Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant

Statement

For τ∈H, z∈C and Q=eπiτ, Θ(z∣τ):=∑m∈ZQm2e2πimz=∏n≥1(1−Q2n)(1+Q2n−1e2πiz)(1+Q2n−1e−2πiz). The series and product converge locally uniformly in each variable, uniformly on compact products. For fixed τ, Θ is entire in z with exactly the simple zeros z=(1+τ)/2+a+bτ, a,b∈Z. In particular θ(τ):=Θ(0∣τ)=∏n≥1(1−Q2n)(1+Q2n−1)2≠0. Here Q2=q; these cusp parameters must not be confused.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: τ∈H, z∈C and Q=eπiτ, so ∣Q∣=e−πIm⁡τ<1 (The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors).

[F3]

Normally convergent products of holomorphic functions have holomorphic limits; on a compact set the zeros are exactly those of the finitely many factors that vanish there, and the tail is zero-free (Normally convergent products define holomorphic functions with the expected zeros, Normal convergence of holomorphic products).

[F4]
[F5]

If f is holomorphic near a and vanishes there to order one, then f=(z−a)g with g holomorphic and g(a)≠0 (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).

[F6]

ker⁡exp⁡=2πiZ, exp⁡(w+w′)=exp⁡wexp⁡w′, exp⁡(2w)=exp⁡(w)2, exp⁡w≠0, and ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex for real x,y (ker⁡(exp⁡)=2πiZ, and exp⁡z=exp⁡w exactly when z−w∈2πiZ, exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).

[F7]

exp⁡′=exp⁡, and the chain rule and algebra of derivatives give ddze2πimz=2πim e2πimz (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, The chain rule for complex derivatives, Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).

Proof

1.1F1F2F6F7F8givenalgebra

Let K be a compact subset of the product, so Im⁡τ≥y0>0 and ∣Im⁡z∣≤M on K. Put r:=e−πy0<1. Then ∣Q∣≤r and ∣Qm2e2πimz∣≤rm2e2πM∣m∣ for every (m,z,τ) under consideration; the bounding series converges by [F8], since the ratio of consecutive terms is r2m+1e2πM→0. The M-test [F1] therefore gives uniform convergence on K; each term is entire in z and holomorphic in τ by [F6] and [F7], so [F2] shows that Θ is entire in z for fixed τ, holomorphic in τ, and that the series converges locally uniformly in each variable, uniformly on compact products. Termwise index shifts, licensed by absolute convergence [F8], give Θ(z+1∣τ)=Θ(z∣τ), since e2πim=1, and, using Qm2e2πimτ=Q(m+1)2−1, also Θ(z+τ∣τ)=Q−1e−2πizΘ(z∣τ).

1.2F3F6F7givenalgebra

Put Π(z∣τ):=∏n≥1(1−Q2n)(1+Q2n−1e2πiz)(1+Q2n−1e−2πiz) and gn(z,τ):=(1−Q2n)(1+Q2n−1e2πiz)(1+Q2n−1e−2πiz). For finite grouped products put Π0=1 (the empty product) and ΠN=∏1≤n≤Ngn for N≥1; normal convergence concerns this explicit sequence including its empty prefix. On K as above, with B:=e2πM, the estimate ∣gn−1∣≤(1+r2n)(1+Br2n−1)2−1≤CKr2n−1 shows ∑nsup⁡K∣gn−1∣<∞, so Π is normally convergent and [F3] makes it holomorphic in each variable with the displayed product. The factor 1−Q2n never vanishes because ∣Q2n∣<1. By [F6], 1+Q2n−1e2πiz=0 is equivalent to e2πiz=−Q−(2n−1)=eπi(1−(2n−1)τ), that is to z≡12−2n−12τ(modZ), and likewise 1+Q2n−1e−2πiz=0 is equivalent to z≡−12+2n−12τ(modZ). Writing a solution of the first type as 1+τ2+a+bτ with a=k and b=−n≤−1, and one of the second type with a=k−1 and b=n−1≥0, shows that the union of all solutions over n≥1 is exactly the coset 1+τ2+Z+τZ, each of whose points arises from exactly one n and one factor because the representation a+bτ with a,b∈Z is unique (Im⁡τ>0). At such a solution the derivative of the vanishing factor with respect to z is ±2πiQ2n−1e±2πiz≠0 by [F6] and [F7], so every zero of Π is simple and is a zero of exactly one factor. Finally, cancelling the shifted factors in the normally convergent product, with the reindexings n↦n+1 in the second product and n↦n±1 in the third, gives Π(z+1∣τ)=Π(z∣τ) and Π(z+τ∣τ)=1+Q−1e−2πiz1+Qe2πizΠ(z∣τ)=Q−1e−2πizΠ(z∣τ).

2.1F4F5F6F8step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra

At z0:=1+τ2 we have Θ(z0∣τ)=∑m∈Z(−1)mQm2+m; the terms with indices m and −m−1 are negatives of each other, and the series is absolutely convergent by [F8], so it sums to 0. The shift laws of 1.1 then propagate the vanishing to all points of z0+Z+τZ, the multiplier Q−1e−2πiz being nonzero by [F6]. By 1.2 that coset is exactly the zero set of Π, all its zeros are simple, and Θ is entire in z by 1.1; hence Fτ:=Θ(⋅∣τ)/Π(⋅∣τ) is holomorphic off the coset and, by the Taylor series of its vanishing numerator and the simple-zero factorisation [F5] of its denominator at each zero, extends holomorphically across it to an entire function. The shift laws of 1.1 and 1.2 give Fτ(z+1)=Fτ(z) and Fτ(z+τ)=Fτ(z) off the coset, hence everywhere. Every z∈C is w+m+nτ with m,n∈Z and w in the compact parallelogram {s+tτ:0≤s,t≤1} (take m,n the integer parts of the coefficients of z in the basis 1,τ), so z↦Fτ(z) is bounded on C by its supremum on that compact set; [F4] gives Fτ≡c(τ) for a number c(τ) depending only on τ.

3.1F3F6F8step 2.1givenalgebra

Evaluating the constant of 2.1 at z=14, where no factor of Π vanishes, gives c(τ)=Θ(14∣τ)/Π(14∣τ). The series identity is Θ(14∣τ)=∑mQm2im=∑k(−1)kQ4k2=Θ(12∣4τ): the odd-m terms cancel in the pairs m↔−m, and the even ones m=2k contribute i2kQ4k2=(−1)kQ4k2, all licensed by [F8]. The product identity is Π(14∣τ)=∏n(1−Q2n)(1+Q4n−2)=∏k(1−Q4k)(1−Q8k−4)=∏j(1−Q8j)(1−Q8j−4)2=Π(12∣4τ), obtained from ∏n(1+Q4n−2)=∏n(1−Q8n−4)/∏n(1−Q4n−2) and from splitting ∏k(1−Q4k)=∏j(1−Q8j)∏j(1−Q8j−4); all rearrangements are legitimate by normal convergence [F3]. Hence c(τ)=c(4τ), and iteration gives c(τ)=c(4kτ) for every k≥0. Writing Qk:=Q4k→0, the evaluation of 2.1 at z=12 gives c(4kτ)=Θ(12∣4kτ)/Π(12∣4kτ) with Θ(12∣4kτ)=1+2∑m≥1(−1)mQkm2 and Π(12∣4kτ)=∏n(1−Qk2n)(1−Qk2n−1)2. Since ∣Qk∣→0, ∣Θ(12∣4kτ)−1∣≤2∣Qk∣/(1−∣Qk∣)→0, and with ρ=∣Qk∣, ∣Π(12∣4kτ)−1∣≤exp⁡(ρ(2+ρ)/(1−ρ2))−1→0 by the elementary product bound ∏(1+an)≤exp⁡∑an. Therefore c(τ)=lim⁡kc(4kτ)=1.

4.1F6step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

By 3.1, Θ(z∣τ)=Π(z∣τ) for all z, so by 2.1 the zeros of Θ in z are exactly the simple zeros z=1+τ2+a+bτ, a,b∈Z. Moreover Θ(0∣τ)=Π(0∣τ)=∏n(1−Q2n)(1+Q2n−1)2≠0, since ∣Q2n∣<1 and ∣Q2n−1∣<1 make every factor nonzero. This is the zero-free theta constant θ(τ), and Q2=q by the addition law [F6].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

139 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources