Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The cusp chart and compactness of X(1)

Statement

Let H∗=H∪Q∪{∞} be the space obtained by adding the cusps, topologised by the usual topology on H together with, at γ⋅∞, the images under γ∈PSL2(Z) of the basic neighbourhoods {ℑτ>N}∪{∞} of ∞. Then the PSL2(Z)-action extends continuously to H∗, the cusps form the single orbit Q∪{∞}=PSL2(Z)⋅∞, and X(1)=PSL2(Z)\H∗ is compact Hausdorff with Y(1)=PSL2(Z)\H as a dense open subset whose complement is the single cusp class. The function q(τ)=e2πiτ descends to a homeomorphism of a neighbourhood of the cusp class onto an open disc in C and provides the cusp chart, so that X(1) is a compact Riemann surface.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The action of G:=PSL2(Z)=⟨S,T⟩ on H with Sτ=−1/τ, Tτ=τ+1, its fundamental domain D, and the identification of G with its Möbius transformations on C^ (The modular group and its action on the upper half-plane, The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers).

[F1]

Every orbit meets D‾={τ:∣ℜτ∣≤1/2,∣τ∣≥1}, no two distinct points of D are equivalent, and two distinct z,z′∈D‾ are equivalent exactly when z′=z±1 with ℜz=∓1/2 or z′=−1/z with ∣z∣=1 (The standard fundamental domain, boundary identifications and elliptic stabilisers).

[F2]

For finite-index Γ≤G the quotient Γ\H has the properties of Local charts and the Riemann surface structure of a modular quotient; in particular its quotient map is open and the quotient is Hausdorff.

[F3]

Quotient topologies, continuous maps, homeomorphisms, compactness and Hausdorffness are as in The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection, For a quotient map q:X→Y, a map out of Y is continuous iff its composite with q is; a continuous map on X constant on the fibres of q factors uniquely through q; and a composite of quotient maps is a quotient map, Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological, A continuous bijection is a homeomorphism iff it is open iff it is closed, and homeomorphy is an equivalence relation on spaces, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, For a metric space with its metric topology, compactness in the topological sense is compactness in the metric sense, and the two notions of compact subset coincide, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property; complex structures and holomorphic maps are as in Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases and Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces.

Proof

1.1F2F3givenconstructalgebra

The action extends to H∗: for γ∈G and a cusp γ0⋅∞=m/n with m,n coprime, Bézout gives b,d∈Z with md−nb=1, so (mbnd)∈SL2(Z) and γγ0⋅∞=γ⋅(m/n); Möbius maps are homeomorphisms of C^ carrying Q∪{∞} to itself and the basic cusp neighbourhoods of γ0⋅∞ to basic cusp neighbourhoods of γγ0⋅∞, so the extended action is continuous and well defined. Every rational m/n in lowest terms equals γ⋅∞ for the matrix above with γ=(mbnd), and ∞ itself is in the orbit, so the cusps form the single orbit Q∪{∞}=G⋅∞.

1.2F2F3F4givenconstructalgebra

Fix N>1 and put BN:={ℑτ>N}∪{∞}. If γ∈SL2(Z) has c≠0 and z,γz∈H with ℑz,ℑγz>N, then ℑ(γz)=ℑz/∣cz+d∣2≤ℑz/(cℑz)2=1/(c2ℑz)<1/N<N, a contradiction; hence every γ mapping a point of BN back into BN has c=0, i.e. lies in ⟨T⟩. Consequently the G-orbit of a point of BN meets BN exactly in its ⟨T⟩-orbit, and BN/⟨T⟩ is identified with its image p(BN). By [F4] the map q(τ)=e2πiτ realises H/⟨T⟩≅{0<∣q∣<1}, so it descends to a homeomorphism of p(BN) onto {∣q∣<e−2πN} sending the cusp class to 0; the topology at the cusp was defined exactly so that {ℑτ>N′} corresponds to {∣q∣<e−2πN′}, so this is a homeomorphism onto the open disc and provides the cusp chart.

2.1F1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Put K:=D‾∪{∞} with its subspace topology in H∗. Given an intrinsic open cover U of K, take U∞∈U containing ∞; the subspace topology and the cusp neighbourhood basis give N>1 with K∩BN⊆U∞. The set L:=D‾∩{ℑτ≤N} is closed and bounded in C, with imaginary part at least 3/2, hence compact by Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line and the metric/topological compactness agreement in [F3]. Since H has its usual topology inside H∗, the topology induced on L from K is its usual subspace topology. Thus {U∩L:U∈U} is an intrinsic open cover of L and has a finite subcover. The corresponding finitely many members of U, together with U∞, cover K, proving its compactness. The quotient map p is continuous, so p(D‾∪{∞}) is compact by [F3]; it equals X(1) because every point of H is G-equivalent to a point of D‾ by [F1] and every cusp lies in the orbit of ∞ by 1.1. Hence X(1) is compact.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

To separate the cusp from an interior point p(τ), choose a relatively compact open neighbourhood U of τ with 0<y0≤ℑz≤Y on U. For every γ∈G, its height on U is at most M=max⁡(Y,1/y0): if c=0 height is unchanged, while if c≠0, ℑ(γz)≤1/(c2ℑz)≤1/y0. For N>max⁡(1,M) the open sets p(U) and p(BN) are disjoint. The quotient map on H∗ is open, since the saturation of each open set is the union of its translates; hence these are open neighbourhoods in X(1). Two interior points are separated by [F2], so X(1) is Hausdorff. The interior quotient is open and dense, since every cusp neighbourhood meets H; its complement is the unique cusp class. Its atlas [F2] is compatible with the cusp coordinate: for N>1 stabilisers on BN∩H are trivial and q′=2πiq≠0, so the transition to any local lift chart and its inverse are holomorphic. The inherited countable interior basis plus p(Bn), n≥2, gives second countability; connectedness follows from the connected dense interior. Together with 2.1 this makes X(1) a compact Riemann surface.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

153 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources