Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The q-expansion principle at the cusp

Statement

Let f be holomorphic on H with f(τ+1)=f(τ) for all τ, and put q=e2πiτ. Then there is a unique holomorphic F on the punctured unit disc D∗={0<∣q∣<1} with f(τ)=F(e2πiτ). Moreover f is bounded on {ℑτ>Y0} for some Y0 if and only if F extends holomorphically to q=0, and then F(0)=lim⁡ℑτ→∞f(τ) and f(τ)−F(0)=O(e−2πδℑτ) for some δ>0 as ℑτ→∞. In particular f(τ)=∑n≥0anqn with an=(1/2πi)∮F(q)q−n−1 dq when the extension exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic, 1-periodic f on H and q=e2πiτ; the unit disc and half-plane are those of The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors.

[F1]

∣e2πiτ∣=e−2πℑτ for every τ∈C (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0), and e2πiτ=e2πiτ′ if and only if τ−τ′∈Z (ker⁡(exp⁡)=2πiZ, and exp⁡z=exp⁡w exactly when z−w∈2πiZ).

[F2]

The principal logarithm L=Log⁡ is holomorphic on the slit plane C∖(−∞,0] and satisfies eL(w)=w there (The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane, Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers).

[F4]

On a punctured disc 0<∣z−a∣<R, the singularity a is removable if and only if the function is bounded on some punctured neighbourhood of a; then the extension has value the limit at a (Characterizations of removable singularities).

[F5]

If a holomorphic function vanishes at a, then either it vanishes on a neighbourhood of a, or it has finite order m≥1 and factors locally as (z−a)mg with g holomorphic and g(a)≠0. In either case a function vanishing at 0 is q times a holomorphic function bounded near 0 (take the latter function to be zero in the first case) (The order of a zero is the exponent in its local holomorphic factorization).

[F6]

Every holomorphic function on an annulus has a convergent Laurent series (Laurent expansion on an annulus). The coefficients of a convergent Laurent series are the contour integrals 12πi∮f(ζ)(ζ−a)−n−1dζ, and they are unique (Laurent coefficients are given by contour integrals and are unique).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenconstruct

Let p(τ):=e2πiτ. For every q0∈D∗ there are an open disc V⊆D∗ about q0 and a holomorphic σ:V→H with p(σ(q))=q on V. Indeed, choose an angle α with e−iαq0∉(−∞,0] and let Sα={q:e−iαq∉(−∞,0]}; the function v(q):=L(e−iαq)+iα is holomorphic near q0 by [F2], and ev(q)=e−iαq⋅eiα=q by the addition law. Taking V a small disc contained in D∗∩Sα and setting σ(q):=−iv(q)/(2π) gives e2πiσ(q)=ev(q)=q, and σ is holomorphic by [F3]. Here ℑσ(q)>0 holds automatically: e−2πℑσ(q)=∣e2πiσ(q)∣=∣q∣<1 by [F1], so σ maps V into H.

2.1F1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Define F(q):=f(σ(q)) for a local section σ as in 1.1; this is well defined. If σ,σ′ are two such sections near q, then p(σ(q))=q=p(σ′(q)), so σ(q)−σ′(q)∈Z by [F1], whence f(σ(q))=f(σ′(q)) by the periodicity of f. Since local sections exist near every q∈D∗, this gives a function F on all of D∗, holomorphic because near each point it is the composition f∘σ of holomorphic functions [F3]. If F~ is holomorphic on D∗ with f(τ)=F~(e2πiτ) for all τ, then for q∈D∗ and a local section σ with p(σ(q))=q we get F~(q)=F~(p(σ(q)))=f(σ(q))=F(q); hence F~=F and F is unique.

3.1F1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

If F extends holomorphically to 0, then F is bounded on ∣q∣<δ for some δ>0; for ℑτ>−log⁡δ/(2π) one has ∣q∣<δ by [F1], so ∣f(τ)∣=∣F(q)∣ is bounded on that half-plane. Conversely, if ∣f∣≤M on {ℑτ>Y0}, then for 0<∣q∣<e−2πY0 any local section σ(q) of 1.1 satisfies ℑσ(q)=−log⁡∣q∣/(2π)>Y0 by [F1], so ∣F(q)∣=∣f(σ(q))∣≤M; by [F4] the singularity of F at 0 is removable, F extends holomorphically, and F(0)=lim⁡q→0F(q)=lim⁡ℑτ→∞f(τ) (given ε>0 choose δ with ∣F(q)−F(0)∣<ε for ∣q∣<δ; then ℑτ>−log⁡δ/(2π) gives ∣f(τ)−F(0)∣<ε). Finally, if the extension exists, either F−F(0) vanishes on a neighbourhood of 0, in which case take G:=0, or it vanishes to finite order m≥1 and [F5] writes F(q)−F(0)=qG(q) with G holomorphic near 0; in either case G is bounded near 0, so ∣f(τ)−F(0)∣=∣q∣ ∣G(q)∣≤Ce−2πℑτ for all large ℑτ, which is the asserted O(e−2πδℑτ) with δ=1.

4.1F4F6step 3.1algebra∎

Assume now that F extends holomorphically to 0. On the annulus 0<∣q∣<1 the holomorphic F has Laurent expansion ∑n∈Zanqn, and by [F6] an=12πi∮∣q∣=ρF(q)q−n−1dq for every 0<ρ<1. Since F is holomorphic at 0, all coefficients an with n<0 vanish (their principal part is zero, [F4] applied to the Laurent expansion), so F(q)=∑n≥0anqn and f(τ)=F(e2πiτ)=∑n≥0anqn converges for ∣q∣<1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources