How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finitely patched regular surfaces, their area, scalar integrals, and flux
Definition
A compatible finite patch presentation is a finite list of regular surface patches whose images cover a set , such that for two distinct patches the preimage of their overlap has content zero in each parameter region. For flux, their induced normals must agree at every point of the overlap that is the image of an interior parameter point of both patches. Stating the requirement on the overlap itself is what gives it content: the induced normal of a patch is defined at the images of its interior parameter points, so a requirement imposed only away from the overlap preimages would constrain nothing and would admit opposite normals on patches whose interiors meet along a curve.
For a compatible finite patch presentation, area, scalar surface integrals, and oriented flux are the sums of the corresponding patch values; pairwise overlap preimages have content zero. The presentation is part of the data, so these sums are single-valued without presuming an unproved independence-of-presentation theorem. The content-zero modification result Content-zero parameter-boundary exceptions do not affect surface integrals ensures that seam, pole and endpoint values on a parameter boundary do not affect the individual summands. The content-zero condition on overlap preimages is a separate restriction on the presentation, and what it buys is that no piece of carrying positive area is counted twice; each summand is an integral over the whole of its own parameter region and is unaffected by the overlaps.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- University of Toronto MAT237 notes, Section 5.3, Piecewise Smooth Surfaces (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. E. Taylor, Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables, Section 3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)