How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The local ring of rational functions regular at
Definition
Let be transcendental over (Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups) and let be the localisation of the polynomial ring at the prime ideal (Localisation at a prime ideal: ). By is the ring of rational functions defined at , with maximal ideal generated by and residue field with , the ring is exactly the ring of rational functions regular at , it is a local ring (A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal) with unique maximal ideal , and evaluation at induces an isomorphism . Since is a principal ideal domain (For every field , is a principal ideal domain) with nonzero prime ideal , the ring is a local principal ideal domain with nonzero maximal ideal; by the discrete valuation ring characterisations it is a discrete valuation ring with uniformiser (Equivalent characterizations of a DVR, Discrete valuation rings), and in particular a principal ideal domain (Every DVR is a PID, Principal ideal domain), with field of fractions (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular ).
By Discrete valuation rings a discrete valuation ring is the valuation ring of a discrete valuation on its fraction field. The discrete valuation of with and is the -adic valuation; write it , so that Equivalently, is the vanishing order at . The units of are exactly the fractions with and , and is the maximal ideal, so is a uniformiser of ( is local with unique maximal ideal ).
This ring is the crystal limiting ring of the crystal development below, and it is different from the Laurent ring of The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t: , while ; neither ring contains the other, and both are subrings of . For every free -module the canonical map is an isomorphism, and for every one has ; passing from to is the crystal limit. No freeness of any further module, no lattice and no choice principle is asserted here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The transcendental element over and the ring .
The polynomial ring is a principal ideal domain, and evaluation at , , , has kernel and induces ; hence is a maximal, nonzero ideal and is realised as the fractions with (For every field , is a principal ideal domain, is the ring of rational functions defined at , with maximal ideal generated by and residue field ).
Localising at a prime yields a local ring whose maximal ideal is , whose units are the fractions with ( is local with unique maximal ideal , Localisation at a prime ideal: ).
A nonfield domain is a discrete valuation ring exactly when it is a local principal ideal domain with nonzero maximal ideal (Equivalent characterizations of a DVR).
Every discrete valuation ring is a principal ideal domain, and every discrete valuation ring is the valuation ring of a discrete valuation (Every DVR is a PID, Discrete valuation rings).
For a field , the rational function field equals (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular ).
The Laurent ring is the principal localisation with : every element has a unique finite expansion , and for every unital ring and unit there is a unique unital homomorphism with (The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t).
Verification
Evaluation at has kernel and induces , so is a maximal ideal of and (A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal); in particular is a nonzero prime ideal of the PID .
The field of fractions of is : every polynomial lies in as , so contains by [L3]; conversely and is a field, so .
By [F2] applied to , the localisation is a local ring with maximal ideal , residue field under evaluation : this map is surjective on constants and its kernel consists precisely of fractions with , namely , and units exactly the fractions with , that is, and .
By step 1.1, is a nonzero prime ideal of the principal ideal domain , and by step 2.1 the ring is a local domain with maximal ideal . Every ideal of is generated by its contraction: if with then and , while gives the reverse inclusion, so . The contraction is an ideal of the principal ideal domain , hence principal, so is principal and is a local principal ideal domain with nonzero maximal ideal. By [L1] it is a discrete valuation ring; its maximal ideal is generated by , so is a uniformiser, and by [L2] there is a discrete valuation of with .
Normalisation. Every nonzero can be written uniquely as with and : factor the maximal powers of from the nonzero polynomials and subtract their exponents. For the discrete valuation of step 3.1, units have value zero because both and lie in , so . Surjectivity of onto therefore forces . Set ; this is the vanishing order just computed, with value group and valuation ring .
Uniqueness and units: if is any discrete valuation with and , then . Indeed, for one has exactly when and , that is, exactly when ; for nonzero the element lies in , so , using , additivity and . Thus is the unique such valuation and , with units .
Units and comparisons with : step 2.1 gives the units. For the comparisons, by [L4] with in but , because with would give and hence , a contradiction; and because has value at , while , because the unique homomorphism with of [L4] would send to , forcing the integer , which is impossible.
The crystal limit: let be a free -module with the displayed basis. The residue classes form a -basis of because by step 2.1, and the elements form a -basis of ; the displayed map sends the second basis to the first, so it is an isomorphism. For , multiplication by is a bijection carrying onto , hence induces an -module isomorphism . No choice principle is used: the basis of is given, and all further objects are residue projections of explicitly presented fractional ideals of .
Depends on
- Symmetrizable Cartan data for quantum groups
- Localisation at a prime ideal: $R_{\mathfrak p}=(R\setminus\mathfrak p)^{-1}R$
- A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal
- Principal ideal domain
- Discrete valuation rings
- The Laurent polynomial ring as the principal localisation of Z[t] at t
- $F[x]_{(x)}$ is the ring of rational functions defined at $0$, with maximal ideal generated by $x$ and residue field $F$
- $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is local with unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}$
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a principal ideal domain
- Equivalent characterizations of a DVR
- Every DVR is a PID
- For a field $F$, $F(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(F[t])$ is its rational function field; in particular $\mathbb R(t)=\operatorname{Frac}(\mathbb R[t])$
Used by
- A free A₀-lattice generating the module that is not a crystal lattice Counterexample
- Bar invariance and the congruence modulo q do not imply balancedness Counterexample
- Crystal lattices, crystal bases and their crystals Definition
- The bar lattice and the divided-power integral lattice of a based module Definition
- The Kashiwara lattices L(λ) and L(∞) and their generating sets Definition
- The balanced triple and global basis for the two-dimensional U_q(sl₂)-module Example
- Rank-one tensor strings and their crystal limit rule Lemma
- The crystal basis B(∞) of the negative half Theorem
- The grand loop: existence of the highest weight crystal bases Theorem
- The highest weight and negative half integral crystal triples are balanced Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kyeonghoon Jeong, Seok-Jin Kang and Masaki Kashiwara, Crystal Bases for Quantum Generalized Kac-Moody Algebras, arXiv:math/0305390 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Borcherds, Mark Haiman, Theo Johnson-Freyd, Nicolai Reshetikhin and Vera Serganova, Berkeley Lectures on Lie Groups and Quantum Groups (book-length lecture notes, last updated 18 January 2024) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Masaki Kashiwara, On crystal bases of the q-analogue of universal enveloping algebras, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), no. 2, 465-516 (standard reference, not scraped)