Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A place permutation is not the nondegenerate Hecke generator at xi=-1

Statement

Let M=C be the trivial gl2(C)-module and let V=C2. On M⊗V⊗2≅V⊗V, let P=P12 interchange the two natural factors. On the basis vector v=e1⊗e1, one has Pv=v. For the nondegenerate type-A Hecke algebra at parameter ξ=−1, its generator T1 must satisfy T12=−2T1−1. Consequently the assignment T1↦P is not a representation of this Hecke algebra. This refutes the naive identification of the degenerate place-permutation generator with the nondegenerate generator at this parameter; it does not rule out other Hecke–KLR or Schur–Weyl maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F=C, ξ=−1, the trivial gl2-module M=C, V=C2 with basis e1,e2, and the place permutation P on M⊗V⊗2≅V⊗V.

[F1]

Category O, KLR, and Hecke route conventions: the Category-O tensor-functor generator belongs to the degenerate affine route, while ξ denotes the separate nondegenerate finite-Hecke parameter.

[F2]

The nondegenerate root-of-unity level-one Hecke regime: the nondegenerate branch has ξ≠1 and finite quantum characteristic.

[F3]

Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras: the nondegenerate quadratic relation is Ti2=(q−1)Ti+q.

[F4]

Arakawa-Suzuki Casimir operators on tensor functors: si=Pi,i+1 is the place-permutation operator in the degenerate tensor action.

[F5]

The Casimir and place-permutation operators satisfy the degenerate affine Hecke relations: the operators si=Pi,i+1 satisfy the degenerate affine Hecke relations on M⊗V⊗d.

[F6]

The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product: tensor products of basis vectors form a basis of the tensor product, so e1⊗e1≠0.

Proof

1.1givenF4F6algebra

The place permutation satisfies P(e1⊗e1)=e1⊗e1=v by [F4], and v≠0 because tensor products of basis vectors form a basis [F6]; hence P2v=v.

1.2givenF2F3F4F6algebra

The parameter ξ=−1≠1 has order two in C, so [F2] puts it in the nondegenerate finite-e branch with e=2. On the nonzero vector v=e1⊗e1, [F4] gives Pv=v and [F6] gives v≠0. The quadratic relation [F3] at q=ξ=−1 is T12=−2T1−1; assigning T1=P would require v=−2v−v=−3v, hence 4v=0, a contradiction over C. Thus the defining relation fails.

2.1givenF1F5algebra∎

This only refutes the specified assignment: other parameter conversions or homomorphisms remain outside this calculation, and the cited degenerate action [F5] is still valid.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources