How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The zeros of E4 and E6 at the elliptic points
Statement
has a simple zero at the class of and no other zeros; has a simple zero at the class of and no other zeros. In particular and are nonzero modular forms with , and does not vanish at while does not vanish at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Eisenstein series , with (Eisenstein series are modular forms; their Fourier coefficients, The level-one Eisenstein series E_k and the weight-two series E_2), and the valence formula (The level-one valence formula).
In the valence formula , each summand is either or at least ; the elliptic classes have and , all other classes have (The level-one valence formula, The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers).
Proof
For , and because , so . Every nonzero summand is at least by [F1], with equality exactly for a simple zero at a class with , and the doubles and the integers are all strictly larger than . Hence exactly one summand is nonzero, namely a simple zero at a class with , and the only such class is that of . So vanishes simply at the class of and nowhere else; in particular it does not vanish at .
For , and , so . A nonzero summand at the class of would be at least , leaving a total of at most to be supplied by the remaining summands, of which every nonzero one is at least (at ) or (non-elliptic); this is impossible, so the class of is not a zero. The total must then be a single summand at (any non-elliptic zero contributes at least ), and it equals exactly for a simple zero at . Hence vanishes simply at the class of and nowhere else, in particular not at .
Depends on
Used by
- The dimension of the space of level-one modular forms Corollary
- The modular discriminant and the j-invariant Definition
- The elliptic points of the modular group and their images under j Example
- The square and hexagonal tori have j-invariants 1728 and 0 Example
- The graded ring of level-one modular forms Theorem
- The j-invariant uniformizes X(1) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Modular Functions and Modular Forms (v1.31, 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. Zagier, Elliptic Modular Forms and Their Applications, in The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms (Universitext, Springer, 2008) (standard reference, not scraped)