Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ball monomial norms, Bergman and Szegő kernels of the ball

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and let m≥1. For α∈Nm, use ∣α∣:=∑j<mαj, α!:=∏j<mαj!, and zα:=∏j<mzjαj. Write cα:=πmα!(m+∣α∣)! and eα(z):=zαcα. The family (eα)α∈Nm is a complete orthonormal system of A2(Bm). With normalized polar surface measure σ1 on S2m−1=∂Bm, put wα:=(m−1)!α!(m−1+∣α∣)! and eα∂(ζ):=ζαwα. The eα∂ form a complete orthonormal system in the ball Hardy space H2(S2m−1,σ1). The corresponding kernels are KBm(z,w)=m!πm(1−⟨z,w⟩)m+1,SBm(z,w)=1(1−⟨z,w⟩)m. For each α their reproducing identities hold on eα and eα∂, respectively; completeness and bounded evaluation extend these checks to the corresponding spaces.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The only choice assumption is ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)); it is inherited through the Bergman and Hardy Hilbert/Riesz suppliers, and no full Axiom of Choice is used.

[F1]

The ball monomial squared norm is cα=πmα!/(m+∣α∣)!, and the normalized monomials form a complete orthonormal system in A2(Bm) (Weighted monomial integrals and monomial norms for the disc, ball and polydisc, Monomials form complete orthogonal systems of the Bergman spaces of the disc, the ball and the polydisc).

[F2]

The normalized sphere monomials have squared norms wα=(m−1)!α!/(m−1+∣α∣)!; they form a complete orthonormal system in H2(S2m−1,σ1) and evaluations there are bounded (Monomial integrals on the sphere and orthonormality on the distinguished torus, Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space).

[F3]

The ball Bergman and Szegő kernels have the exact displayed formulas and reproduce the corresponding Bergman and Hardy spaces (Bergman kernels of the disc, ball and polydisc, and Szegő kernels of the disc and ball).

[F4]

In a Hilbert space, each vector is the norm limit of the finite-subset Fourier sums for a complete orthonormal family (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space).

[F5]

The Bergman kernel section KΩ(⋅,w) is the unique Riesz representer of evaluation, with f(w)=⟨f,KΩ(⋅,w)⟩ (The Bergman space A2(Ω) and the Bergman kernel).

[F6]

On a Szegő-regular pair, the extended evaluation has a unique Riesz representer Sw, and the Szegő kernel is Sσ(z,w)=Ez(Sw) (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain).

[F7]

The complex L2 pairing is linear in its first variable (The complex L2 pairing on equivalence classes).

[F8]

The complex L2 inner product is conjugate symmetric (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

[F10]

For a multi-index, ∣α∣=∑j<mαj and α!=∏j<mαj! (Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N).

[F11]

Complex natural powers are recursively defined, and zα is the product of the coordinate powers (Integer powers in the complex field, Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F12]

The unit ball Bm is the open ball for the Euclidean norm on Cm (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in Cm, Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary).

Proof

technique · complete monomial systems, the exact model kernels, and finite Fourier sums

Given: ACω, m≥1, Bm, its sphere, and normalized polar surface measure.

1.1A1F1F10F11given

By [F10] and [F11], the multi-index factorials, lengths and powers in the formulas have their stated meanings. The ball moment in [F1] gives ∥zα∥A2(Bm)2=cα, and [F1] gives completeness of the normalized monomials.

1.2A1F2given

By [F2], ∥ζα∥L2(S,σ1)2=wα and the normalized boundary monomials form a complete orthonormal system of the Hardy space; their evaluations are bounded.

1.3A1F3F9F12given

By [F12], z,w∈Bm have Euclidean norms below 1; Cauchy–Schwarz [F9] gives ∣⟨z,w⟩∣≤∥z∥∥w∥<1, so both denominators are nonzero. The model-domain theorem [F3], with Lebesgue measure and normalized polar boundary measure, gives the displayed closed-form kernels.

1.4A1F1F4F5F7F8F9

Fix w∈Bm and let Kw=KBm(⋅,w). By [F4], its Fourier sums over finite F⊂Nm converge in A2(Bm) to Kw. For each β, [F5] gives ⟨eβ,Kw⟩=eβ(w), so conjugate symmetry [F8] makes its Fourier coefficient ⟨Kw,eβ⟩=eβ(w)‾. If F contains α, orthonormality gives ⟨eα,∑β∈Feβ(w)‾eβ⟩=∑β∈Feβ(w)⟨eα,eβ⟩=eα(w). Passing to the norm limit using [F9] proves ∫Bmeα(z)KBm(z,w)‾ dλ(z)=eα(w).

1.5A1F2F4F6F7F8F9

Fix w∈Bm and let Sw be the Riesz representer of the bounded Hardy evaluation at w. By [F4], its finite-subset Fourier sums in the complete system eβ∂ converge to Sw. By [F6], ⟨eβ∂,Sw⟩=eβ∂(w), so conjugate symmetry [F8] gives Fourier coefficient ⟨Sw,eβ∂⟩=eβ∂(w)‾. For a finite F containing α, orthonormality gives ⟨eα∂,∑β∈Feβ∂(w)‾eβ∂⟩=eα∂(w). Passing to the norm limit using [F9] proves ⟨eα∂,Sw⟩=eα∂(w), the Hardy reproducing identity for that basis vector. This uses the boundary Hilbert-space representer Sw; the interior kernel is not evaluated at a boundary point.

2.1A1F1F2F3F5F6F9step 1.4step 1.5∎

The finite linear spans of the complete systems in [F1] and [F2] are dense in their respective Hilbert spaces. Bounded evaluation from [F5] and [F2], and continuity of inner products from [F9], extend the identities of steps 1.4 and 1.5 from monomials to the full Bergman and Hardy spaces. At α=0, c0=πm/m! and w0=1; setting z=0 in the kernels gives m!/πm and 1. When m=1, B1=D and the formulas specialize to the disc kernels.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

169 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources