Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bergman kernels of the disc, ball and polydisc, and Szegő kernels of the disc and ball

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), let m≥1, and use Lebesgue measure on Cm≅R2m with the first-variable-linear pairing. Write ⟨z,w⟩:=∑j<mzjwj‾ for the standard Hermitian inner product. Then

KD(z,w)=1π(1−zw‾)2,KDm(z,w)=1πm∏j<m1(1−zjwj‾)2,KBm(z,w)=m!πm(1−⟨z,w⟩)m+1.

Let μT be normalized Haar measure on T=∂D, and let σm be normalized polar surface measure on S2m−1=∂Bm. The pairs (D,μT) and (Bm,σm) are Szegő-regular, with kernels

SD(z,w)=11−zw‾,SBm(z,w)=1(1−⟨z,w⟩)m.

Each displayed Bergman kernel reproduces the corresponding A2 space and is the unique such kernel. Each displayed Szegő kernel reproduces the corresponding boundary Hardy space and is its unique Riesz kernel. No smooth-boundary Szegő construction is asserted for the polydisc.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The only choice axiom assumed is ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). It supplies the Bergman and Hardy Hilbert/Riesz constructions and the Hilbert Fourier expansion used below; no full Axiom of Choice is used.

[F1]

The normalized monomials form complete orthonormal systems in A2(D), A2(Bm), and A2(Dm), with squared norms π/(k+1), πmα!/(m+∣α∣)!, and πm/∏j<m(αj+1), respectively (Monomials form complete orthogonal systems of the Bergman spaces of the disc, the ball and the polydisc).

[F2]

For a complete orthonormal system (eα) of a Bergman space, its kernel is ∑αeα(z)eα(w)‾; the sum converges absolutely and uniformly on compact subsets (A2(Ω) is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).

[F3]

The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series is absolutely convergent, with sum the product of the sums (The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series converges absolutely to the product of their sums).

[F4]

For a real r with 0≤r<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r) (For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges).

[F5]

Conjugation is multiplicative, ∣xy∣=∣x∣∣y∣, ∣1∣=1, and ∣t∣=0 exactly when t=0 (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

[F6]

Complex series are limits of their finite partial sums, and absolute convergence is defined by the real modulus series (Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence, Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series). An absolutely convergent complex series converges (Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum).

[F9]

The Euclidean norm on Cm is ∥z∥=(∑j<m∣zj∣2)1/2, and its balls are the stated unit balls (Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary, Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in Cm).

[F10]

The complex multinomial expansion holds for every m,n∈N (The multinomial theorem for finitely many complex variables).

[F11]

For every α∈W(n,m), ιC((nα))∏i<mιC(αi!)=ιC(n!) (The multinomial theorem for finitely many complex variables).

[F12]

The disc Hardy pair is Szegő-regular and has kernel 1/(1−zw‾) under normalized Haar measure (The disc trace space is the Hardy boundary space and the Szegő family reproduces H2).

[F13]

The ball Hardy pair is Szegő-regular; extended evaluation is bounded and has a unique Riesz representer (Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space).

[F14]

The normalized ball boundary monomials form a complete orthonormal system with squared norms wα=(m−1)!α!/(m−1+∣α∣)! (Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space).

[F15]

A complete orthonormal family has a norm-convergent Fourier expansion by the net of finite-subset sums (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space).

[F18]

On a Szegő-regular pair, each extended evaluation has a unique Riesz representer and the Szegő kernel is defined from those representers (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain).

[F19]

The Bergman kernel reproduces evaluation on A2(Ω) (Reproducing property, Bergman projection and the extremal characterization).

[F20]

Each point evaluation on A2(Ω) has a unique Riesz representer, whose holomorphic representative defines the Bergman kernel (The Bergman space A2(Ω) and the Bergman kernel).

[F23]

Induction on the natural numbers is valid (The principle of mathematical induction).

[F24]

Natural powers are recursively defined; (ab)k=akbk, and conjugation of a natural power is the corresponding power of the conjugate (Integer powers in the complex field, Laws of integer exponents, with the last identity following by induction from the recursion and [F5]).

Proof

technique · direct, using complete monomial systems and the binomial series

Given: ACω, the unit disc, unit ball and unit polydisc, and the normalized boundary measures.

1.1F5F8F9given

The series parameters lie in the unit disc. If z,w∈D, or if z,w∈Dm, then ∣zw‾∣<1 or ∣zjwj‾∣<1 coordinatewise. If z,w∈Bm, [F8] gives ∣⟨z,w⟩∣≤∥z∥∥w∥<1 by [F9]. Thus every denominator below is nonzero.

1.2A1F12F18

The disc pair with normalized Haar measure is Szegő-regular and has kernel 1/(1−zw‾) by [F12]. The Szegő definition [F18] makes each kernel section the unique Riesz representer of its extended evaluation, so this is the unique disc Szegő kernel.

2.1F4F5F6F7F21F24step 1.1given

Fix a complex t with ∣t∣<1. By induction from the power recursion [F24] and modulus multiplicativity [F5], ∣tk∣=∣t∣k for every k. The real geometric series for ∣t∣ converges by [F4], so ∑k≥0tk is absolutely convergent and converges by [F6], say to G(t). The finite identity (1−t)∑k=0Ntk=1−tN+1 follows by telescoping in the field [F21]; [F7] gives ∣t∣N+1→0, hence tN+1→0. Since ∣t∣<1=∣1∣, t≠1; taking limits gives G(t)=1/(1−t).

3.1F3F16F21F23step 2.1given

For every integer q≥1, define Bq(t):=∑k≥0(q+k−1q−1)tk. Step 2.1 is the base q=1. If Bq(t) is absolutely convergent with sum (1−t)−q, its Cauchy product with ∑j≥0tj is absolutely convergent and has sum (1−t)−(q+1) by [F3]. The coefficient of tk in this product is ∑j=0k(q+j−1q−1). Set i=q+j−1; the hockey-stick identity [F16] sums (iq−1) from i=0 to q+k−1, and [F16] makes each omitted term with i<q−1 zero. Thus the coefficient is (q+kq). By [F21] this natural identity also holds for the coefficients embedded in C. Thus the product is exactly Bq+1(t), proving the identity for every q≥1 by induction [F23].

4.1A1F1F2F3F6F22F23F24step 3.1

On the disc, the normalized monomials from [F1] give KD(z,w)=π−1∑k≥0(k+1)(zw‾)k=π−1B2(zw‾), which is the stated formula by step 3.1. On the polydisc, [F2] gives the monomial expansion. Its finite degree shells are cofinal among finite subsets by [F22], so the shell sums have the same limit as the kernel expansion. Repeated Cauchy products [F3] show that the degree-k shell sum is the degree-k coefficient in the product of the m absolutely convergent series π−1B2(zjwj‾); hence summing the shells gives their product.

4.2A1F1F2F10F11F17F21F22F24step 3.1

For z,w∈Bm, put t=⟨z,w⟩. The Bergman expansion [F2] and ball monomial norms [F1] give KBm(z,w)=π−m∑α∈Nm(m+∣α∣)!α!zαwα‾. The degree shells are finite and cofinal by [F22], so their partial sums converge to this kernel. In the shell ∣α∣=k, the multinomial expansion [F10] applied to xj=zjwj‾ gives ∑∣α∣=kιC((kα))zαwα‾=tk, using [F24] for powers and conjugation. Also [F11] gives ιC((kα))∏j<mιC(αj!)=ιC(k!), while [F17] gives ιC((m+km))ιC(m!)ιC(k!)=ιC((m+k)!) after [F21] identifies the real and complex canonical naturals. The factorial denominator is positive by [F17, F21], so division gives (m+k)!/α!=m!(m+km)(kα) in the corresponding real scalars. The degree-k block is therefore m!πm(m+km)tk. Step 3.1 sums these blocks to the stated formula.

4.3A1F10F11F13F14F15F17F18F21F22F24step 3.1

Let Sw be the ball Szegő Riesz representer from [F13], and let eα(ζ)=ζα/wα be its complete orthonormal boundary monomials by [F14]. By [F15], Sw=∑α⟨Sw,eα⟩eα. For any finite subset of indices, the first-variable-linear reproducing identity gives ⟨eα,Sw⟩=eα(w) and hence ⟨Sw,eα⟩=eα(w)‾. The finite degree shells are cofinal by [F22]; applying the bounded evaluation at z from [F13] to the Fourier sums over those shells gives SBm(z,w)=∑k≥0∑∣α∣=kzαwα‾/wα. For each shell, [F10] applied to xj=zjwj‾ gives ∑∣α∣=kιC((kα))zαwα‾=⟨z,w⟩k, using [F24] for powers and conjugation. Since wα=(m−1)!α!/(m−1+k)!, [F11] gives ιC((kα))∏j<mιC(αj!)=ιC(k!), and [F17] gives ιC((m+k−1m−1))ιC((m−1)!)ιC(k!)=ιC((m−1+k)!) after [F21] identifies canonical natural scalars. The factorial denominator is positive by [F17, F21], so division gives the degree-k block (m+k−1m−1)⟨z,w⟩k. Step 3.1 with q=m sums these blocks to (1−⟨z,w⟩)−m. The Szegő definition [F18] gives uniqueness of this Riesz kernel.

5.1F2F19F20step 1.2step 4.1step 4.2step 4.3∎

The basis expansions in steps 4.1 and 4.2 are the Bergman Riesz kernels by [F2], so [F19] supplies their reproducing identities; uniqueness follows from the Bergman-space Riesz definition [F20]. Steps 1.2 and 4.3 establish the two Szegő reproducing kernels and uniqueness. Setting either kernel variable to 0 in the displayed formulas (equivalently, retaining only the degree-zero monomial term) gives KD(0,w)=1/π, KDm(0,w)=1/πm, KBm(0,w)=m!/πm, and both stated Szegő values 1. When m=1, B1=D and D1=D, and the corresponding formulas agree. The polydisc appears only in the Bergman product formula, so no boundary regularity is claimed for it.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

222 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources