How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lebesgue inner measure on the real line
Definition
For a set , the Lebesgue inner measure of is
the supremum being taken in .
This is well defined without a measurability assumption on or on its compact subsets: Lebesgue outer measure is defined on every subset of , the family contains , and . Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, compact subsets of are Borel and hence Lebesgue measurable, so and the displayed definition agrees with the usual compact-inner-approximation formula.
Remarks
-
The definition uses compact subsets, not merely closed ones, because compact subsets of always have finite Lebesgue measure.
-
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, for bounded sets For bounded subsets of , Lebesgue measurability is equivalent to equality of inner and outer measure shows that equality is exactly Lebesgue measurability.
Depends on
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- A subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded
- Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Lebesgue measurable
- Assuming countable choice, $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and $\lambda_n$ is a complete measure extending elementary volume
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- FALSE: a dense subset of ℝ of outer measure zero and a dense subset of full inner measure cannot both meet every open interval False statement
- A Bernstein set has inner measure 0, and in every nondegenerate interval its intersection has full outer measure Theorem
- For bounded subsets of ℝ, Lebesgue measurability is equivalent to equality of inner and outer measure Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, An Introduction to Measure Theory (GSM 126), Exercise 1.2.18 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory (UC Davis lecture notes), Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)