Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An oscillatory L1-bounded sequence with unbounded spatial TV

Statement refuted

Assume Countable Choice. The assertion that every sequence (uN)N≥1 in BV((0,1)) with bounded L1(0,1) norms has uniformly bounded total variations is false. For k≥1 let Ik=(2−(k+1),2−k) and define uN:=∑k=1N(−1)kχIk. Then ∥uN∥L1(0,1)=∑k=1N∣Ik∣<1/2, while the adjacent jumps have total magnitude 2N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the interval Ω=(0,1), and the sequence of step functions uN defined above.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used to identify interval Lebesgue integrals with their Riemann values and to use countably additive Lebesgue measure. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Distributional derivatives use the negative-transpose test convention, and BV total variation is the mass of the derivative measure. (Spatial BV and distributional total variation)

[F2]

For BV functions, total variation is the supremum over compactly supported smooth unit-bounded scalar test fields in one dimension; this clause is choice-free. (Test-field formula and L1 lower semicontinuity of spatial TV)

[F3]

Smooth cutoffs supported in small intervals can be chosen equal to one at a prescribed interior point. (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, Lebesgue measure of a bounded interval is its length. (Lebesgue measure is a Radon measure on R^n)

[F5]

A bounded Riemann-integrable function on a compact interval has the same Lebesgue and Riemann integrals. (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral)

Counterexample

Given: The step functions uN and their pointwise limit u on (0,1).

1.1A1F1F4F5F6givenalgebra

The intervals are disjoint and have Lebesgue measure 2−(k+1) by [F4], so ∥uN∥1=∑k=1N2−(k+1)<1/2. Integration by parts on each interval, justified by [F5] and [F6], shows that DuN is an atomic signed measure: its jump at 1/2 has magnitude 1, its N−1 interior jumps at 2−2,…,2−N have magnitude 2, and its jump at 2−(N+1) has magnitude 1. These are all jumps in (0,1), so uN∈BV((0,1)) and TV(uN;(0,1))=1+2(N−1)+1=2N.

2.1A1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1givenconstruct∎

The sequence converges in L1 to u=(−1)k on each Ik and u=0 on (1/2,1), since ∣uN−u∣≤1 and its support lies in (0,2−(N+1)), whose measure tends to zero by [F4]. For each M, choose disjoint small intervals around xj=2−j, 1≤j≤M, avoiding every other dyadic jump, and smooth bumps equal to one at these points, with signs chosen opposite to the jumps of u. Their sum is a compactly supported smooth test function ϕM with ∣ϕM∣≤1. Its support is bounded away from zero, so only finitely many intervals Ik meet it; integration by parts on those intervals, using [F5] and [F6], gives ∫01u ϕM′ dx=1+2(M−1)=2M−1. Thus the test-field supremum for u is infinite. If u were in BV((0,1)), [F2] would make that supremum equal its finite total variation, a contradiction. This proves the refuted assertion fails despite the uniform L1 bound.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources