Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hochschild hyperhomology of a bounded bimodule complex

Definition

Let k be a field, let A be a unital associative k-algebra, and let F=(Fi,dFi)i∈Z be a bounded cochain complex of k-central A-bimodules with differentials of internal degree zero (Bounded graded bimodule complexes and signed tensor totalization): Fi=0 outside a finite interval of integers, each dFi:Fi→Fi+1 is a map of A-bimodules, dFi+1dFi=0, and each dFi preserves the internal degree when the bimodules carry one (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).

For j≥0 let Cj(A,Fi) denote the Hochschild chains of the coefficient bimodule Fi, that is Cj(A,Fi)=Fi⊗kA⊗kj with C0(A,Fi)=Fi, with the Hochschild boundary bj:Cj(A,Fi)→Cj−1(A,Fi) given by the alternating sum of the faces (Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients); recall C−1(A,Fi)=0 and b0=0. The Hochschild hyperhomology total complex has cochain degree n term Tn(A,F):=⨁i−j=nj≥0Cj(A,Fi), with differential D:Tn(A,F)→Tn+1(A,F) acting on the (i,j) summand as D:=dF+(−1)ib,x⟼dF(x)+(−1)ib(x)∈Cj(A,Fi+1)⊕Cj−1(A,Fi).

Each total degree is a finite direct sum: if F is supported in the interval [a,b], then for fixed n the pair (i,j) satisfies i−j=n and j≥0, hence i=n+j with a≤i≤b and only the finitely many indices i∈[a,b]∩[n,∞) contribute, each by the single summand Ci−n(A,Fi). The differential is well defined and D2=0: a bimodule map commutes with every Hochschild face and therefore with the boundary b, so dFb=bdF, while dF2=0 and b2=0; on the (i,j) summand the coefficient of b in D is (−1)i and the coefficient of b in D on the (i+1,j) summand is (−1)i+1, so the two mixed composites (−1)i+1bdF and (−1)idFb cancel. Thus (T∙(A,F),D) is a cochain complex of k-modules and its cohomology is defined (Cohomology object of a cochain complex): HHhyper,n(A,F):=Hn(T∙(A,F))=ker⁡(D:Tn(A,F)→Tn+1(A,F))im⁡(D:Tn−1(A,F)→Tn(A,F)).

Both structure maps preserve internal degree, so the internal grading descends to T∙(A,F) and to HHhyper,n(A,F). When A and F are internally graded, the ordinary tensor grading on Cj(A,Fi)=Fi⊗kA⊗kj is the sum grading: for homogeneous f∈Fi and a1,…,aj∈A, the tensor f⊗a1⊗⋯⊗aj has internal degree deg⁡int(f)+∑t=1jdeg⁡int(at). If A is concentrated in internal degree zero, this reduces to deg⁡int(f). The maps dF and b are homogeneous of internal degree zero. When A is graded, the Hochschild boundary used here is the ordinary boundary of Hochschild chains and Hochschild homology with coefficients: no Koszul sign is inserted into a face merely because the entries have nonzero internal degree.

For each integer p the subspaces FpTn(A,F):=⨁i≥pi−j=nj≥0Cj(A,Fi) form a decreasing filtration of Tn(A,F) by subcomplexes (each summand of FpT∙ has its D-image again in FpT∙+1, because dF raises i and b fixes i). This filtration is finite at each total degree, exhaustive and separated, since F is bounded. The separate indices i and j therefore enter only through this filtration: the decomposition of Tn(A,F) into its (i,j) summands is not a direct sum decomposition compatible with D, and one may not read HHhyper,n(A,F) off as a direct sum of the homologies of the individual summands Cj(A,Fi). What descends automatically is the internal grading and the total cohomological degree n; the pair (i,j) becomes a filtered piece, exactly as used by the termwise spectral sequence of Termwise Hochschild spectral sequence of a bounded bimodule complex.

Three specializations record the conventions used throughout this page. If F is concentrated in cochain degree 0, then T−j(A,F)=Cj(A,F) for j≥0, with differential b raising the total cochain degree by one; thus HHhyper,−j(A,F)=HHj(A,F), and the hyperhomology vanishes in positive total degrees. If F=0, then T∙(A,F)=0 and all hyperhomology groups vanish. If the differential of F vanishes, then D is, on each fixed-i column, the boundary b up to the sign (−1)i. The total complex is the direct sum of these reindexed Hochschild complexes, so HHhyper,n(A,F)≅⨁i−j=nHHj(A,Fi). This special decomposition does not extend to a general nonzero dF; in that case the (i,j) pieces give the filtration, and the termwise groups Hi(HHj(A,F)) occur on the second page of Termwise Hochschild spectral sequence of a bounded bimodule complex.

This definition is the complex-level Hochschild construction of the source: for a complex of bimodules the Hochschild complex is formed degreewise and then totalized, and the hyperhomology is the homology of that total complex (BPW §3.8.6, printed p.38; Khovanov, printed pp.6–7). No projective resolution is fixed here; the identification of T∙(A,F) with the total complex of the reindexed two-sided bar resolution tensored over Ae with F, and the consequent resolution independence of HHhyper,n(A,F), is the content of Hochschild hyperhomology is independent of a projective resolution.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources