How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dual P1 mortar multipliers for boundary contact
Definition
On a contact mesh with nodes and edges of lengths , let be the continuous piecewise-affine scalar trace space with nodal basis . On , write the local endpoint basis as . Define broken piecewise-affine dual functions by and set . The positive discrete multiplier cone is The functions have support on the one or two contact edges incident to and can jump at contact nodes. For and , define the exact mortar coupling The cone is coefficientwise; its elements need not be pointwise nonnegative. Its dual-cone and stability properties are proved in The dual mortar basis is biorthogonal and uniformly stable on the trace space ↗. This is a matching boundary mortar pair and makes no nonmatching-interface claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rolf H. Krause and Barbara I. Wohlmuth, Multigrid Methods for Mortar Finite Elements, complete 7-page paper (standard reference, not scraped)