Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous frictionless elasticity contact is well posed

Statement

Assume the setting of The vector Signorini contact set and variational inequality, including the Axiom of Choice for the trace/Poincare interfaces and Countable Choice. For every bounded linear load F:V→R, there is exactly one u∈K satisfying the contact variational inequality. With α:=2μ/cK2, where cK is from Korn coercivity with a partial Dirichlet segment, solutions for two loads F1,F2 satisfy α∥u1−u2∥V≤∥F1−F2∥V∗.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real Hilbert space V, the nonempty closed convex set K, the bounded load(s), and the elasticity form a in the setting above.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by Stampacchia existence and by the published stability theorem. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[A2]
[F2]

The form is bounded with ∣a(u,v)∣≤M∥u∥V∥v∥V, where M=2μ+2λ. (The isotropic contact elasticity form is well defined and bounded)

[F3]

The form is coercive with a(v,v)≥α∥v∥V2 and α=2μ/cK2>0, because ∥v∥V≤cK∥ε(v)∥2 and a(v,v)≥2μ∥ε(v)∥22. (Korn coercivity with a partial Dirichlet segment, Small-strain elasticity with a frictionless contact gap)

[F4]

On a real Hilbert space, a nonempty closed convex set and a bounded coercive bilinear form yield a unique variational-inequality solution for every bounded linear load. (Stampacchia's variational inequality)

[F5]

For two loads on the same Hilbert space, feasible set, and bounded coercive form, the solutions satisfy α∥u1−u2∥≤∥F1−F2∥V∗. (Lipschitz stability of strongly monotone variational inequalities)

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The contact model with μ>0, λ≥0, the nonempty closed convex set K, and a bounded load F∈V∗.

1.1A1A2F1F2F3F4given

By [F1], V is a real Hilbert space and K is nonempty, closed and convex. The elasticity form is bounded by [F2] and coercive by [F3], with positive constant α=2μ/cK2. Thus every hypothesis of [F4] holds, and [F4] gives exactly one u∈K satisfying a(u,v−u)≥F(v−u) for all v∈K.

2.1A1A2F1F2F3F5step 1.1∎

Apply [F5] to the same V, K and a, with the two bounded loads F1,F2. Its hypotheses are the Hilbert, closed-convex, boundedness, and coercivity properties verified in step 1.1; hence α∥u1−u2∥V≤∥F1−F2∥V∗.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources