Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The zeros of E4 and E6 at the elliptic points

Statement

E4 has a simple zero at the class of ω=e2πi/3 and no other zeros; E6 has a simple zero at the class of i and no other zeros. In particular E4 and E6 are nonzero modular forms with E4(∞)=E6(∞)=1, and E4 does not vanish at i while E6 does not vanish at ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Eisenstein series E4∈M4, E6∈M6 with E4(∞)=E6(∞)=1 (Eisenstein series are modular forms; their Fourier coefficients, The level-one Eisenstein series E_k and the weight-two series E_2), and the valence formula (The level-one valence formula).

[F1]

In the valence formula ∑Pord⁡P(f)/νP+ord⁡∞(f)=k/12, each summand ord⁡P(f)/νP is either 0 or at least 1/νP; the elliptic classes have νi=2 and νω=νω+1=3, all other classes have νP=1 (The level-one valence formula, The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers).

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

For E4, k/12=1/3 and ord⁡∞(E4)=0 because E4(∞)=1≠0, so ∑Pord⁡P(E4)/νP=1/3. Every nonzero summand is at least 1/3 by [F1], with equality exactly for a simple zero at a class with νP=3, and the doubles 1/2,2/3,… and the integers 1,2,… are all strictly larger than 1/3. Hence exactly one summand is nonzero, namely a simple zero at a class with νP=3, and the only such class is that of ω. So E4 vanishes simply at the class of ω and nowhere else; in particular it does not vanish at i.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

For E6, k/12=1/2 and ord⁡∞(E6)=0, so ∑Pord⁡P(E6)/νP=1/2. A nonzero summand at the class of ω would be at least 1/3, leaving a total of at most 1/6 to be supplied by the remaining summands, of which every nonzero one is at least 1/2 (at i) or 1 (non-elliptic); this is impossible, so the class of ω is not a zero. The total 1/2 must then be a single summand at i (any non-elliptic zero contributes at least 1), and it equals 1/2 exactly for a simple zero at i. Hence E6 vanishes simply at the class of i and nowhere else, in particular not at ω.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources