How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transformation laws of the Jacobi theta function
Statement
Assume countable choice. For and , let and be the functions of Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant, and set The principal logarithm is defined here because ; thus is the holomorphic square root of that is positive for , . Then In particular As , uniformly in ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), and .
The theta series converges absolutely and uniformly on compact products; it is entire in and holomorphic in (Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant).
Under countable choice, shifted Poisson summation for a Schwartz function on gives , and both sums converge absolutely. For , , the Fourier transform is (Poisson summation for Schwartz functions, Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
Summable uniform majorants give uniformly convergent function series; locally uniform holomorphic limits are holomorphic, and holomorphic functions on a connected domain agreeing on a set with an interior accumulation point agree everywhere (Weierstrass M-test for complex-valued function series, Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly, Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).
The principal logarithm is holomorphic off the nonpositive real ray and exponentiates to its argument. The exponential is entire, satisfies its addition law and has kernel ; composition preserves holomorphy (The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane, Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers, The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, , and exactly when , The chain rule for complex derivatives).
Proof
For , every derivative of is a polynomial times this Gaussian. Exponential domination (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at ) bounds each such derivative times every power of , so is Schwartz in Schwartz space and its seminorms. Apply [F2] at the real shift to obtain . Multiplying by and expanding gives for every real . This is the asserted inversion identity for , since , and . Countable choice is used precisely through the two suppliers in [F2].
Fix real . Both sides of the claimed inversion identity are holomorphic in . For the right-hand theta series, on any compact its terms have modulus at most , where and bounds ; this summable Gaussian majorant proves holomorphy by [F3]. The other factors are holomorphic by [F4], including , since lies in the right half-plane. The left side is holomorphic by [F1] and composition with . By 1.1 the two sides agree on the positive imaginary axis, whose points accumulate within , so the identity theorem [F3] proves equality for all . Now fix such . The two sides are entire in by [F1, F4] and agree for real , so a second identity-theorem application proves the inversion formula for every .
Each term of the theta series is unchanged on replacing by , since for integral ; absolute convergence therefore proves the stated period-two identity. Setting in 2.1 gives . Since and have the same parity, [F1, F4] give for . Apply 2.1 with and complete the square: . This proves the shifted-constant formula.
Pair with , , in the absolutely convergent shifted series. Its value is . If , then gives . This proves the uniform asymptotic and its stated error term. The principal square root never vanishes on ; no alternative square-root sign, boundary point , or half-weight multiplier convention is implicit in any formula.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant
- Poisson summation for Schwartz functions
- Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization
- Weierstrass M-test for complex-valued function series
- Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly
- Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
- The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane
- Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers
- The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself
- $\exp(z+w)=\exp z\,\exp w$, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
- $\ker(\exp)=2\pi i\mathbb Z$, and $\exp z=\exp w$ exactly when $z-w\in2\pi i\mathbb Z$
- The chain rule for complex derivatives
- Schwartz space and its seminorms
- The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at $+\infty$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
103 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. M. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis (Princeton, 2003) (standard reference, not scraped)