Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An invariant mean produces a Reiter net

Statement

Assume AC. Suppose G admits a left-invariant mean on UCB(G); this holds in particular when G is amenable in the sense of Amenable locally compact group. Then G satisfies Reiter's condition (P1) (Reiter's condition (P1)). Consequently every amenable locally compact group satisfies (P1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an LCH group G with fixed left Haar measure μ, and a left-invariant mean on actual bounded uniformly continuous functions UCB(G).

[A1]

AC is assumed in the choice-function form (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

P={f∈L1(G):f≥0, ∥f∥1=1} is convex and LxP=P for every x∈G; (P1) requires a density with the compact-test defect ΔQ(f)≤ε (Reiter's condition (P1)).

[F2]

UCB(G) consists of actual bounded continuous functions, is translation invariant, and its class map into complex L∞(G) is an isometric embedding (Left-uniformly continuous bounded functions (UCB)).

[F3]

Amenability supplies a positive complex-linear unital left-invariant mean on complex L∞(G) (Amenable locally compact group).

[F4]

Under AC, a left-invariant mean on UCB(G) yields a topological invariant mean on L∞(G) (A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean).

[F5]

A topological invariant mean on L∞(G) yields a net (gj)⊆P whose defects ∥h∗gj−gj∥1 tend to zero uniformly for h in every norm-compact subset of P (A topological invariant mean yields norm-approximately invariant densities).

[F6]

For each f∈L1(G), the orbit map x↦Lxf is norm-continuous (Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2).

[F9]

Extended L1 convolution is bilinear and satisfies ∥f∗g∥1≤∥f∥1∥g∥1; it agrees with the compact-support convolution on Cc(G) (Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group).

[F10]

Extended convolution preserves probability densities: f∗g∈P for f,g∈P (A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean, Remark).

[F11]

Under AC, Cc(G) is dense in L1(G) for a Radon Haar measure (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc).

[F12]

Left Haar measure is left invariant and Radon under the repository convention (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).

[F13]

For u,v∈Cc(G), (u∗v)(y)=∫Gu(z)v(z−1y) dμ(z) (Compactly supported convolution on a group).

[F14]

Left translation preserves Cc(G) (Translations preserve compactly supported continuous functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F4

By [F4], the given mean on UCB(G) yields a topological invariant mean m~ on L∞(G).

1.2A1F9F11F12F13F14

We first prove left-equivariance of the extended convolution. For u,v∈Cc(G), [F13] and left invariance give, for every x,y∈G, ((Lxu)∗v)(y)=∫Gu(x−1z)v(z−1y) dμ(z)=∫Gu(w)v(w−1x−1y) dμ(w)=(Lx(u∗v))(y), where z=xw. Thus Lx(u∗v)=(Lxu)∗v in L1(G). For arbitrary f,v∈L1(G) choose un,vn∈Cc(G) with un→f and vn→v in L1, using [F11]. For fixed x, Lxun∈Cc(G) by [F14] and ∥Lxun−Lxf∥1=∥un−f∥1 by [F12]. The convolution bound [F9] then gives un∗vn→f∗v and (Lxun)∗vn→(Lxf)∗v in L1; passing the compact-support identity to these limits proves Lx(f∗v)=(Lxf)∗v.

2.1A1F5step 1.1

Apply [F5] to m~ from step 1.1 and fix the resulting net (gj)⊆P, with defects converging uniformly on norm-compact subsets of P.

3.1A1F1F6F7F8step 2.1construct

Let Q⊆G be compact, ε>0, and put Q0:=Q∪{e}. This is compact: for an ambient open cover of Q0, [F7] supplies finitely many members covering Q, and one additional member covers e; the ambient criterion in [F7] then gives compactness of Q0. The net in step 2.1 shows P is nonempty, so fix f∈P. By [F1], C:={Lxf:x∈Q0}⊆P; by [F6] the orbit map is continuous, and hence C is norm-compact by [F8].

4.1F1F5F10step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

By [F5] applied to the compact set C, choose an index j such that ∥h∗gj−gj∥1<ε/2 for every h∈C. In particular, ∥f∗gj−gj∥1<ε/2, since f=Lef∈C. Let g:=f∗gj∈P by [F10]. For each x∈Q0, step 1.2 gives Lxg=(Lxf)∗gj, so ∥Lxg−g∥1≤∥(Lxf)∗gj−gj∥1+∥f∗gj−gj∥1<ε. Therefore ΔQ(g)≤ε, proving (P1) for arbitrary compact Q and positive ε.

5.1F2F3step 4.1construct∎

If G is amenable, let ν be its mean on L∞(G) from [F3] and define m(ψ):=ν([ψ]) for ψ∈UCB(G). By [F2] this is well-defined, positive, complex-linear and unital; the class map intertwines left translations, so m is left invariant. Applying steps 1.1–4.1 gives (P1).

Sources

BHV, Kazhdan's Property (T), Appendix G.3, Theorem G.3.1 (ii) to (iii), printed p. 455, uses strong continuity to make the translate orbit compact and then applies the uniform approximate-invariance net. Thomas, Lecture 20, slides 17–18 (PDF pp. 17–18), gives the same compact-orbit convolution estimate. Both source proofs take a compact set containing e; the proof above handles arbitrary compact tests by adjoining e.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources