Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Jacobi product formula for the discriminant

Statement

For τ∈H and q=e2πiτ, Δ(τ)=q∏n=1∞(1−qn)24,Δ=(E43−E62)/1728. The product converges locally uniformly for ∣q∣<1; its factor after q is holomorphic and zero-free in the unit disc and equals 1 at q=0. Consequently Δ has integral Fourier coefficients and a simple zero at the cusp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Δ=(E43−E62)/1728∈S12 with q-expansion q−24q2+O(q3), and E2(τ)=1−24∑n≥1σ1(n)qn with its transformation law (The discriminant is a nonvanishing cusp form of weight 12, The level-one Eisenstein series E_k and the weight-two series E_2, The transformation law of the weight-two Eisenstein series E_2).

[F1]

A normally convergent product of holomorphic functions on a domain is holomorphic; on compacta all but finitely many factors are zero-free and the zeros come from the finitely many exceptional factors (Normally convergent products define holomorphic functions with the expected zeros).

[F2]

Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions have locally uniformly convergent derivatives (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly).

[F3]

If a holomorphic function on a domain has zero derivative it is constant (A holomorphic function with zero derivative on a domain is constant).

[F4]

∑r≥0wr=1/(1−w) for ∣w∣<1 and the same geometric identity for complex w follows from the finite geometric sum and ∣w∣N+1→0; absolutely convergent complex double families may be regrouped by applying the real double-series theorem to real and imaginary parts (For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges, Fubini for double series: if ∑i∑j∣aij∣ converges then both iterated sums and the sum along every bijection N→N×N converge to one and the same value); finite products of (1−qn)24 have integer coefficients by the binomial theorem (The binomial theorem over the complex field).

[F6]

F∈S12 means: F holomorphic on H, F(γτ)=(cτ+d)12F(τ) for all γ∈SL2(Z), and the associated function of q is holomorphic at 0 with value 0 (Level-one modular forms and cusp forms).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenalgebra

Put P0(q)=1 for the empty product, PN(q)=∏1≤n≤N(1−qn)24 for N≥1, P(q):=lim⁡NPN(q) and F(τ):=qP(q). For ∣q∣≤r<1 we have ∣(1−qn)24−1∣≤(224−1)rn, a summable majorant independent of q, so the product is normally convergent on the disc and [F1] makes P holomorphic and zero-free there with P(0)=1; hence F is holomorphic and zero-free on H and F(τ)=q+O(q2) (as a function of q). By [F2] the logarithmic derivative of P may be computed from the finite products and the geometric series [F4]: 12πiF′F=1−24∑n≥1nqn1−qn=1−24∑n≥1∑r≥1nqnr=1−24∑m≥1σ1(m)qm=E2(τ), the regrouping being justified by the bound ∑n,rn∣q∣nr≤(1−r)−1∑nnrn<∞ on ∣q∣≤r<1 [F4]; the last series converges by the ratio test.

2.1F3F5F6step 1.1givenalgebra

For γ=(abcd)∈SL2(Z) put Rγ(τ):=F(γτ)/[(cτ+d)12F(τ)]; this is holomorphic and zero-free on H. Its logarithmic derivative, divided by 2πi, equals E2(γτ)(cτ+d)2−12c2πi(cτ+d)−E2(τ) by 1.1, and by the E2 transformation law this is [E2(τ)−6icπ(cτ+d)]−[−6icπ(cτ+d)]−E2(τ)=0 (using 12c2πi(cτ+d)=−6icπ(cτ+d)). Hence Rγ is constant, Cγ, by [F3], and Cγδ=CγCδ because (cγδτ+dγδ)=(cγδτ+dγ)(cδτ+dδ). For T we have F(τ+1)=F(τ), so CT=1; for S we have RS(τ)=F(−1/τ)/[τ12F(τ)] and at τ=i, where −1/i=i and i12=1, this gives CS=F(i)/F(i)=1. Since S,T generate SL2(Z) [F5] and (−I) acts with factor (−1)12=1, multiplicativity gives Cγ=1 for every γ; thus F(γτ)=(cτ+d)12F(τ) for all γ, and since F=q+O(q2) it satisfies the cusp condition. Hence F∈S12 by [F6].

3.1F5step 2.1givenalgebra

By [F5], S12 is one-dimensional and contains the nonzero Δ=q−24q2+O(q3); so F=cΔ for some c∈C. Comparing q-coefficients, 1=c⋅1, so F=Δ, which is the product formula.

4.1F1F2F4step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Integrality of the coefficients: the coefficient of qN in P equals the coefficient of qN in the finite product ∏n≤N(1−qn)24, because all factors with n>N are congruent to 1 modulo qN+1; the finite product has integer coefficients by [F4], and its coefficients agree with those of the analytic expansion of P because the finite products converge locally uniformly, with all derivatives, to P near 0 by [F1] and [F2]. Hence every Taylor coefficient of P is an integer, and the coefficients of Δ=qP are integers as well; the simple zero at the cusp is ord⁡∞(Δ)=1 from the expansion q−24q2+⋯, consistent with [F5].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources