How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuous logarithms and continuous arguments along a contour
Definition
Let be a complex contour (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation) with trace , and let with .
A continuous logarithm of along is a continuous function with
the exponential being that of The complex exponential by its power series. The associated continuous argument of along is (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus).
Let be open with . A holomorphic logarithm branch of on is a holomorphic function (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions) with
Remarks
These are two different objects and only the first is unconditional. A continuous logarithm along is a function of the parameter ; it exists for every complex contour missing , and prescribing the single value among the complex numbers whose exponential is determines it, both by Every contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm, unique up to a constant in ↗. A holomorphic logarithm branch is a function on a plane set, and for a general open missing there need be none.
Along a contour, whose parameter interval is connected, two continuous logarithms differ by one additive constant in . On a general open set , two holomorphic branches differ by a locally constant -valued function, hence by one such constant on each connected component; a single global constant is forced only when is connected. This follows from (, and exactly when ). For and the slit plane, Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers names the principal logarithm; its holomorphy on that domain is proved later on this page.
A continuous argument carries no normalisation of its own: adding to for a fixed integer replaces by , which is again a continuous logarithm. What is unambiguous is the increment , since the two choices differ by the same constant at both endpoints.
Depends on
- Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation
- The complex exponential by its power series
- Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers
- $\ker(\exp)=2\pi i\mathbb Z$, and $\exp z=\exp w$ exactly when $z-w\in2\pi i\mathbb Z$
- Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
- Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions
Used by
- The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by 2π Corollary
- A continuous argument computed along a spiralling contour Example
- The unit circle traversed three times has index 3 at every interior point Example
- A circle traversed k times has winding number k inside and 0 outside Theorem
- Every contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm, unique up to a constant in 2π iℤ Theorem
- The index of a cycle about a point off its trace is an integer Theorem
- The integral of dz/(z-p) along a contour is the increment of a continuous logarithm Theorem
- The winding number of a closed contour is an integer Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Complex Analysis, Ch. 4 §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)