Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fixed point property implies amenability

Statement

Assume AC. Let G be a locally compact Hausdorff group with the fixed point property: every continuous affine action of G on a nonempty compact convex subset of a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space has a fixed point. Then G is amenable (Amenable locally compact group).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an LCH group G, and the fixed point property in the Statement.

[A1]

AC is assumed in the choice-function form (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

X:=UCB(G) consists of actual bounded continuous functions with the supremum norm; it is invariant under left translations, and the orbit map x↦Lxψ is norm-continuous for each ψ∈X (Left-uniformly continuous bounded functions (UCB)).

[F3]

The continuous dual X∗ consists of bounded linear functionals with the dual norm; the weak-star topology is the initial topology of the evaluation maps m↦m(ψ) and has a finite-evaluation neighborhood basis (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm, The weak-star topology from finite evaluations).

[F4]

A topological vector space has jointly continuous addition and scalar multiplication; local convexity means that zero has a base of convex neighborhoods (Topological vector spaces over the real and complex fields, Local convexity, convex and balanced sets, and the continuous dual).

[F5]

AC implies that every filter extends to an ultrafilter (The ultrafilter lemma, from the Axiom of Choice: every filter extends to an ultrafilter).

[F6]

Under the ultrafilter lemma, the closed dual unit ball of a normed space is weak-star compact (Banach–Alaoglu).

[F8]

A left-invariant mean on UCB(G) yields Reiter's condition (P1) (An invariant mean produces a Reiter net).

[F9]

Under the ultrafilter lemma, a Reiter net has a weak-star cluster point which is a left-invariant mean on L∞(G) (A Reiter net has an invariant-mean cluster point).

[F10]

Amenability means existence of a left-invariant mean on complex L∞(G) (Amenable locally compact group, Left-invariant means on L∞ of a locally compact group).

[F12]

Reiter's condition (P1) is equivalent to the existence of a net in P with the compact-uniform translation estimates (Reiter's condition (P1)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3F4

Put X:=UCB(G) and E:=X∗ with the weak-star topology. By [F3], every evaluation on E is continuous and linear. Therefore addition and scalar multiplication on E are continuous, since their evaluations are the corresponding sums and scalar multiples. The basic zero-neighborhoods are finite intersections of inverse images of open disks under linear evaluations; these neighborhoods are convex. Distinct functionals differ on some ψ∈X; disjoint scalar neighborhoods of their evaluations pull back to disjoint weak-star neighborhoods, so E is Hausdorff. Hence E is a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space by [F4].

1.2F1F2F3algebra

Let M be the set of positive complex-linear functionals m on X with m(1G)=1. It is nonempty because evaluation δe(ψ)=ψ(e) is a mean, and it is convex. Every real-valued u∈X satisfies m(u)∈R and ∣m(u)∣≤∥u∥∞: positivity applied to ∥u∥∞1G+u and ∥u∥∞1G−u gives both claims. Real and imaginary parts of UCB functions remain in X, since their translation differences are bounded by the original difference. If m(ψ)≠0, set α=m(ψ)‾/∣m(ψ)∣. Then ∣α∣=1 and m(Re⁡(αψ))=∣m(ψ)∣; also Re⁡(αψ)≤∣ψ∣≤∥ψ∥∞1G. Positivity gives ∣m(ψ)∣≤∥ψ∥∞, and the same bound is immediate if m(ψ)=0. Thus M⊆BX∗.

2.1A1F3F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2

The set M is weak-star closed: it is the intersection of {m:m(1G)=1} and, for every nonnegative ψ∈X, {m:m(ψ)∈[0,∞)}; these are closed by [F3]. By [A1] and [F5], the ultrafilter lemma holds, so [F6] makes BX∗ compact. Since M is a closed subset, [F7] makes M compact. Together with step 1.2, M is a nonempty compact convex subset of the locally convex space E.

2.2F1F3step 1.2

For g∈G and m∈M, define (g⋅m)(ψ):=m(Lg−1ψ) for ψ∈X. Translation invariance of X shows this is well-defined; positivity and Lg−11G=1G show g⋅m∈M. The identity LaLb=Lab gives g⋅(h⋅m)=(gh)⋅m, and linearity in m makes each map m↦g⋅m affine.

3.1F1F3step 1.2step 2.2

Fix (g0,m0)∈G×M, ψ∈X, and η>0. By [F1], choose a neighborhood V of g0 with ∥Lg−1ψ−Lg0−1ψ∥∞<η/2 for g∈V. By [F3], choose a weak-star neighborhood W of m0 such that ∣(m−m0)(Lg0−1ψ)∣<η/2 for m∈W. For g∈V and m∈W∩M, step 1.2 gives ∣(g⋅m)(ψ)−(g0⋅m0)(ψ)∣≤∥m∥ ∥Lg−1ψ−Lg0−1ψ∥∞+∣(m−m0)(Lg0−1ψ)∣<η. Thus every evaluation of the action is continuous; by the initial weak-star topology, the action G×M→M is continuous. It is affine by step 2.2.

4.1F1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1given

The fixed point property applied to the continuous affine action of step 2.2 on the nonempty compact convex set M gives a fixed point m∈M. Thus m(Lg−1ψ)=m(ψ) for every g∈G and ψ∈X; as g−1 ranges over G, m is a left-invariant mean on UCB(G).

5.1A1F5F8F9F10F12step 4.1∎

By [F8] and step 4.1, G satisfies (P1); [F12] gives a Reiter net. AC supplies the ultrafilter lemma by [F5], so [F9] gives a left-invariant mean on L∞(G). By [F10], G is amenable.

Sources

BHV, Kazhdan's Property (T), Appendix G.1, Remark G.1.6 and Theorem G.1.7, proves that the fixed-point property for continuous affine actions on nonempty compact convex sets in locally convex spaces implies amenability, using the weak-star compact state space of UCB means and its translation action (printed pp. 448–449). The proof above supplies the compactness and continuity details under the repository's explicit AC convention, then uses the local Reiter and cluster-point suppliers to reach the stated L∞ definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources