How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An invariant mean produces a Reiter net
Statement
Assume AC. Suppose admits a left-invariant mean on ; this holds in particular when is amenable in the sense of Amenable locally compact group. Then satisfies Reiter's condition (P1) (Reiter's condition (P1)). Consequently every amenable locally compact group satisfies (P1).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an LCH group with fixed left Haar measure , and a left-invariant mean on actual bounded uniformly continuous functions .
AC is assumed in the choice-function form (The Axiom of Choice).
is convex and for every ; (P1) requires a density with the compact-test defect (Reiter's condition (P1)).
consists of actual bounded continuous functions, is translation invariant, and its class map into complex is an isometric embedding (Left-uniformly continuous bounded functions (UCB)).
Amenability supplies a positive complex-linear unital left-invariant mean on complex (Amenable locally compact group).
Under AC, a left-invariant mean on yields a topological invariant mean on (A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean).
A topological invariant mean on yields a net whose defects tend to zero uniformly for in every norm-compact subset of (A topological invariant mean yields norm-approximately invariant densities).
For each , the orbit map is norm-continuous (Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2).
Compactness is intrinsic to the subspace, and every ambient open cover of a compact subspace has a finite subcover (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it).
Extended convolution is bilinear and satisfies ; it agrees with the compact-support convolution on (Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group).
Extended convolution preserves probability densities: for (A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean, Remark).
Under AC, is dense in for a Radon Haar measure (Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc).
Left Haar measure is left invariant and Radon under the repository convention (Left Haar integral and left Haar measure).
Left translation preserves (Translations preserve compactly supported continuous functions).
Proof
By [F4], the given mean on yields a topological invariant mean on .
We first prove left-equivariance of the extended convolution. For , [F13] and left invariance give, for every , , where . Thus in . For arbitrary choose with and in , using [F11]. For fixed , by [F14] and by [F12]. The convolution bound [F9] then gives and in ; passing the compact-support identity to these limits proves .
Apply [F5] to from step 1.1 and fix the resulting net , with defects converging uniformly on norm-compact subsets of .
Let be compact, , and put . This is compact: for an ambient open cover of , [F7] supplies finitely many members covering , and one additional member covers ; the ambient criterion in [F7] then gives compactness of . The net in step 2.1 shows is nonempty, so fix . By [F1], ; by [F6] the orbit map is continuous, and hence is norm-compact by [F8].
By [F5] applied to the compact set , choose an index such that for every . In particular, , since . Let by [F10]. For each , step 1.2 gives , so . Therefore , proving (P1) for arbitrary compact and positive .
If is amenable, let be its mean on from [F3] and define for . By [F2] this is well-defined, positive, complex-linear and unital; the class map intertwines left translations, so is left invariant. Applying steps 1.1–4.1 gives (P1).
Sources
BHV, Kazhdan's Property (T), Appendix G.3, Theorem G.3.1 (ii) to (iii), printed p. 455, uses strong continuity to make the translate orbit compact and then applies the uniform approximate-invariance net. Thomas, Lecture 20, slides 17–18 (PDF pp. 17–18), gives the same compact-orbit convolution estimate. Both source proofs take a compact set containing ; the proof above handles arbitrary compact tests by adjoining .
Depends on
- Reiter's condition (P1)
- A UCB-invariant mean yields a topological invariant mean
- A topological invariant mean yields norm-approximately invariant densities
- Strong continuity of left and modular right translations on L1 and L2
- Convolution on L1 of a locally compact group
- Completeness of the complex Haar L1 and L2 spaces and density of Cc
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- The Axiom of Choice
- Amenable locally compact group
- Left-uniformly continuous bounded functions (UCB)
- Left Haar integral and left Haar measure
- Compactly supported convolution on a group
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism
- Translations preserve compactly supported continuous functions
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bachir Bekka, Pierre de la Harpe and Alain Valette, Kazhdan's Property (T) (Cambridge University Press, 2008; author-hosted complete text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Anne Thomas, The Banach-Tarski Paradox and Amenability, Lecture 20: Invariant Mean implies Reiter's Property (University of Sydney Honours lecture notes, 11 October 2012) (standard reference, not scraped)