Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient

Statement

Let Γ≤PSL2(Z) have finite index, with quotient map p:H→Γ\H. (a) For every τ there is an open neighbourhood U of τ such that {γ∈Γ:γU∩U≠∅}=Stab⁡Γ(τ); stabilisers are finite cyclic, distinct orbits have disjoint invariant neighbourhoods, and p is open with Hausdorff quotient. (b) Γ\H carries a Riemann surface structure for which p is holomorphic and which is unique with that property: at a point with trivial stabiliser the local inverse of p is a chart; at an elliptic point, in a local coordinate z centred at it in which a generator of the stabiliser acts by z↦e2πi/νz, the ν-th power zν descends to a chart on the quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-index subgroup Γ≤G:=PSL2(Z) acting on H by biholomorphisms (The modular group and its action on the upper half-plane, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[F1]

Every point of H is G-equivalent to a point of D‾={τ:∣ℜτ∣≤1/2,∣τ∣≥1}, and the only points of D‾ with nontrivial G-stabiliser are i,ω,ω+1, with stabilisers cyclic of orders 2,3,3; G acts faithfully (The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers, The modular group and its action on the upper half-plane).

[F2]

For fixed τ and N>0 only finitely many pairs (c,d)∈Z2 satisfy ∣cτ+d∣≤N (Reduction of orbits to the standard domain).

[F3]

A nonidentity Möbius transformation with two fixed points is conjugate to z↦λz, λ≠0,1 (Nonidentity Möbius transformations are parabolic or conjugate to a dilation, with the projective trace invariant); in a coordinate centred at a fixed point of an element of finite order ν, that element acts as z↦ζz with ζ a primitive ν-th root of unity, and Möbius transformations are biholomorphisms (Biholomorphic maps between complex domains).

[F4]

If f is holomorphic near a with f′(a)≠0, then f is biholomorphic between suitable neighbourhoods of a and f(a) (A nonzero complex derivative gives a local biholomorphism); a nonconstant holomorphic function has the local normal form ϕ(z)m (Local normal form of a nonconstant holomorphic map).

Proof

1.1F1F2F6givenalgebra

For compact sets K,L⊂H, only finitely many γ∈Γ satisfy γK∩L≠∅. Write z∈K, w=γz∈L; if yK≤ℑz≤YK, ℑw≥yL>0 and ∣ℜz∣≤XK, the height formula gives ∣cz+d∣2≤YK/yL. Thus ∣c∣≤YK/yL/yK and ∣d∣≤YK/yL+∣c∣XK, leaving finitely many integer bottom rows. For any fixed bottom row, all determinant-one top rows are (a0,b0)+k(c,d), so the corresponding maps are γ0z+k; the real parts of γ0(K) and L are bounded, leaving finitely many k. Apply this to a closed small disc about τ. The stabiliser is finite cyclic: conjugation into D‾ and [F1, F6] identify it with a subgroup of a cyclic group of order 1,2 or 3. For each of the finitely many non-stabilising maps meeting that disc, disjointness of its image of τ and τ permits shrinking the neighbourhood. Intersect its images under the finite stabiliser to obtain an invariant open U with γU∩U≠∅ exactly for stabiliser elements.

2.1F5step 1.1givenalgebra

If q,q′∈Γ\H are distinct, choose τ,τ′ with p(τ)=q, p(τ′)=q′; the set {γ∈Γ:γB(τ,δ)∩B(τ′,δ)≠∅} is finite for small δ by the same boundedness argument as in 1.1, and no element of it carries τ to τ′ because q≠q′; shrinking δ therefore gives disjoint open neighbourhoods U,U′ of τ,τ′ with γU∩U′=∅ for all γ∈Γ. Then ΓU and ΓU′ are disjoint Γ-invariant open sets, so q,q′ have disjoint neighbourhoods and the quotient is Hausdorff. The map p is open: for open V⊆H, the preimage p−1(p(V))=⋃γ∈ΓγV is open, so p(V) is open by definition of the quotient topology.

3.1F3F4F5step 2.1givenalgebra

Construction of charts. If Stab⁡Γ(τ)={1}, take U as in 1.1; then p∣U is injective, p(U) is open by 2.1, and p∣U−1 is a homeomorphism onto its image by [F5]; declare it a chart, and p is the identity map in these coordinates. If Stab⁡Γ(τ)=⟨γ0⟩ has order ν>1, then ν∈{2,3} by 1.1; by [F3] there is a biholomorphic coordinate z on a disc Δ centred at τ, z(τ)=0, in which γ0 acts by z↦ζz with ζ a primitive ν-th root of unity. Choose Δ so that {γ:γΔ∩Δ≠∅}=⟨γ0⟩; then z1ν=z2ν for z1,z2∈Δ exactly when z2=ζkz1 for some k (both are ν-th roots of the same number), so ψ:=zν induces a bijection Δ/⟨γ0⟩→Δ′ onto a disc Δ′ and this bijection is a homeomorphism by [F5]; since p(Δ)=Δ/⟨γ0⟩, the induced map p(Δ)→Δ′ is a chart on the quotient. In these coordinates p is the holomorphic map z↦zν, so p is holomorphic for the atlas.

4.1F4F5F7step 3.1algebra∎

Transition maps are holomorphic away from elliptic centres by the local inverse theorem [F4]. At a centre of order ν, a quotient-coordinate function pulled back to the uniformising coordinate has a holomorphic Taylor series h(z) invariant under z↦ζz; coefficient comparison gives h(z)=∑m≥0amνzmν=g(zν), with g holomorphic. Indeed its power series converges for ∣zν∣<rν whenever h converges for ∣z∣<r. This proves transition holomorphy also at the centre. Any other surface structure making p holomorphic has the same property for the pullback of each of its charts, so its charts are holomorphic functions of our quotient charts. These functions are injective, since both charts are homeomorphisms; their derivatives are therefore nonzero and their inverses are holomorphic. The two maximal atlases agree, proving uniqueness. The quotient is second countable: images under the open map p of a countable disc basis of H form a basis; it is connected as the continuous image of H. Thus the atlas defines a Riemann surface with all the topological hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources