Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transformation laws of the Jacobi theta function

Statement

Assume countable choice. For τ∈H and z∈C, let Θ(z∣τ) and θ(τ)=Θ(0∣τ) be the functions of Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant, and set s(τ)=exp⁡(12Log⁡(τ/i)). The principal logarithm is defined here because Re⁡(τ/i)>0; thus s is the holomorphic square root of τ/i that is positive for τ=it, t>0. Then Θ(z∣−1/τ)=s(τ)eπiτz2Θ(τz∣τ),Θ(z∣τ+2)=Θ(z∣τ). In particular θ(−1/τ)=s(τ)θ(τ),θ(1−1/τ)=s(τ)∑n∈Zeπi(n+1/2)2τ. As Im⁡τ→∞, uniformly in Re⁡τ, θ(1−1/τ)=2s(τ)eπiτ/4(1+O(e−2πIm⁡τ)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), τ∈H and z∈C.

[F1]

The theta series Θ(z∣τ)=∑n∈Zeπin2τ+2πinz converges absolutely and uniformly on compact products; it is entire in z and holomorphic in τ (Jacobi theta triple product and nonvanishing of the theta constant).

[F2]

Under countable choice, shifted Poisson summation for a Schwartz function f on R gives ∑nf(a+n)=∑mf^(m)e2πima, and both sums converge absolutely. For ft(u)=e−πtu2, t>0, the Fourier transform is t−1/2e−πξ2/t (Poisson summation for Schwartz functions, Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).

[F3]

Summable uniform majorants give uniformly convergent function series; locally uniform holomorphic limits are holomorphic, and holomorphic functions on a connected domain agreeing on a set with an interior accumulation point agree everywhere (Weierstrass M-test for complex-valued function series, Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly, Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

For t>0, every derivative of ft(u)=e−πtu2 is a polynomial times this Gaussian. Exponential domination (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞) bounds each such derivative times every power of u, so ft is Schwartz in Schwartz space and its seminorms. Apply [F2] at the real shift a=x to obtain ∑ne−πt(n+x)2=t−1/2∑me−πm2/te2πimx. Multiplying by t and expanding (n+x)2 gives Θ(x∣i/t)=t e−πtx2Θ(itx∣it) for every real x. This is the asserted inversion identity for τ=it, since −1/(it)=i/t, s(it)=t and eπi(it)x2=e−πtx2. Countable choice is used precisely through the two suppliers in [F2].

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Fix real x. Both sides of the claimed inversion identity are holomorphic in τ∈H. For the right-hand theta series, on any compact K⊂H its terms have modulus at most e−πy0n2+C∣n∣, where y0=min⁡KIm⁡τ>0 and C bounds 2π∣xIm⁡τ∣; this summable Gaussian majorant proves holomorphy by [F3]. The other factors are holomorphic by [F4], including s, since τ/i lies in the right half-plane. The left side is holomorphic by [F1] and composition with −1/τ. By 1.1 the two sides agree on the positive imaginary axis, whose points accumulate within H, so the identity theorem [F3] proves equality for all τ. Now fix such τ. The two sides are entire in z by [F1, F4] and agree for real z=x, so a second identity-theorem application proves the inversion formula for every z∈C.

3.1F1F4step 2.1algebra

Each term of the theta series is unchanged on replacing τ by τ+2, since e2πin2=1 for integral n; absolute convergence therefore proves the stated period-two identity. Setting z=0 in 2.1 gives θ(−1/τ)=s(τ)θ(τ). Since n2 and n have the same parity, [F1, F4] give θ(1+u)=Θ(1/2∣u) for u∈H. Apply 2.1 with z=1/2 and complete the square: eπiτ/4Θ(τ/2∣τ)=∑neπi(n+1/2)2τ. This proves the shifted-constant formula.

4.1F1F4step 3.1algebra∎

Pair n=j with n=−j−1, j≥0, in the absolutely convergent shifted series. Its value is 2eπiτ/4(1+∑j≥1eπiτj(j+1)). If y=Im⁡τ, then j(j+1)≥2j gives ∣∑j≥1eπiτj(j+1)∣≤e−2πy/(1−e−2πy). This proves the uniform asymptotic and its stated error term. The principal square root never vanishes on H; no alternative square-root sign, boundary point τ=0, or half-weight multiplier convention is implicit in any formula.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

103 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources