Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The complex of a braid word

Definition

Fix m≥1 and let Ri,Ri−1 be the twist complexes of The twist complexes R_i and R_i^{-1}, built from βi,γi of The Khovanov–Seidel bimodule maps β_i and γ_i and acting on Cm=Kb(proj⁡grAm). Fix a word σ=τ1τ2⋯τk,τℓ∈{σi±1:1≤i≤m}, in the Artin generators and their inverses, and put Rσi:=Ri,Rσi−1:=Ri−1,R1:=Am, the last being the diagonal bimodule Am concentrated in homological degree 0. The complex of the word σ is the iterated signed totalization Rσ:=Rτ1⊗AmRτ2⊗Am⋯⊗AmRτk of Signed totalization of graded A_m-bimodule actions, and Rσ also denotes the endofunctor Rσ ⁣:Cm→Cm,M↦Rσ⊗AmM.

Claims. (i) Rσ is a bounded complex of graded (Am,Am)-bimodules each of whose terms is finitely generated graded projective as a left Am-module and as a right Am-module; (ii) consequently the functor Rσ⊗Am− is an exact additive endofunctor of Cm carrying distinguished triangles to distinguished triangles and agreeing with the derived tensor product through the identity replacements, by Bounded two-sided projective bimodule complexes act on C_m. These two claims are verified below. The definition fixes the complex attached to the chosen word; that different words for the same braid give isomorphic functors is the content of the weak action theorem below and is not asserted here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer m≥1, the algebra Am, the twist complexes Ri,Ri−1 of Cm-bimodules, a word σ=τ1⋯τk in σi±1, and the class P of bounded complexes of graded (Am,Am)-bimodules whose every term is finitely generated graded projective as a left Am-module and as a right Am-module.

[L1]

A graded left Am-module is finite graded projective exactly when it is a degree-zero direct summand of a finite direct sum of internal shifts Am{r1}⊕⋯⊕Am{rn}; the same characterization holds for graded right Am-modules with the shifts acting on the other side; a direct summand of a projective object is projective, and a finite direct sum of finite graded projectives is finite graded projective (Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands, A direct summand of a projective is projective).

[L2]

For an (Am,Am)-bimodule M and an integer r there is a canonical degree-zero isomorphism of graded (Am,Am)-bimodules M⊗AmAm{r}≅M{r} and, symmetrically, Am{r}⊗AmN≅N{r} for a graded left Am-module N, both given on elementary tensors by multiplication (Graded associativity, units, and internal-shift tensor isomorphisms).

[L3]

The signed totalization (R⊗AmS)n=⨁p+q=nRp⊗AmSq of two bounded complexes of graded bimodules is a bounded complex of graded bimodules with d(r⊗s)=dRr⊗s+(−1)pr⊗dSs; the construction is functorial and associative up to canonical degree-zero isomorphism (Signed totalization of graded A_m-bimodule actions).

[L4]

Ri and Ri−1 are bounded complexes of graded (Am,Am)-bimodules with degree-zero differentials, and every term of either is finitely generated graded projective on the left and on the right (The twist complexes R_i and R_i^{-1}).

[L5]

For a bounded complex R of graded (Am,Am)-bimodules whose every term is finitely generated graded projective as a left and as a right Am-module, the functor R⊗Am− is a well-defined additive exact endofunctor of Cm sending distinguished triangles to distinguished triangles, and it agrees with the derived tensor product through the identity replacements (Bounded two-sided projective bimodule complexes act on C_m).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2

Tensor products of two-sided finite graded projectives are again two-sided finite graded projectives. Let M,N be graded (Am,Am)-bimodules finite graded projective on each side. To prove left projectivity, split N as a left module by degree-zero left Am-linear maps i:N→⨁jAm{rj} and p:⨁jAm{rj}→N with pi=1. The maps 1M⊗i and 1M⊗p are well-defined over Am and left Am-linear for the action on M; they exhibit M⊗AmN as a left-module summand of ⨁jM{rj} by [L2]. Thus it is finite graded projective on the left by [L1]. To prove right projectivity, split M as a right module and apply −⊗AmN; the resulting right-linear maps exhibit the tensor product as a summand of finitely many shifts of the right-projective module N. No splitting is assumed bimodule-linear, and each is tensored on its valid balanced side.

2.1step 1.1L3

The totalization of two complexes in P lies in P, and is bounded. Let R,S∈P. Every term of R⊗AmS is a finite direct sum of modules Rp⊗AmSq with p+q=n; each summand is two-sided finite graded projective by step 1.1, and a finite direct sum of such is again such by [L1]. By [L3] the totalization is a complex of graded bimodules, and it is bounded because only finitely many pairs (p,q) with p+q=n occur and R,S each have finitely many nonzero terms.

3.1step 2.1L3L4

The claim for k≤1, and the induction step. For k=0 the complex R1=Am is a single copy of the diagonal bimodule in degree 0, which is finite graded projective on both sides, so R1∈P. For k=1 the factors are Ri or Ri−1, which lie in P by [L4]; and in general, if Rτ1⊗⋯⊗Rτℓ∈P then tensoring with the next factor, which lies in P by [L4], stays in P by step 2.1; hence by induction on k the complex Rσ lies in P for every word. Associativity of the iterated totalization up to canonical isomorphism, which is what makes the notation Rτ1⊗⋯⊗Rτk unambiguous, is part of [L3].

4.1step 3.1L5

The functor properties. By step 3.1 the complex Rσ satisfies the hypothesis of [L5], so Rσ⊗Am− is a well-defined additive endofunctor of Cm, exact for the triangulations and carrying distinguished triangles to distinguished triangles, and it agrees with the derived tensor product through the identity replacements.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Conclusion and scope. The complex Rσ attached to a word σ is a bounded complex of graded (Am,Am)-bimodules with two-sided finite graded projective terms by step 3.1, and its action on Cm is an exact triangulated endofunctor agreeing with derived tensor by step 4.1. The construction depends on the chosen word: nothing here compares Rσ for different words representing the same braid, and no choice principle is used, the tensor products and shifts being explicit and finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources