How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Category O is not semisimple at the rank-one parameter c=1/2
Statement
Let act on by . At and , the polynomial standard module has a nonsplit exact sequence Thus category is not semisimple at this parameter.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rank-one reflection representation, parameter , and the polynomial representation.
Reflection data and parameters for a rational Cherednik algebra: choose and , so and .
The rational Cherednik algebra H_{t,c}(W,h): in this rank-one normalization.
The PBW theorem for rational Cherednik algebras and Standard modules for rational Cherednik category O: the polynomial standard module is as a vector space.
Category O for a rational Cherednik algebra and Standard modules lie in rational Cherednik category O: and its submodules and quotients are objects of .
Proof
Given: [F1]–[F5].
By [F2] and [F5], for every , while . At , this is for even and for odd . In particular, .
The subspace is nonzero and proper. Multiplication by preserves , preserves , and step 1.1 shows for every : for it is zero, while for its polynomial degree is . By [F3], this is the polynomial standard module; [F4] places it and its submodules in .
The quotient is one dimensional; and act by zero and acts trivially, so it is simple. If the displayed exact sequence split, its complement would be a one-dimensional submodule mapping isomorphically to the quotient. A generator would have nonzero constant term; rescale so . Since , there would be a scalar with , or . The polynomial ring is an integral domain and both factors are nonzero, a contradiction. The sequence is nonsplit, so is not semisimple.
Depends on
- Reflection data and parameters for a rational Cherednik algebra
- The rational Cherednik algebra H_{t,c}(W,h)
- The PBW theorem for rational Cherednik algebras
- Category O for a rational Cherednik algebra
- Standard modules for rational Cherednik category O
- Standard modules lie in rational Cherednik category O
- The polynomial representation of a rational Cherednik algebra
- Dunkl operators realize the polynomial standard module
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof and Xiaoguang Ma, Lecture Notes on Cherednik Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victor Ginzburg, Nicolas Guay, Eric Opdam, and Raphael Rouquier, On the category O for rational Cherednik algebras (standard reference, not scraped)