How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A place permutation is not the nondegenerate Hecke generator at xi=-1
Statement
Let be the trivial -module and let . On , let interchange the two natural factors. On the basis vector , one has . For the nondegenerate type-A Hecke algebra at parameter , its generator must satisfy Consequently the assignment is not a representation of this Hecke algebra. This refutes the naive identification of the degenerate place-permutation generator with the nondegenerate generator at this parameter; it does not rule out other Hecke–KLR or Schur–Weyl maps.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , the trivial -module , with basis , and the place permutation on .
Category O, KLR, and Hecke route conventions: the Category-O tensor-functor generator belongs to the degenerate affine route, while denotes the separate nondegenerate finite-Hecke parameter.
The nondegenerate root-of-unity level-one Hecke regime: the nondegenerate branch has and finite quantum characteristic.
Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras: the nondegenerate quadratic relation is .
Arakawa-Suzuki Casimir operators on tensor functors: is the place-permutation operator in the degenerate tensor action.
The Casimir and place-permutation operators satisfy the degenerate affine Hecke relations: the operators satisfy the degenerate affine Hecke relations on .
The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product: tensor products of basis vectors form a basis of the tensor product, so .
Proof
The place permutation satisfies by [F4], and because tensor products of basis vectors form a basis [F6]; hence .
The parameter has order two in , so [F2] puts it in the nondegenerate finite- branch with . On the nonzero vector , [F4] gives and [F6] gives . The quadratic relation [F3] at is ; assigning would require , hence , a contradiction over . Thus the defining relation fails.
This only refutes the specified assignment: other parameter conversions or homomorphisms remain outside this calculation, and the cited degenerate action [F5] is still valid.
Depends on
- Category O, KLR, and Hecke route conventions
- Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras
- The nondegenerate root-of-unity level-one Hecke regime
- Arakawa-Suzuki Casimir operators on tensor functors
- The Casimir and place-permutation operators satisfy the degenerate affine Hecke relations
- The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, AMS University Lecture Series 15 manuscript, complete 79-page book text (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tomoyuki Arakawa and Takeshi Suzuki, Lie algebras and degenerate affine Hecke algebras of type A, J. Algebra 209 (1998), complete 16-page preprint (standard reference, not scraped)