How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The level-one valence formula
Statement
Let be even and let with . Then where if is the class of , if is the class of , and otherwise; is the order of vanishing at of the -expansion from The q-expansion principle at the cusp.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An even integer , a nonzero , its -expansion with , holomorphic on and (Level-one modular forms and cusp forms, The q-expansion principle at the cusp); the standard domain with its closure , the elliptic points and stabiliser orders , (The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers).
is holomorphic on ; its zeros are isolated, and the identity theorem forces on every connected open subset (Zeros of a nonzero holomorphic function are isolated, Identity theorem for holomorphic functions). Orders of zeros are defined by The order of a zero of a holomorphic function and the logarithmic derivative has a simple pole of residue at a zero of order (The logarithmic derivative has residue equal to local order, The logarithmic derivative of a meromorphic function, Meromorphic functions on a plane domain).
Argument principle: for a meromorphic admissible on a cycle enclosing a region and nonvanishing on , with the weighted counts of Zero and pole counts weighted by multiplicity and winding number (The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle).
On the truncated fundamental domain the circular arc contributes and the vertical sides cancel, in the sense of The boundary arc contribution in the valence computation; the truncation at height is legitimate because with gives uniformly in as .
Representatives and angles: every class in has a representative in , points of have distinct classes, and the identifications of are only the - and -identifications; at the domain subtends the angle , at each of the angle , and each of the two points is a representative of the single class of (The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers, Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient, The compactified level-one modular curve X(1)).
Proof
Since and has isolated zeros, and since with has no zeros for small , there are finitely many zeros of in for each , and for large all zero classes have a representative there. Choose such a and small, let be the region obtained from by deleting the open discs of radius around each zero of in that set (together with the strip ), and let with the positive orientation. Then is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of and has no zeros on , so by [F2] , and consists of the top horizontal segment, the two vertical sides, the circular arc, cut where zeros occur, and the small circles (or circular arcs) around the zeros.
The top segment is traversed from right to left; on it uniformly in as by [F3], so its contribution to tends to . On the parts of lying on the vertical sides of the integrand is -invariant and the two sides are oppositely oriented, so they cancel exactly; the parts lying on the circular arc contribute in the limit by [F3] (the cuts near zeros are accounted for with the small circles below).
Consider a class with and all its representatives in the truncated domain. Near a zero of order , holomorphic by [F1], so over a circular arc of angle around inside the integral equals as , contributing to (the boundary is traversed clockwise around the deleted disc). By [F4] the total angle of the sectors of at all representatives of is: if is a non-elliptic class (one interior representative, or two boundary representatives each contributing ), for the class of , and for the class of (represented by the two points and ). Hence each class contributes .
Summing 2.1 and 2.2 in the identity of 1.1 and letting , gives , that is . All sums are finite by 1.1, and the term appears as the negative of the top-segment limit.
Depends on
- The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers
- Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient
- Level-one modular forms and cusp forms
- The compactified level-one modular curve X(1)
- Eisenstein series are modular forms; their Fourier coefficients
- The boundary arc contribution in the valence computation
- The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle
- Zero and pole counts weighted by multiplicity and winding number
- The logarithmic derivative has residue equal to local order
- The logarithmic derivative of a meromorphic function
- Zeros of a nonzero holomorphic function are isolated
- The order of a zero of a holomorphic function
- Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
- Meromorphic functions on a plane domain
- The q-expansion principle at the cusp
Used by
- The dimension of the space of level-one modular forms Corollary
- The zeros of E4 and E6 at the elliptic points Corollary
- The modular discriminant and the j-invariant Definition
- The discriminant is a nonvanishing cusp form of weight 12 Lemma
- The graded ring of level-one modular forms Theorem
- The j-invariant classifies complex tori Theorem
- The j-invariant uniformizes X(1) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Modular Functions and Modular Forms (v1.31, 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. Zagier, Elliptic Modular Forms and Their Applications, in The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms (Universitext, Springer, 2008) (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. T. McMullen, Advanced Complex Analysis, Math 213a course notes (Harvard, 2010) (standard reference, not scraped)