Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The level-one valence formula

Statement

Let k be even and let f∈Mk with f≠0. Then ∑P∈PSL2(Z)\H1νPord⁡P(f)  +  ord⁡∞(f)  =  k12, where νP=2 if P is the class of i, νP=3 if P is the class of ω=e2πi/3, and νP=1 otherwise; ord⁡∞(f) is the order of vanishing at q=0 of the q-expansion from The q-expansion principle at the cusp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An even integer k, a nonzero f∈Mk, its q-expansion f(τ)=qng(q) with n=ord⁡∞(f), g holomorphic on ∣q∣<1 and g(0)≠0 (Level-one modular forms and cusp forms, The q-expansion principle at the cusp); the standard domain D with its closure D‾, the elliptic points i,ω,ω+1 and stabiliser orders νi=2, νω=νω+1=3 (The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers).

[F1]

f is holomorphic on H; its zeros are isolated, and the identity theorem forces f≢0 on every connected open subset (Zeros of a nonzero holomorphic function are isolated, Identity theorem for holomorphic functions). Orders of zeros are defined by The order of a zero of a holomorphic function and the logarithmic derivative f′/f has a simple pole of residue m at a zero of order m (The logarithmic derivative has residue equal to local order, The logarithmic derivative of a meromorphic function, Meromorphic functions on a plane domain).

[F2]

Argument principle: for a meromorphic f admissible on a cycle Γ enclosing a region and nonvanishing on Γ, 12πi∫Γf′fdz=Z(f,Γ)−P(f,Γ) with the weighted counts of Zero and pole counts weighted by multiplicity and winding number (The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle).

[F3]

On the truncated fundamental domain the circular arc contributes k/12 and the vertical sides cancel, in the sense of The boundary arc contribution in the valence computation; the truncation at height Y is legitimate because f=qng(q) with g(0)≠0 gives f′/f→2πin uniformly in Re⁡τ as Im⁡τ→∞.

[F4]

Representatives and angles: every class in PSL2(Z)\H has a representative in D‾, points of D have distinct classes, and the identifications of ∂D are only the T- and S-identifications; at i the domain subtends the angle π=2π/νi, at each of ω,ω+1 the angle π/3, and each of the two points is a representative of the single class of ω (The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers, Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient, The compactified level-one modular curve X(1)).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Since f≢0 and f has isolated zeros, and since qng(q) with g(0)≠0 has no zeros for small ∣q∣, there are finitely many zeros of f in D‾∩{Im⁡τ≤Y} for each Y, and for large Y all zero classes have a representative there. Choose such a Y and ε>0 small, let R be the region obtained from D‾∩{Im⁡τ≤Y} by deleting the open discs of radius ε around each zero of f in that set (together with the strip Im⁡τ>Y), and let Γ=∂R with the positive orientation. Then f is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of R‾ and has no zeros on Γ, so by [F2] 12πi∮Γf′fdτ=0, and Γ consists of the top horizontal segment, the two vertical sides, the circular arc, cut where zeros occur, and the small circles (or circular arcs) around the zeros.

2.1F2F3step 1.1givenalgebra

The top segment is traversed from right to left; on it f′/f=2πin+o(1) uniformly in Re⁡τ as Y→∞ by [F3], so its contribution to 12πi∮ tends to −n. On the parts of Γ lying on the vertical sides of ∂D the integrand is T-invariant and the two sides are oppositely oriented, so they cancel exactly; the parts lying on the circular arc contribute k/12 in the limit ε→0 by [F3] (the cuts near zeros are accounted for with the small circles below).

2.2F1F4step 1.1givenalgebra

Consider a class P≠∞ with ord⁡P(f)=m>0 and all its representatives in the truncated domain. Near a zero τ0 of order m, f′/f=m/(τ−τ0)+holomorphic by [F1], so over a circular arc of angle θ around τ0 inside R the integral equals imθ+o(1) as ε→0, contributing −θm/(2π) to 12πi∮Γ (the boundary is traversed clockwise around the deleted disc). By [F4] the total angle of the sectors of R at all representatives of P is: 2π if P is a non-elliptic class (one interior representative, or two boundary representatives each contributing π), π=2π/νi for the class of i, and π/3+π/3=2π/3=2π/νω for the class of ω (represented by the two points ω and ω+1). Hence each class P≠∞ contributes −m/νP=−ord⁡P(f)/νP.

3.1F3step 2.1step 2.2givenalgebra∎

Summing 2.1 and 2.2 in the identity of 1.1 and letting Y→∞, ε→0 gives 0=k12−n−∑P≠∞ord⁡P(f)νP, that is ∑P≠∞1νPord⁡P(f)+ord⁡∞(f)=k12. All sums are finite by 1.1, and the term ord⁡∞(f)=n appears as the negative of the top-segment limit.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources