How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Left-uniformly continuous bounded functions (UCB)
Definition
Let be the actual bounded complex-valued functions on a locally compact Hausdorff group , with . For set . Define These are actual functions, not chosen representatives of equivalence classes. They are continuous and form a closed translation-invariant subspace of . The left translation action is jointly continuous in the sup-norm topology. For any fixed left Haar measure , the class map embeds isometrically into the complex space. In particular, a UCB function that vanishes -almost everywhere vanishes everywhere.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally compact Hausdorff group with a fixed left Haar measure .
The group operations are continuous, each left translation is a bijection, and is a Borel left-invariant measure (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).
Every nonempty open subset of has positive -measure (Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on compact sets).
consists of Borel measurable complex functions modulo almost-everywhere equality, with the essential-supremum norm (Complex space of a locally compact group).
A continuous complex-valued function on is Borel measurable (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets).
Proof
If , then it is continuous at every . Indeed, for put ; then , so . Here by continuity of inversion.
The zero function belongs to . For and , the estimates and show closure under addition and scalar multiplication. Thus it is a linear subspace of the bounded functions.
Let lie in the norm closure of . For , choose with . Then , since left translation is an isometry for the sup norm. By the defining condition for , a neighborhood of makes the last term . Hence there, so and the subspace is closed.
For , the group law gives . Therefore as , because . So and the subspace is translation-invariant.
Fix . For all and , . The first term tends to zero as and the second as by the defining condition for . This proves joint continuity of the left action.
By [F2], each is Borel measurable and so defines a class in [F1]. Put . If , then some point has , and continuity makes a nonempty open set. It has positive measure by [A2], so . Also because everywhere. Letting when , and noting both norms are zero when , gives . The class map is therefore isometric and injective; in particular, an almost-everywhere zero UCB function is identically zero.
Depends on
Used by
- A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean Lemma
- An invariant mean produces a Reiter net Lemma
- L1 convolution smooths bounded functions into UCB Lemma
- The fixed point property implies amenability Lemma
- Amenability is equivalent to Reiter's condition (P1) Theorem
- Amenability is stable under closed subgroups, quotients and extensions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bachir Bekka, Pierre de la Harpe and Alain Valette, Kazhdan's Property (T) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anne Thomas, The Banach-Tarski Paradox and Amenability, Lecture 20: Invariant Mean implies Reiter's Property (standard reference, not scraped)