Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The j-invariant uniformizes X(1)

Statement

The function j descends to a holomorphic map jˉ:X(1)→C^ of compact Riemann surfaces, with jˉ([∞])=∞ and a simple pole at the cusp, and jˉ is a biholomorphism. Consequently X(1) is biholomorphic to the Riemann sphere and j is a Hauptmodul. The quotient map π:H→Y(1)⊂X(1) has local degree 2 at i and 3 at ω and ω+1, representatives of the classes of i and ω; more generally its local degree is 2 throughout PSL2(Z)⋅i, 3 throughout PSL2(Z)⋅ω, and 1 elsewhere. These ramification indices belong to π, while jˉ itself is unramified, so the composed map j=jˉ∘π:H→C^ has local degree 2 at i and 3 at ω and ω+1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact Riemann surface X(1)=PSL2(Z)\H∗ with its cusp [∞], the open part Y(1), and the quotient charts at elliptic points and at the cusp (The compactified level-one modular curve X(1), The cusp chart and compactness of X(1), Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient); the modular function j with j(γτ)=j(τ), holomorphic on H, and with j=q−1+744+O(q) at the cusp (The modular discriminant and the j-invariant).

[F1]

j is injective on PSL2(Z)-classes: if j(τ)=j(τ′) then the lattices Λτ,Λτ′ are homothetic, hence τ′=γτ for some γ∈SL2(Z) and [τ]=[τ′] in Y(1) (The j-invariant classifies complex tori).

[F2]

For λ∈C the form E43−λΔ∈M12 is nonzero with value 1 at the cusp, and its valence sum is 12/12=1>0, so it has a zero in H; hence j takes the value λ (The level-one valence formula, The modular discriminant and the j-invariant, The zeros of E4 and E6 at the elliptic points, The graded ring of level-one modular forms).

[F3]

Local normal form: a nonconstant holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces has, near a point, the form z↦zν in suitable coordinates; an injective holomorphic map of domains has nowhere-vanishing derivative and is biholomorphic onto its image (Local power-map normal form on Riemann surfaces, Ramification index, ramification order and branch value, An injective holomorphic map has no critical point and is biholomorphic onto its image, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains).

[F4]

In the quotient chart of Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient the map π near i is z↦z2 and near ω or ω+1 is z↦z3, these being the local degrees 2 and 3; jˉ will be unramified once it is shown biholomorphic, since biholomorphic maps have local degree one (Ramification index, ramification order and branch value).

Proof

1.1F4givenalgebra

On Y(1) the invariance and holomorphy of j produce a holomorphic function jˉ:Y(1)→C: at ordinary points use a local inverse of π; at a point of stabiliser order ν, the invariant Taylor series in a uniformising coordinate z has only powers zmν, so it is holomorphic in the quotient coordinate zν. Near the cusp, in the q-chart of The cusp chart and compactness of X(1), j is q−1(1+744q+O(q2)), a meromorphic function of q with a simple pole at q=0; since the cusp chart identifies the cusp with q=0, the formula q↦q−1(1+744q+⋯ ) defines a holomorphic map of a punctured disc into C^ extending to 0 with value ∞. Hence jˉ extends to a holomorphic map X(1)→C^ with jˉ([∞])=∞ and a simple pole in the q-coordinate.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra

jˉ is injective. If jˉ([τ])=jˉ([τ′]) then j(τ)=j(τ′) (for τ,τ′∈H) and [F1] gives [τ]=[τ′]; on Y(1) this is the claim, and the cusp is the only remaining point, with jˉ([∞])=∞ not attained on Y(1) because j is holomorphic on H.

3.1F2step 2.1givenalgebra

jˉ is surjective: given λ∈C, [F2] provides τ∈H with j(τ)=λ, so λ is in the image, while ∞=jˉ([∞]); hence jˉ(X(1))=C^.

4.1F3F4step 3.1givenalgebra∎

A bijective holomorphic map of compact Riemann surfaces is a biholomorphism: at every point the local normal form is z↦zν, and injectivity forces ν=1, so the derivative is never zero and the map is locally biholomorphic by [F3]; a locally biholomorphic bijection has holomorphic inverse, so jˉ is biholomorphic and X(1)≅C^ with j a Hauptmodul. The local degrees of π at i and at ω,ω+1 are 2 and 3 by [F4], the same indices hold at all their modular translates because the group acts by biholomorphisms and π∘γ=π; outside these two orbits the stabilisers are trivial and the local degree is 1; since jˉ is unramified, the composition j=jˉ∘π has exactly these local degrees at the corresponding points, in particular 2 at i and 3 at ω and ω+1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources