyperelliptic curve need not be base-point-free, and a degree- line bundle need not be very ample. A tame double cover of with simple branch points has its genus computed from the complete Riemann–Hurwitz formula with the different divisor, and one explicit principal part is carried through the residue pairing to compute a class of on the projective line.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Residues on the projective line and the vanishing of their sum
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited cohomology and residue suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a perfect field and let have homogeneous coordinates , affine coordinate on , and point at infinity . Every rational differential is with .
(1) Finite points. Let be a closed point of defined by a monic irreducible , and put . Since is perfect, is separable, is a unit at , and is a local parameter. If the completed local expansion is with , then the coefficient-trace definition gives Here is expanded as a unit power series in , since . For a simple pole this is ; for higher-order poles the positive powers in the unit expansion can also contribute. When is algebraically closed and is a rational point, this is the coefficient of in the Laurent expansion of .
(2) The point at infinity. On with , the local parameter is and Thus is the coefficient of in . In particular,
(3) Vanishing of the sum. The monomials have possible poles only at and ; their residues there cancel for and are both zero otherwise. For every rational differential on , the sum of its residues at all closed points is zero by the global residue theorem (The global residue theorem on a smooth proper curve over a perfect field). For example, has residues at , at , and at infinity.
(4) The Laurent-tail class. The principal part at the origin represents a class , where . Its positive residue sum is , so the class is nonzero. The space is one-dimensional. Under the fixed Gysin trace of Serre duality, its value is , the negative of the positive residue sum; in characteristic two these scalars coincide.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, a perfect field , with coordinate , a monic irreducible , and the finite-support principal part at the origin.
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cited cohomology, principal-parts, global-residue, and duality suppliers; the computations here make no additional choices. (The Axiom of Choice)
The standard charts are and , with on their overlap, and infinity has local parameter . Closed points in correspond to monic irreducible polynomials , with residue field . (Relative projective space from standard charts, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Degree divisor proper curve)
At , is a uniformizer. Since is perfect, the irreducible polynomial is separable, so is a unit modulo ; the chain rule gives . (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable)
At a closed point with finite separable residue field, residue is the field trace of the coefficient of in a local parameter ; the residue is independent of the chosen parameter. (Residue of a rational differential at a separable closed point, The residue is independent of the uniformizer)
Formal Laurent-series residue extracts the coefficient of exponent . (Formal Laurent series , their order, derivative, and residue)
Over a perfect field, the sum of residues of a rational differential on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve is zero. (The global residue theorem on a smooth proper curve over a perfect field)
The principal-parts presentation represents by finite-support local principal parts modulo rational principal parts. In particular, a single local Laurent tail at the rational origin gives a class. (H^1 of a line bundle on a curve as principal parts modulo meromorphic and regular sections, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors)
For , . The fixed normalized Gysin trace on is the negative of the positive residue-sum functional over a perfect field. (h^1 of a line bundle equals the dimension of the space of dual sections, Normalization of the trace for Serre duality on a curve)
Verification
Proof technique: compute local coefficients in the two standard charts; use the global residue theorem for arbitrary rational differentials.
At , [F3] makes a uniformizer and a unit. Since , one has ; the coefficient-trace formula [F4] gives . For a simple pole the coefficient is ; higher-order poles use the full unit expansion.
At , and , so [F4] gives for and otherwise. At infinity, , whose coefficient is exactly for and otherwise. Thus the monomial residues sum to zero.
The global residue theorem [F6] supplies the vanishing of the residue sum for every rational differential; the monomial calculation in step 1.2 is only the displayed special case. This does not require writing an arbitrary rational differential as a finite Laurent polynomial plus exact terms.
For , gives residues and at and . At infinity, , which has no term. The sum is therefore zero.
The single principal part at has positive residue sum by step 1.2. By [F6], rational principal parts have total residue zero; regular local parts have zero residue, so this functional detects a nonzero cohomology class by [F7]. Since by [F8], it generates the group. The fixed trace is on this class by [F8], not except in characteristic two.
Serre duality on the projective line, twist by twist
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited cohomology and duality suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be any field, let have homogeneous coordinates and affine coordinate on , fix , and set .
The groups and have dimension ; all other cohomology groups of these two twists vanish. For , let where the displayed expression is the local principal part in the frame on . For , the corresponding global section of is On , with , its expression is so it is regular for exactly the stated range ; under and it corresponds to .
At the rational origin, the positive local residue of the product is This is the identity matrix when the classes are ordered by and sections by . Reversing the section order to displays the same positive matrix as anti-diagonal. The fixed normalized Serre pairing is the negative of this matrix. This remains perfect over every field; for its value is , which equals in characteristic two.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, a field , with coordinate , an integer , and .
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the projective cohomology, principal-parts, field-extension, and duality suppliers, and is used to take an algebraic closure in step 2.1. No other selection is made. (The Axiom of Choice)
On , has basis for , and has Laurent basis with and ; both groups have dimension . (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)
The standard frames satisfy on the overlap, , and . Also maps to and maps to under . Thus and corresponds to . The sheaves are invertible and . (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Relative projective space from standard charts, Invertible sheaves, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors)
Principal parts give the cokernel description of ; in particular, each finite-support tail in the frame represents the class . (H^1 of a line bundle on a curve as principal parts modulo meromorphic and regular sections)
At the rational origin with parameter , the local residue of is its coefficient. Over a perfect field, the positive residue pairing is the sum of these local residues. (Residue of a rational differential at a separable closed point, The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist)
For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, the fixed normalized Gysin trace and its Serre pairing are defined over every field. Over a perfect field the trace pairing is the negative of the positive residue pairing. (Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization, Normalization of the trace for Serre duality on a curve)
For a proper scheme, coherent cohomology commutes with arbitrary field extension. The fixed Gysin trace and its cup/evaluation pairing also commute with extension of the base field. (Flat field extension commutes with coherent cohomology, Embedding compatibility of smooth-projective Gysin traces)
On , : its canonical degree is , and the Picard group is classified by degree. (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, The Picard group of the projective line, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Degree divisor proper curve, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors)
Verification
Proof technique: identify the Laurent-tail and section bases, compute the positive residue matrix at the rational origin, then descend the fixed-trace sign from an algebraic closure.
By [F2], and have dimension . For , the single tail in the frame is a finite-support principal part at the rational origin, and by [F4] it represents the class .
By [F3], has expression , hence is regular for . Under and it corresponds to , so these sections form the basis of the dual canonical twist.
At the rational point , the product of the local principal part and section is , whose positive local residue is by [F5]. Choose an algebraic closure ; it is perfect, so [F6] gives . The class and section defined over pull back to the same expressions over .
By [F7], cohomology classes, cup products and the fixed Gysin trace commute with . Thus maps to in ; injectivity of gives the same scalar over . In ascending orders the normalized matrix is ; reversing the section order to makes it anti-diagonal with entries . Because the form a basis by step 1.2, invertibility of this matrix proves that the classes are independent; their number equals by step 1.1, so they form a basis.
By [F8], , so the bases above are those of the two Serre-dual spaces. The explicit normalized matrix is perfect, in agreement with the arbitrary-field duality pairing [F6]. For it is , and characteristic two identifies with .
The full Riemann-Roch theorem on the projective line, in every degree
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it supplies Dependent Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice. Let be a field, let with point at infinity , and let be a divisor on of degree .
Every divisor on is linearly equivalent to , and with mapping to under . Hence and because is the degree- part of for and vanishes for .
The canonical divisor satisfies and with , so and
Subtracting, so the full Riemann-Roch identity holds on the projective line for every integer degree, including the negative range. The special divisors are exactly those of degree , with index of speciality , while the divisors of degree are nonspecial with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and its consequence Dependent Choice; a field , the projective line with point at infinity , and a divisor of degree .
Every divisor on is linearly equivalent to , and the associated invertible sheaf of is ; the divisor and invertible-sheaf dictionaries agree on . (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor)
, the class of corresponding to ; hence for of degree , and is the dimension of the Riemann-Roch space of . (The Picard group of the projective line, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D))
On , is the degree- part of , of dimension for , and is for ; the twisting sheaves are the ones attached to the standard charts. (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space, Twisting sheaf on Proj)
For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , the canonical divisor has degree ; on the genus is , so , and with because every degree- divisor is linearly equivalent to . (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Degree divisor proper curve, [F1])
The full Riemann-Roch theorem states for a divisor on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over an arbitrary field, and the index of speciality is , with nonspecial when . (The full Riemann-Roch theorem for divisors on a smooth proper curve, The index of speciality i(D), Special and nonspecial divisors)
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
In ZF, the Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice; this supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the Cartier-to-Weil divisor dictionary used in [F1] and [F4]. (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Verification
Proof technique: reduce an arbitrary divisor to the model and read off both dimensions from the twisting-sheaf cohomology.
By [F1] and [F2], , so and .
By [F3] applied to and , for and for , while [F4] gives and hence equals when (that is ) and when ; the case is the boundary , where the section space vanishes.
Taking the three ranges separately: for the difference is ; for it is ; for it is . In every case because by [F4], which is exactly the Riemann-Roch identity of [F5].
The index of speciality of [F5] is , which is precisely for and for ; hence the special divisors of are exactly the divisors of degree at most , and all divisors of degree at least are nonspecial.
The Axiom of Choice is used through the divisor dictionary and the full Riemann-Roch supplier; [F7] supplies the Dependent Choice premise required by the Cartier-to-Weil part of that dictionary.
A degree-n line bundle on a genus-one curve has an n-dimensional space of sections for n > 0
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it supplies Dependent Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice. Let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus one over a field , and let be an invertible sheaf of degree , with associated divisor under the divisor--invertible-sheaf dictionary.
Since , the line bundle is nonspecial: Equivalently, since for a genus-one curve, Serre duality reads because forces the vanishing of the sections of the negative-degree dual.
For the space of sections is one-dimensional. Under an isomorphism , a nonzero section corresponds to a nonzero rational function , and its zero divisor is . This is effective by the definition of and has degree , since principal divisors have degree zero. Thus for a closed point with , so is -rational. The same argument applies to every degree-one divisor ; its complete linear system has the single effective member . The dimension formula recovers this for and shows that the complete linear system grows by exactly one dimension for each added degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and its consequence Dependent Choice; a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus one over a field , an invertible sheaf of degree , and the associated divisor .
For an invertible sheaf of degree on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , and ; equivalently for divisors of degree . (H^1 of a line bundle vanishes above degree 2g - 2, Riemann-Roch in exact form for divisors of degree above 2g - 2)
The full Riemann-Roch theorem reads ; the line bundle associated with has , and the degree of is . (The full Riemann-Roch theorem for divisors on a smooth proper curve, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D), Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve)
On a genus-one curve , and Serre duality for invertible sheaves gives ; a line bundle of degree has no nonzero global section. (The canonical bundle of a genus-one curve is trivial, Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization, Negative-degree line bundles have no nonzero sections)
The dimension of the complete linear system of a divisor is , where is the index of speciality. Under an isomorphism , a nonzero global section corresponds to a nonzero ; its zero divisor is the effective divisor , of degree because principal divisors have degree zero. (The dimension of a complete linear system, Complete linear system, The space L(D), Degree divisor proper curve, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Principal divisors on a normal proper curve have degree zero)
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
In ZF, the Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice; this supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the Cartier-to-Weil dictionary used in [F2] and [F4]. (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Verification
Proof technique: apply the nonspecial Riemann-Roch formula and check the degree-one case separately, with Serre duality as an independent computation of .
Since we have , and gives ; by [F1] applied to , and .
Independently, [F3] gives up to the identification , and , so [F3] again gives ; this agrees with Step 1.1 and confirms that is nonspecial.
For , Step 1.1 gives . Choose a nonzero section and an isomorphism ; the section corresponds to a nonzero , and [F4] gives the effective zero divisor . By [F4] and the degree-zero theorem for principal divisors, . Hence for a closed point with residue degree one, so is -rational and . Since , the complete linear system has exactly the single effective member . This argument applies to every degree-one divisor.
The dimension formula of [F4] gives , with by Step 1.1; for this says in agreement with Step 2.2, and each increase of the degree by one increases by exactly one.
The Axiom of Choice is used through the duality, degree, and divisor suppliers; [F6] supplies the Dependent Choice premise required by the Cartier-to-Weil divisor dictionary.
Adjunction on a smooth plane cubic: the canonical bundle is trivial
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it supplies Dependent Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice. Let be a field and let be a smooth plane cubic: a smooth projective plane curve of degree , so is a smooth projective geometrically integral curve over .
Adjunction for smooth plane curves gives and the genus formula gives , consistently with . Since and has degree with a nonzero global section, is trivial; equivalently, every canonical divisor of is a principal divisor, and the canonical class is the zero element of .
The complete canonical linear system therefore has dimension and its associated canonical morphism has target . Thus the complete canonical linear system has no positive-dimensional projective target. This is the exceptional case of the genus-one behaviour: the degree-three line bundle at a -rational point is what embeds such a curve as a plane cubic, conversely to the computation above.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and its consequence Dependent Choice; a field and a smooth plane cubic of degree .
For a smooth plane curve of degree , adjunction gives , and the genus is ; the degree of the degree- hypersurface is . (Adjunction for smooth plane curves, The genus of a smooth plane curve in terms of its degree, degree projective hypersurface)
For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , and , with the canonical bundle. (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Degree divisor proper curve)
An invertible sheaf of degree on a smooth proper curve that has a nonzero global section is trivial; equivalently, an effective divisor of degree is , so a degree-zero divisor whose sheaf has a section is principal. (A degree-zero line bundle with a nonzero section is trivial, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Invertible sheaves)
A genus-one curve over with a -rational point embeds as a smooth plane cubic via the degree-three very ample invertible sheaf ; and on a genus-one curve the canonical bundle is trivial. (A genus-one curve with a rational point embeds as a plane cubic, The canonical bundle of a genus-one curve is trivial)
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
In ZF, the Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice; this supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the Cartier-to-Weil dictionary used in [F3] and the cited genus-one and degree suppliers. (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Verification
Proof technique: specialize adjunction and the genus formula to , then apply the degree-zero triviality criterion.
By [F1] with , and .
By [F2] with , and ; the unique one-dimensional space of sections is nonzero, so [F3] applies to the degree-zero invertible sheaf and shows ; equivalently every canonical divisor is principal and the canonical class is in .
Conversely, if is a genus-one curve over with a -rational point , then has degree , so by [F4] it is very ample and embeds as a plane cubic; thus every genus-one curve with a rational point has a smooth plane-cubic model. The forward calculation applies to every smooth plane cubic without assuming a rational point: its canonical class is zero in . This proves the stated converse implication and does not imply that every smooth plane cubic has a rational point.
Since , the complete canonical linear system has dimension and its associated complete canonical morphism has target ; it supplies no positive-dimensional canonical target. This matches the direct computation of Step 2.1 and the general genus-one statement [F4].
The Axiom of Choice is used through the cohomology, degree, and divisor suppliers; [F6] supplies the Dependent Choice premise used by the Cartier-to-Weil divisor dictionary.
Adjunction on a smooth plane quartic: the canonical bundle is the hyperplane bundle
Example
Assume AC, as required by the cited canonical-map criterion. Let be a field and let be a smooth plane quartic, a smooth projective plane curve of degree .
Adjunction gives the restriction to of the hyperplane bundle ; the genus is , consistently with . Since , the space of canonical sections has dimension three, so the complete canonical linear system has projective dimension two. The restriction argument below identifies it with the coordinate sections, which generate at every point and hence define the canonical morphism to .
That map is the given inclusion : the twisted hypersurface sequence and its low-degree cohomology sequence, together with , show that the restriction map is an isomorphism; hence is the linear system of lines and the canonical image of is the plane quartic itself. In particular is geometrically nonhyperelliptic, and the canonical bundle of a plane quartic is the hyperplane bundle; the canonical model of this genus-three curve is the plane quartic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a field and a smooth plane quartic of degree .
For a smooth plane curve of degree , and ; the degree of the hypersurface is . (Adjunction for smooth plane curves, The genus of a smooth plane curve in terms of its degree, degree projective hypersurface)
For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , and , and, when the complete canonical system is base-point-free and its section space is nonzero, it defines the canonical morphism (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Complete linear system, A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space).
On one has for every , , and is the space of linear forms; the twisting sheaves are the ones attached to the standard graded presentation. (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space, Twisting sheaf on Proj)
If is the plane quartic, the published hypersurface sequence gives : the nonzero dehomogenizations of are nonzerodivisors in the polynomial domain rings of the standard charts. The standard graded polynomial ring generated in degree one makes invertible, so tensoring preserves exactness. On each standard chart the quotient by the local equation with the restricted twist identifies the last term with , yielding . (Hypersurface cohomology sequence, Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings, Relative projective space from standard charts, Closed immersions are affine quotients and survive base change, Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Twisting sheaf on Proj)
The short exact sequence in [F4] gives a long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology, and closed-immersion pushforward identifies with . In particular its low-degree segment is . (Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology, Closed immersion preserves cohomology and coherent pushforward)
For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , the canonical map is a closed immersion exactly when and the curve is geometrically nonhyperelliptic, meaning that its algebraic-closure base change has no degree-two map to . (The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception, Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps)
For a divisor on a smooth proper curve, the complete linear system is the set of effective divisors linearly equivalent to , and its dimension is . (Complete linear system, Degree divisor proper curve)
Verification
Proof technique: specialize adjunction to and identify the canonical linear system with the linear system of lines via the restriction map.
By [F1] with , and .
By [F2] and [F3], and ; thus its complete canonical system has projective dimension two.
The low-degree segment in [F5], together with the two vanishings in [F3], makes the restriction map an isomorphism. By Step 1.1, , so the complete canonical system is exactly the linear system of lines cut on by . The three restricted coordinate sections generate : at each point at least one coordinate is nonzero, and on that standard chart its section is a local frame. Hence the canonical system is base-point-free and its nonzero three-dimensional section space defines a morphism to by [F2].
Because is the restriction of the linear system of lines, the canonical map of is the restriction of the inclusion : it is a closed embedding, and its image is the plane quartic itself. This embedding remains a closed embedding after extending to , so [F6] shows that is geometrically nonhyperelliptic. In particular it has no degree-two map to the split ; its canonical model is the plane quartic.
As a consistency check, the canonical divisor of is cut by a line: equals by Step 2.1, and the isomorphism of Step 1.1 is the statement that the canonical divisor class is the class of a hyperplane section, i.e. the hyperplane bundle.
The canonical map of a hyperelliptic curve is not an embedding
Statement refuted
Assume AC, as required by the cited canonical-map theorem. For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , geometric hyperellipticity prevents the canonical map from being a closed immersion. After extending to an algebraic closure, the canonical map factors through a degree-two map to and the -fold Veronese embedding. It has generic degree two onto a rational normal curve; its generic geometric fiber has two distinct points, which the canonical map identifies. This does not assert that every closed fiber has two distinct points. If the degree-two map is defined over with target , the same factorization holds over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus , and, after base extension to , a degree-two map . In the split case the map may already be given over .
The degree-two map is finite and surjective, and has degree two. (Hyperelliptic curves and hyperelliptic maps, Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves)
The canonical bundle and canonical map commute with field extension. The canonical bundle is generated for , and the degree-two map gives ; the canonical map is the composition of with the -fold Veronese map. (The canonical map: base-point-freeness and the hyperelliptic exception, A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space)
The Veronese map is a closed immersion. The actual target is reduced, since its standard affine charts have polynomial-domain coordinate rings. A closed immersion into this target that is surjective on points is an isomorphism: on each affine chart its defining ideal lies in every prime, hence in the nilradical, which is zero. (The Veronese map is a well-defined closed immersion, Closed immersions of schemes, Relative projective space from standard charts)
Smooth proper birational curves over a field are isomorphic. (Birational smooth proper curves are isomorphic)
Counterexample
Let be as in the given data. By [F2], after base extension the canonical map is where is the Veronese closed immersion. Its image is a rational normal curve, and the composite has generic degree two. If the composite were a closed immersion, then would be a closed immersion into the Veronese image: the surjection on coordinate rings for the composite factors through the coordinate ring of that image, which is isomorphic to the reduced scheme . Since is also finite and surjective, [F4] would make it an isomorphism, contradicting its degree two. Thus the canonical map is not a closed immersion. A -map that became a closed immersion would remain one after base extension, so the same conclusion holds over .
Proof technique: use the canonical Veronese factorization. Separability identifies the generic geometric fiber as two distinct points; it is not needed for the non-embedding argument.
(Veronese factorization and nonembedding.) By [F1] and [F2], has degree two, , and the canonical map factors through . Its generic degree onto the rational normal image is two. If this composite were a closed immersion, the coordinate-ring surjections would make a closed immersion into its Veronese image, which is isomorphic to the reduced scheme . The map is finite and surjective by [F1]; [F4] then makes it an isomorphism, contradicting degree two. This proves the nonembedding without assuming separability.
(Generic geometric fiber.) To describe the generic geometric fiber, work over . In characteristic different from two, a degree-two extension is separable. In characteristic two, a degree-two extension is either separable or purely inseparable. Suppose it were purely inseparable. Choose a generator with , and write with , . Since is perfect, choose such that and . The embedding , , extends to by sending to . Indeed, this element squares to , and is irreducible because the extension is purely inseparable of degree two. The resulting field embedding has image of degree two over ; since , its image is all of . Thus is birational to . Smooth proper birational curves are isomorphic, contradicting by [F5]. The degree-two map is therefore separable in characteristic two as well. Its generic geometric fiber consists of two distinct points, and the Veronese factorization identifies them under the canonical map. Special fibers may be ramified and need not have two distinct points.
(Numerical canonical data.) The canonical space has dimension , the canonical bundle has degree , and it is globally generated. Since the canonical map is not a closed immersion by step 1.1, base-point-freeness and these numerical data alone do not imply the embedding conclusion.
(Genus two.) For , the Veronese map in the factorization is the identity of . Thus after base extension the canonical map is the degree-two map itself, not an embedding.
Degree 2g-1 does not force base-point-freeness
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it supplies Dependent Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice. The theorem that a line bundle of degree at least on a curve of genus is base-point-free is sharp in its degree bound: a line bundle of degree need not be base-point-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and its consequence Dependent Choice; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over with a -rational point , and the invertible sheaf with associated divisor .
, so ; and the divisor--invertible-sheaf dictionary identifies and . (The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Degree divisor proper curve, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve)
For a divisor of degree on a curve of genus the nonspecial formula gives and ; equivalently has . (Riemann-Roch in exact form for divisors of degree above 2g - 2, H^1 of a line bundle vanishes above degree 2g - 2, The full Riemann-Roch theorem for divisors on a smooth proper curve, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D))
, where is the canonical bundle; the Riemann-Roch space of is the space of holomorphic differentials. (The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections, The space L(D))
A closed point is a base point of the complete linear system of a divisor exactly when every global section of vanishes at , equivalently ; the sheaf is base-point-free when no closed point is a base point. (Base points and base-point-free linear systems)
A line bundle of degree at least on a curve of genus is base-point-free; this is the statement whose degree bound is tested here. (Line bundles of degree at least 2g are base-point-free)
On a genus-one curve, the canonical bundle is trivial and every canonical divisor is principal; hence and . The divisor-line-bundle dictionary identifies this linear equivalence with the corresponding isomorphism of invertible sheaves. (The canonical bundle of a genus-one curve is trivial, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve)
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
In ZF, the Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice; this supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the Cartier-to-Weil divisor dictionary used in [F1] and [F6]. (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Counterexample
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it supplies Dependent Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice. Let be a field, let be a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over with a -rational point , let be a canonical divisor and put Then , and since the nonspecial formula gives On the other hand has by the canonical-sections computation, and is an inclusion of spaces of the same dimension ; hence the two spaces are equal and every global section of vanishes at . Therefore is a base point of the complete linear system , and is not base-point-free even though its degree is the largest value below the safe bound of the base-point-freeness theorem. For , [F6] gives , so ; its unique section has zero divisor and vanishes at .
Proof technique: compute both section spaces and observe that the evaluation at has no room to be nonzero.
By [F1], , so [F2] applies and gives together with .
Since by [F1] and by [F3], the space has dimension ; by the inclusion of [F1] and Step 1.1, is an inclusion of -vector spaces of the same dimension , hence an equality.
The equality of Step 2.1 says exactly that every global section of vanishes at the -rational point ; by the base-point criterion [F4], is a base point of the complete linear system and is not base-point-free.
Since , this counterexample shows that the degree bound in the base-point-freeness theorem [F5] cannot be lowered from to : the bound is sharp.
For , [F6] gives (the chosen representative need not equal the zero divisor), so . Step 1.1 gives , and this isomorphism makes one-dimensional. Its canonical section has zero divisor , so the unique one-dimensional section space vanishes at , in agreement with Step 3.1. The Axiom of Choice is used through the degree, duality, and divisor suppliers, and [F8] supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the Cartier-to-Weil route.
Degree 2g does not force very ampleness
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Choice; it supplies Dependent Choice through AC implies DC implies countable choice. The theorem that every line bundle of degree at least on a curve of genus is very ample is sharp over any field when the curve has a -rational point: for a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus with , the line bundle has degree and need not be very ample. When is algebraically closed, every closed point is -rational, so this includes the algebraically closed-field case.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and its consequence Dependent Choice; a field , a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over , a -rational point , a canonical divisor , and the invertible sheaf .
On an integral proper curve over a field, divisors are finite integral sums of closed points and ; since the given point is -rational, . Moreover for every choice of the nonzero rational differential defining , the sheaf satisfies , and under the divisor--invertible-sheaf dictionary and , with the corresponding inclusions of spaces of global sections. (Degree divisor proper curve, The canonical divisor has degree 2g - 2, Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve)
For a divisor of degree on a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus the nonspecial formula holds: and , equivalently . (Riemann-Roch in exact form for divisors of degree above 2g - 2, H^1 of a line bundle vanishes above degree 2g - 2, The full Riemann-Roch theorem for divisors on a smooth proper curve, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D))
for any canonical divisor . (The canonical bundle has exactly g independent sections, The Riemann-Roch dimension l(D))
A closed point is a base point of the complete linear system of a divisor exactly when , equivalently when every global section of vanishes at ; is base-point-free when it has no base point. A base-point-free subspace of dimension defines a morphism with ; its system members are the pullbacks of hyperplanes. Conversely, if a morphism is equipped with an isomorphism , its pulled-back coordinate sections form an ordered generating tuple, and the projective-data theorem reconstructs from that tuple. Their span is a base-point-free subspace of , but may have dimension less than ; equality with the basis morphism from the span up to a projective-linear change applies when the pulled-back coordinates are linearly independent. (Base points and base-point-free linear systems, Complete linear system, A base-point-free linear system defines a morphism to projective space, Maps to projective space equal generating line-bundle data)
An invertible -module is closed -very ample relative to when there is a closed immersion with ; -very ample relative to means such an immersion exists that is quasi-compact. A locally closed immersion has injective differential at every point of its source (for a closed immersion this is the injectivity of the induced maps of Zariski tangent spaces, and an open immersion is an isomorphism onto its image); in particular an immersion has at every closed point of , because the tangent space of the smooth curve is one-dimensional. (Relative very ampleness in the finite projective-space convention)
The very-ampleness theorem whose degree bound is tested here: if , then is closed -very ample relative to and the associated morphism is a closed immersion. (Line bundles of degree at least 2g+1 are very ample)
The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
In ZF, the Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice; this supplies the Dependent Choice premise of the Cartier-to-Weil divisor dictionary used in [F1] and the cited divisor suppliers. (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
On a genus-one curve, every canonical divisor satisfies by The canonical bundle of a genus-one curve is trivial. A nonconstant morphism of smooth proper curves is finite, and the degree of a pulled-back line bundle is the map degree times its degree; on , . Also , so a constant -morphism from to has image a -rational point and pulls back to a trivial line bundle. (Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves, Fibres, pullbacks and degrees of divisors under a finite morphism of curves, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Functions on a proper curve)
Assuming AC as inherited from the duality suppliers, if is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve of genus over any field and an invertible sheaf has degree at least , then is base-point-free and its complete linear system defines a -morphism to pulling back to . (Line bundles of degree at least 2g are base-point-free)
Counterexample
Proof technique: compute the image of the evaluation map on two-jets at ; it is one-dimensional, so no immersion with pullback can be nonzero on tangent spaces at .
Since is -rational, , so and ; moreover and as subsheaves of the sheaf of rational sections.
Let be any -morphism with an isomorphism . Put for the projective coordinates . The projective-data theorem in [F4] says that these sections form an ordered generating tuple and reconstruct from that tuple. Their span is base-point-free, but its dimension may be less than if the coordinate sections are linearly dependent.
The Axiom of Choice is used through the degree, duality, linear-system, and projective-data suppliers; [F8] supplies Dependent Choice for the Cartier-to-Weil divisor route.
Local computation at : since the tuple in Step 1.2 generates , one of its coordinate sections is nonzero at ; after renumbering coordinates call it . Use as a local frame to identify with , where the jet of is the class of . On the affine chart of where the corresponding coordinate is nonzero, is given by the ratios ; therefore exactly when every ratio has zero differential, equivalently when the jet of each lies in the line . This says precisely that the image of in is one-dimensional.
Since , the divisor is nonspecial and [F2] gives together with .
By Step 1.1, and ; hence by [F3], and by [F2] applied to the divisor of degree .
Since , theorem [F10] applies over the given arbitrary field and shows that is base-point-free. Thus the complete linear system is defined over .
Let and , where is a uniformizer; choose a local frame of . Since and is one-dimensional over , the exact sequence gives . Hence is two-dimensional, with value and first-order classes represented by and . The kernel of consists of sections whose stalk at lies in ; since has stalk at and agrees with away from , this kernel is exactly . Therefore .
By Step 2.4 the space is base-point-free of dimension , so [F4] provides the morphism of the complete linear system, with ; its target is .
For the arbitrary morphism of Step 1.2, , so its image in is contained in the one-dimensional image of from Step 3.1. It contains the nonzero jet of from Step 2.1, so its image is exactly one-dimensional and Step 2.1 gives .
By [F5] an immersion has injective differential at every point and the tangent space is one-dimensional, so means that is not an immersion at ; Steps 1.2--4.1 apply to every -morphism with and every . Thus no such morphism is a closed or locally closed immersion, and is not closed -very ample relative to .
The morphism of Step 3.2 is one of the morphisms covered by Step 5.1, so at and is not a closed immersion; its differential vanishes at the point of the base-point-free system .
For , [F9] gives (the chosen representative need not equal the zero divisor), hence . Step 2.2 gives , so the complete linear system morphism has target and pulls back to . It is nonconstant because a constant map to a -rational point pulls back to a trivial line bundle, whereas . By [F9], it is finite and , so it is a morphism of degree two. The divisors in the pencil are pullbacks of -rational points of and have degree two; a closed point pulls back to degree by [F9].
In summary has , is base-point-free by Step 2.4, and is not closed -very ample relative to by Step 5.1; since [F6] gives closed -very ampleness for every line bundle of degree at least , the hypothesis cannot be weakened to and the bound is sharp.
Riemann-Hurwitz for a tame double cover with 2r branch points
Example
Let be a field of characteristic not two and let be a finite surjective morphism of degree between smooth proper geometrically integral curves over (Curves over a field) that is tamely ramified with branch locus exactly distinct -rational points of , the ramification index being at each of the points of lying over the branch points. Because the residue characteristic is not two, every residue extension of degree at most two is separable and every ramification index that occurs is invertible, so the tameness hypothesis is automatic here.
The fibre over a branch point is computed by the pullback-degree identity : since and some over has , the branch point carries a single point with and residue degree , so . Over a non-branch point every point is unramified, and with the tame different formula the different divisor is With the complete Riemann-Hurwitz formula (The Riemann-Hurwitz formula with the different) reads , that is .
Such a cover is realized concretely by the smooth projective model of with monic and squarefree of degree over a perfect field of characteristic not two (Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable, Smooth proper curves, dominant morphisms and function fields, Every smooth proper curve admits a projective embedding). Its two affine charts and their overlap are constructed in Verification, step 1.4; this makes the projection and the relative differential module explicit. A point is ramified exactly when vanishes at , in which case , is the residue field of the corresponding root, and . The roots of number counted with their residue degrees, so and again . The infinity chart has two -rational points over , both unramified. When splits over with distinct roots , the branch locus is exactly the distinct -rational points and the model is an example of the abstract cover above.
The small cases confirm the formula: gives , as for , whose smooth projective conic has a rational point and is a projective line by A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line; gives , the genus-one quartic family with ; and gives , as for a squarefree sextic. In general the genus of the model of is .
The proof explicitly assumes the Axiom of Choice. By [F19], it supplies the Dependent Choice required by the Cartier-to-Weil cycle argument in the divisor suppliers; the other Choice-bearing uses are through (Smooth proper curves, dominant morphisms and function fields, Fibres, pullbacks and degrees of divisors under a finite morphism of curves, Local support and index bound for the different of a curve map, Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve, The Riemann-Hurwitz formula with the different, Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Composite of a finite morphism and a proper morphism is proper, Modules over a field are projective, flat, and injective, Every smooth proper curve admits a projective embedding, and A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line. The computations below make no further choice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice; a field of characteristic , an integer , and either (i) a finite surjective degree-two morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves over , tamely ramified with branch locus exactly distinct -rational points and ramification index at each point of over them, or (ii) a perfect such field together with a monic squarefree polynomial of degree , whose model with projection is constructed below.
A nonconstant morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves over has degree , a positive integer; the field extension has degree two in our setting, and every extension of degree at most two in characteristic is separable, since an irreducible quadratic has nonzero derivative when . (Degree of a nonconstant morphism of curves)
For a nonconstant morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves the index-ramification locus is and its image is the index branch locus; is unramified at exactly when ; a nonconstant morphism of smooth proper curves is finite and surjective. (Ramification points, branch points and unramifiedness)
The ramification index at over is for a uniformizer of , and it is independent of the uniformizer. (Ramification index of a morphism of curves)
For a finite surjective morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves with separable function-field extension, the different length satisfies ; moreover if and only if and is separable, and if and only if is separable and is invertible in (tame ramification); in particular consists exactly of the points with or inseparable residue extension. (Local support and index bound for the different of a curve map, Ramification points, branch points and unramifiedness)
The different divisor is the effective divisor on ; its support is the differential-ramification locus. (The different divisor of a generically separable morphism of curves)
For a nonconstant morphism of degree of smooth proper geometrically integral curves, is finite and flat, the pullback of Cartier divisors is defined and additive, for closed points, and for every divisor on ; consequently for every closed point , where is the residue degree. (Fibres, pullbacks and degrees of divisors under a finite morphism of curves, Ramification index of a morphism of curves, Degree divisor proper curve)
For an integral proper curve over , a divisor is a finite integral sum of closed points and . The degree of a principal divisor is zero, so linearly equivalent divisors have equal degree, and the divisor of a rational function on a smooth proper curve has . (Degree divisor proper curve, Principal divisors on a normal proper curve have degree zero)
is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over of genus , with affine coordinate and the point ; every divisor on is linearly equivalent to . (Divisors on the projective line are classified by degree, Genus via the Euler characteristic)
At every closed point of a smooth curve the local ring is a DVR, so the order of a rational function there is defined and additive; the local ring at the generic point is the function field, hence a field, not a DVR. Every invertible sheaf on a smooth proper curve is for a divisor well defined modulo linear equivalence. (Local rings at closed points of smooth curves are discrete valuation rings, Cartier and Weil divisors agree on a smooth curve)
The genus of a smooth proper geometrically integral curve is . (Genus via the Euler characteristic)
Riemann-Hurwitz: for a finite surjective morphism of smooth proper geometrically integral curves with separable function-field extension and different divisor , one has with , equivalently . (The Riemann-Hurwitz formula with the different)
Let be a finitely generated field extension of transcendence degree one in which is relatively algebraically closed and let be perfect. Then there is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over together with a fixed -isomorphism ; any two such identified models are related by a unique -isomorphism inducing the prescribed function-field identification; and for smooth proper geometrically integral curves over the assignment is a bijection from dominant -morphisms onto injective -algebra homomorphisms . (Smooth proper curves, dominant morphisms and function fields)
A curve over is a geometrically integral, separated, finite-type -scheme of chain dimension one; smooth and proper are extra adjectives. (Curves over a field)
For a finitely generated extension , saying that is relatively algebraically closed in means that every element of algebraic over lies in . A perfect field has only separable finite algebraic extensions; for each finite separable extension , is a product of copies of . The extension is flat. (The relative algebraic closure of in an extension , An algebraic closure of a field, Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable, Modules over a field are projective, flat, and injective)
In case (ii), write and put . The two chart rings and are glued on and by and . A morphism is finite when the inverse images of an affine target cover are affine with module-finite coordinate algebras; each displayed monic quadratic quotient is free of rank two over its coordinate polynomial ring. (Finite morphisms of schemes, algebra)
If is squarefree and is invertible, the hypersurface chart is smooth: at any prime either or is a unit. The same criterion applies to when is squarefree. For the finite chart over , the relative differential module is , and for the infinity chart it is . (Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Jacobian presentation of Ω)
A finite morphism to a proper scheme is proper. Every smooth proper geometrically integral curve over admits a closed immersion into some . (Composite of a finite morphism and a proper morphism is proper, Every smooth proper curve admits a projective embedding)
If is a finite-type -domain, then . (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree)
The Axiom of Choice implies Dependent Choice, which is the additional choice assumption carried by the Cartier-to-Weil supplier used in [F9] and by the Cartier-to-Weil arguments in the finite-morphism and projective-line divisor suppliers. (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain)
Under the Axiom of Choice assumed here, if a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over has genus zero and admits a divisor of degree one (equivalently, a -rational closed point), then it is isomorphic to . (A genus-zero curve with a degree-one divisor is the projective line)
Verification
Proof technique: push the degree-two pullback identity through the fibre of each closed point of to pin all ramification indices, then apply the tame different formula and Riemann-Hurwitz; for the concrete model, glue its two standard affine charts and compute their relative differential modules.
For every closed point of and every closed point of with , [F6] gives and , hence with ; consequently , so , , every residue extension is separable by [F1], and all ramification is tame.
In case (ii), has an irreducible factor of multiplicity one. The -adic valuation of in is therefore , so is not a square in and is irreducible over . Thus is a field, finitely generated of transcendence degree one over .
The field is relatively algebraically closed in . Let , so . Over , remains squarefree and has a simple root; its valuation there is odd, so it is not a square in . Hence is a domain. Since is flat, is injective and , where , is a domain. If is algebraic over but not in , then is a finite extension of degree greater than one. Since is perfect, is separable; therefore is a product of copies of , not a domain. Flatness makes , a contradiction. Thus is relatively algebraically closed in .
Construct the model explicitly. Write and define . Glue , , to , , on and by and . The equations agree on this overlap. Each chart is a hypersurface, hence finitely presented over ; the resulting map has inverse images over the standard affine charts, and each chart ring is free of rank two over its base coordinate ring, so is finite of degree two. The polynomial is squarefree: its roots are the reciprocals of the nonzero roots of , and ; there is at least one nonzero root since has distinct roots and at most one is zero. On either chart, at a prime containing (respectively ), the derivative (respectively ) is a unit because the polynomial is squarefree; away from those primes, (respectively ) is a unit. The relative Jacobian criterion therefore makes both charts smooth over . Over , each chart ring is a domain because its squarefree polynomial has a simple root and is not a square in the rational function field. The charts meet in a nonempty open, so their gluing remains integral after base change. Their common function field is , and both chart rings have dimension one by [F18], so this is a curve; it is smooth and geometrically integral. The finite map to the proper curve makes it proper by [F17]. By [F12] it is the smooth proper geometrically integral model of , unique up to the isomorphism compatible with the specified identification of its function field. The projective-embedding result in [F17] makes this model projective. The Given Axiom of Choice supplies Dependent Choice by [F19] for the Cartier-to-Weil divisor suppliers used below.
For every closed point of with , the divisor identity and the additivity and closed-point formula of [F6] give , where is the order of the rational function at ; since is monic of degree , its only pole is at and there , while at a finite point one has if (multiplicity of the irreducible factor, squarefree) and otherwise.
If , Step 1.5 shows that and that has order zero at . Thus lies on the finite chart, where the actual relative-differentials presentation is by [F16]. The element is a unit at , so this localized module is zero; hence and is unramified with separable residue extension, that is by [F4].
In case (i), the branch locus is exactly and every point over has ; by Step 1.1 there is exactly one such , with , so and , while every point over a non-branch point has .
If , then Step 1.5 shows that for an irreducible factor of , with , and . The fibre of the actual finite chart over is , so it has a unique point with residue field . Locally write with a unit. The maximal ideal at that point is and , hence it is ; by [F9], is a uniformizer. Therefore and . The point is tame and has by [F4].
If , then Step 1.5 forces . On the infinity chart the coordinates are and , with . The fibre over is , so it consists of two distinct -rational points. At each, is a unit and [F16] gives locally; each is unramified, hence has . These are the two rational points at infinity.
In case (i), the ramified points are tame with separable residue extension, so [F4] gives , and every unramified point has by the criterion and separable residue; hence with .
Combining Steps 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4, the ramified points of are exactly the points over the closed points for the irreducible factors of , each unique with , , hence and ; every other point is unramified with ; therefore and .
In case (i), has degree and is separable by [F1], so Riemann-Hurwitz applies: , and therefore with as in [F10].
In case (ii) the extension is separable by [F1], so Riemann-Hurwitz gives , that is , with as in [F10]; when splits over with distinct roots the branch locus is exactly those distinct -rational points, so is a cover of case (i) and the two computations agree.
The small cases: for the model of is the smooth plane conic with rational point ; its partial derivatives cannot vanish simultaneously at a projective point. Step 4.2 gives genus zero, and the rational point defines a degree-one divisor, so [F20] gives . The projection identification is explicit: On its inverse is , and on it is ; the formulas agree on the overlap. For and the polynomial is monic squarefree of degree , so the model gives a quartic family of genus . For every squarefree sextic gives a model of genus . Each case is consistent with .
One cocycle carried through the residue realization of Serre duality
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited duality, residue and cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a perfect field, let have coordinate on , fix , and put . Its dual canonical twist is .
For , the local tail in the frame of , is a finite-support principal-part class. For , the section of the dual twist is where . The second expression shows it is regular at infinity and corresponds to under .
The positive residue pairing evaluates at the supported rational point: With rows and columns , this is the diagonal identity matrix. Reversing the section order to makes it anti-diagonal. Since the sections form a basis, this invertible matrix also proves that the classes form a basis. The fixed normalized Serre pairing is its negative, so its matrix has entries ; it is perfect. At its value on and is , which equals in characteristic two.
The Axiom of Choice enters through the cited suppliers; the displayed computations make no additional choices.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, a perfect field , with coordinate , an integer , and .
The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the duality, residue and projective-cohomology suppliers; this computation makes no further selection. (The Axiom of Choice)
The canonical bundle is . Under the standard charts, and the canonical-bundle identification sends to and to . The sheaves are invertible, satisfy , and their frames obey on the overlap. (Canonical bundle and canonical divisors, Twisting sheaf on Proj)
The cohomology of the twists gives the Laurent basis with and , and gives the basis , . (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)
Principal parts compute as finite-support local tails modulo principal parts of global meromorphic sections (including zero); in particular each tail in the frame represents the class . (H^1 of a line bundle on a curve as principal parts modulo meromorphic and regular sections)
At a rational point with parameter , residue is the coefficient of . Over a perfect field, the positive residue pairing is the sum of these local residues. (Residue of a rational differential at a separable closed point, The residue pairing of a line bundle with the dual canonical twist, Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable)
Over a perfect field, the fixed normalized Serre pairing is the negative of the positive residue pairing. (Serre duality for line bundles on a smooth proper curve, and the residue realization, Normalization of the trace for Serre duality on a curve)
For a smooth proper geometrically integral curve, . (h^1 of a line bundle equals the dimension of the space of dual sections)
Verification
Proof technique: represent the tails and global sections in their actual line-bundle frames, evaluate the positive local coefficient, and apply the fixed-trace sign comparison.
By [F2], , and [F3] gives . For each , the tail in the frame has finite support at the rational origin and represents by [F4].
The standard section is on , so under it is represented by . With , and , this becomes , regular for . Thus the form the displayed section basis.
Multiplying the local representative of by cancels the line-bundle frames and gives at the origin. By [F5], its positive residue is when and otherwise, namely . By [F6], the fixed normalized Serre value is .
For ascending section order , the matrix is diagonal; for reversed order it is anti-diagonal. Since the sections form a basis by step 2.1, invertibility of this positive residue matrix proves that the are independent; their number is by step 1.1, so they form a basis. The normalized matrix is its negative and is invertible, so both pairings are perfect.
For , [F7] gives , and step 3.1 gives normalized trace on paired with . In characteristic two this value is .
Sources
- John Tate, Residues of differentials on curves, Ann. Sci. E.N.S. (4) 1 (1968) 149-159
- MIT 18.725 Algebraic Geometry (Fall 2015) course notes, Lectures 24-25
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea (version of October 21, 2025)
- The Stacks Project, Algebraic Curves (tag 0BRV)
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves (Internet Archive copy)
- William Fulton, Algebraic Curves (Internet Archive copy), Ch. 8