How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bergman and Szegő Kernels
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analytic Hardy Spaces and Canonical Factorisation
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Conformal Mapping, Branches, and the Schwarz Lemma
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Convexity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Domains of Holomorphy, Plurisubharmonicity and Pseudoconvexity
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Harmonic Functions and the Poisson Integral
- Harmonic Hardy Classes and Fatou Boundary Limits
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Heat Equation Maximum Principles Duhamel and Smoothing
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Holomorphic Functions of Several Complex Variables
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Infinite Products and the Weierstrass Factorisation Theorem
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Isolated Singularities and Laurent Series
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Stone–Weierstrass in General
- Strongly Continuous Semigroups and Hille Yosida
- Subharmonic Functions and the Dirichlet Problem
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Trigonometric and Oscillatory Examples in One Variable
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page develops Bergman spaces, their reproducing kernels and invariant metrics, together with the surface-measure Hardy and Szegő construction on regular smooth domains.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain
Facts & Assumptions
Under The Axiom of Countable Choice (), complex with the pairing is a Hilbert space, with the pairing linear in its first variable and conjugate symmetric (The complex pairing on equivalence classes, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
Under The Axiom of Countable Choice (), every closed linear subspace of a Hilbert space has an orthogonal projection, determined by the unique orthogonal decomposition (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace).
Under The Axiom of Countable Choice (), every bounded linear functional on a Hilbert space has a unique Riesz representer, with in the first-variable-linear convention (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be a nonempty bounded connected open set with boundary (Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals), let be its boundary surface measure (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces), and fix a normalization with . Give the first-variable-linear pairing from The complex pairing on equivalence classes. For , its boundary trace is an class because is compact and is finite. Set
The space is linear, and is a closed linear subspace of the Hilbert space by [F1]. The Szegő projection is the orthogonal projection
which exists by [F2].
Call Szegő-regular if, for every , the rule is well-defined and bounded on in the norm, and its unique continuous extension has the property that is holomorphic on for every . Boundedness and density make each unique. By [F3], there is a unique such that
For a Szegő-regular pair define its Szegő kernel by . Then is the reproducing identity, , and conjugate symmetry of the inner product gives . The regularity condition makes the kernel holomorphic in ; conjugate symmetry makes it antiholomorphic in . The assumption is used through the Hilbert-space, projection and Riesz suppliers in [F1]–[F3]; no stronger choice principle is asserted. No Szegő construction is claimed for boundaries that are not hypersurfaces, including the polydisc when .
Proof
Given: , the bounded domain , the finite measure , and the spaces and just defined.
The space is linear, so its closure is a closed linear subspace of . By [F1] the ambient space is a Hilbert space with the stated pairing; therefore the closed subspace is itself a Hilbert space.
The orthogonal-decomposition theorem in [F2] gives each a unique component, and The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace defines to be that component.
For a Szegő-regular pair each is a bounded linear functional on the Hilbert space from step 1.1, so [F3] gives its unique representing vector and the stated reproducing identity.
The definition gives ; conjugate symmetry of the pairing in [F1] gives . The regularity condition makes holomorphic, and this symmetry makes antiholomorphic.
The mean-value bound for holomorphic functions on a polydisc
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Countable Choice is the principle defined by The Axiom of Countable Choice (). It is the only choice assumption below; the polar-measure and product-Lebesgue suppliers used here state it explicitly.
If is holomorphic on and , then (A holomorphic function equals its average on every circle inside a larger concentric holomorphy disc).
The chart surface measure of agrees with its polar surface measure; under the angular chart its density is , so (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
For every nonnegative Borel on , polar coordinates give (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Lebesgue measure is translation invariant on measurable sets (Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).
Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of nonnegative simple functions, and increasing limits pass through the Lebesgue integral; thus the setwise translation invariance in [F4] extends from indicators and simple functions to nonnegative Borel integrals (Every nonnegative measurable function admits an explicit increasing sequence of simple approximations, Monotone convergence for the integral).
Borel sets in a finite Euclidean product are product-measurable; Tonelli permits iterated integration of nonnegative product-measurable functions, and the finite product of planar Lebesgue measures agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure under (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}).
A holomorphic function is continuous, hence is Borel (A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic); the one-variable case is also supplied by Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there.
Restricting the complex linear derivative in the definition of holomorphy to a coordinate line shows that every coordinate slice of a holomorphic function is holomorphic (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of ).
A polydisc is the product of its coordinate discs, and is identified with with the corresponding Lebesgue convention (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in , Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary).
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be open, let , and let be a polyradius with each such that . If is holomorphic on , then
where is Lebesgue measure under . In particular, for a common radius the coefficient is .
Proof
Given: , , the open set , the point , the positive polyradius , and the holomorphic function from the statement.
For a one-variable holomorphic on and each , [F1] gives the circular mean of as . Expanding the nonnegative integral of and using that mean identity yields .
By [F2], the angular measure in step 1.1 is the polar surface measure with total mass . The function for and otherwise is nonnegative Borel by [F7]. Apply [F3] to , using translation invariance [F4]–[F5]. Integrating the circle inequality in step 1.1 against for gives ; the same polar formula applied to the indicator of the disc gives .
Let . By [F6] and [F9], the measure of their product is the product of their planar measures, so step 2.1 gives .
For , let be the integral of over with product planar measure, with . For each fixed tuple of the first coordinates, [F8] shows that the resulting one-variable slice is holomorphic on . The estimate of step 2.1 applies to that slice; integrating over the preceding discs and using [F6] gives . Iterating for and using [F6], [F7] and [F9] to identify with the integral in the statement gives . Step 3.1 identifies the coefficient with , completing the proof.
The complex Hessian of a function dominates that of a minorant at a common minimum
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , an open set , real-valued functions , a point , a neighbourhood of on which , and .
The identification of with transports open sets and real coordinate regularity, and means all ordered real coordinate derivatives through order two exist and are continuous (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).
For a real function on a real open set, its real Hessian quadratic form is nonpositive at an interior local maximum (The Hessian is negative semidefinite at an interior local maximum).
The Wirtinger operators are and (Wirtinger operators in ).
If a map has continuous coordinate partial derivatives on a neighbourhood, it is totally differentiable there, and the ordinary chain rule for total derivatives applies (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The chain rule for total derivatives: ). Applied to an affine complex line and to the first coordinate derivatives of a real function, it gives the line-composition derivative formulas used below.
The real coordinate mixed partial derivatives of a function commute (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
The Levi form is , with the one-based indices of The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity.
Statement
Let , let be open, let , and let . If on a neighbourhood of and , then for every
Here is interpreted in the real coordinates of Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, and the one-based complex-coordinate aliases and Wirtinger derivatives are those of The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity.
Proof
Given: as in the statement and an arbitrary .
Put . If , both sides of the claimed inequality are zero. Otherwise, since is open, the affine map maps a sufficiently small disc about into . On a possibly smaller such disc, is real by [F4], is nonnegative, and satisfies ; hence is a local minimum of .
The function is real and has a local maximum at . Apply [F2] in the real coordinates . Its Hessian quadratic form is nonpositive on each coordinate vector, so and . Therefore .
Write . By the definitions in [F3] and the chain rule in [F4], and therefore . Also, the one-variable Wirtinger formulas give by [F5]. Thus [F6] and step 2.1 imply , which is the required inequality for this arbitrary .
Weighted monomial integrals and monomial norms for the disc, ball and polydisc
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the Axiom of Countable Choice , and a multi-index . Write , , and using the conventions of maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space and Integer powers in the complex field.
For , and , write .
The only choice principle assumed is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is required by the polar-coordinate, chart/polar surface, sigma-finiteness and product-Lebesgue suppliers below; no full Axiom of Choice or arbitrary-index selection is used.
The complex-real identification and Euclidean norm are those of Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, and the open unit ball and open unit polydisc are those of Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in .
For every nonnegative Borel function on , polar coordinates give (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
On each angular chart of , the derivative has norm , so the surface density is ; summing a partition of unity over one full turn gives chart surface measure . The chart surface measure equals the polar measure (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
For , the Euler Beta integral is and converges (Euler's real Beta integral, Euler's Beta integral converges exactly for two positive parameters); change of variables is valid on the improper interval after compact truncation (Change of variable in an improper integral).
The Beta-Gamma identity is , and for every (The real Beta--Gamma identity, for every natural number , The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
Nonnegative product-measurable functions satisfy Tonelli's iterated-integral identity on sigma-finite measure spaces; under , product Lebesgue measure agrees with Euclidean Lebesgue measure on Borel sets, and equality of these measures gives equality of nonnegative integrals by simple approximation and monotone convergence (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure, Every nonnegative measurable function admits an explicit increasing sequence of simple approximations, Monotone convergence for the integral).
In real coordinates the displayed integrands are nonnegative polynomials times indicators of open balls or polydiscs. Finite sums and products of coordinate polynomials are continuous by the algebra theorem; the preimage criterion makes continuous maps Borel measurable, and products of measurable functions remain measurable ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, A measurable function between measurable spaces, A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined, Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ).
A nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ).
Induction on the positive integer dimension is valid (The principle of mathematical induction).
Multi-indices, their factorials and lengths, and complex nonnegative integer powers have the conventions used in the statement ( maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in , Integer powers in the complex field).
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , and let be Lebesgue measure under . For every and every integer ,
In particular,
For the unit polydisc and the one-dimensional disc,
and for every integer ,
Proof
Given: , , and ; the indices in use the zero-based convention in [F1] and [F9].
For integers and , let . The integrand extended by zero outside the disc is nonnegative Borel by [F7]. By [F2] and [F3], .
The substitution is increasing from onto and has . Thus [F4] gives .
By [F5], . Hence .
In dimension , writing and taking in step 3.1 gives , the asserted formula.
Fix and assume the ball formula in dimension for all multi-indices and nonnegative integer weights. Write and slice at ; its last-coordinate slice is , where by [F8]. For the slice is empty. By Tonelli, product-Lebesgue agreement, and step 3.1, .
The unit polydisc is the product of unit discs and . Repeated application of Tonelli and product-Lebesgue agreement, followed by step 3.1 with and in each coordinate, gives .
Substitution of the induction hypothesis into step 4.2 gives , since and . The base case step 4.1 and this induction step prove the weighted ball formula in every positive dimension by [F10].
Setting in the ball formula gives its unweighted monomial integral; setting also gives . Setting in step 4.3 gives , and the case , , in the ball formula gives the stated disc integral.
Sup-norm and first-derivative bounds by the norm on compact subsets
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the Axiom of Countable Choice , an open set , a nonempty compact set , and a holomorphic function .
The only choice principle is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is used through the local mean-value lemma and the complex Hilbert-space supplier; no full Axiom of Choice or sequence-selection principle is used.
Read as with its Euclidean metric and norm (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary).
Open and closed polydiscs and balls have the coordinatewise definitions of Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in .
For a holomorphic on an open set containing a closed polydisc , the local mean-value lemma gives (The mean-value bound for holomorphic functions on a polydisc).
If is holomorphic on , , and , then (Cauchy estimates for mixed derivatives on a polydisc).
Holomorphic functions on open subsets of are continuous (Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic).
Multi-index notation and use the convention of maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space.
Under , complex with its quotient norm is a Hilbert space, so the norm satisfies the triangle inequality and convergence implies the Cauchy property ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions).
If are measurable, then (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
In a metric space, distance to a nonempty set is -Lipschitz and hence continuous by the - definition (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric, , so the distance to a fixed nonempty set is -Lipschitz, Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the - form).
In a metric space, openness gives a ball about each point (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).
A compact subset is compact in its subspace metric, and a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space attains its minimum (A subset of a metric space is open in the subspace metric exactly when it is the trace of an open set of the ambient space, and it is compact as a metric space in its own right exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
Every Euclidean closed ball of positive radius in is compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
A Cauchy sequence in converges (The complex plane is complete, and convergence is equivalent to convergence of real and imaginary parts).
A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic with locally uniform convergence of every complex derivative (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, with locally uniform convergence of all derivatives).
For nonnegative measurable functions, Fatou's lemma gives (Fatou's lemma).
Sums and scalar multiples of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be open, and let be nonempty and compact. There are finite constants and for every multi-index with such that every holomorphic satisfies
Moreover, if a sequence of holomorphic functions converges in to an equivalence class , then has a holomorphic representative and , uniformly on for every .
Proof
Given: as in the statement.
If , set . Otherwise put . By [F9] this is continuous, and for each openness gives an with , so . The minimum is positive by [F11]; set . In either case, for every . Let .
For the closed polydisc is contained in , since each coordinate difference is at most and . If , each coordinate of a point in differs from by at most as well, so . Thus these closed polydiscs lie in . For each such , the local mean bound [F3], monotonicity [F8], and the norm definition in [F7] give , so .
Since is holomorphic on and , apply [F4] with outer polyradius and inner polyradius . For every this gives . This includes , where by [F6].
Taking and in step 3.1 proves both compact estimates.
Now let converge in to . By [F7] it is Cauchy in that norm. For every nonempty compact , applying the first estimate of step 4.1 to the holomorphic difference (holomorphic by [F16]) shows that is uniformly Cauchy on . Every point of has an open ball neighborhood contained in by [F10]; its concentric closed ball of half the radius is compact by [F12]. Completeness of in [F13] therefore gives a pointwise limit on , and letting in the uniform Cauchy bound shows uniformly on every compact subset of .
The convergence in step 5.1 is locally uniform, so [F14] implies that is holomorphic and that locally uniformly for every multi-index . In particular this convergence is uniform on the compact set for .
To identify the limit, fix and choose so that whenever , using convergence to and [F7]. For fixed , pointwise; the functions are measurable since and the holomorphic are continuous by [F5]. Fatou's lemma [F15] applied to gives . Thus , and the vector-space property in [F7] gives ; the same estimate for all proves in . Uniqueness of limits in the norm metric gives .
The disc trace space is the Hardy boundary space and the Szegő family reproduces
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle is the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). The Hardy boundary theorem, Hardy-space and torus conventions, Hilbert structure, and Riesz/Szegő construction below are used under this hypothesis; no full Axiom of Choice or arbitrary-index selection is used.
The unit circle is parametrized by , normalized Haar measure is , and (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).
is defined by the supremum of the radial means; in particular is a normed complex vector space and (Analytic Hardy spaces on the unit disc, Radial p-means of a holomorphic function are nondecreasing).
For , the Fatou boundary theorem gives , as , and (Fatou's boundary theorem for analytic Hardy spaces).
For , its boundary function satisfies the Cauchy representation (Cauchy representation of an function from its boundary values).
with is a complex Hilbert space, the pairing is linear in its first variable, and it satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
The Hardy boundary space in the Szegő definition is the closure of traces from (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain).
Every bounded linear functional on a complex Hilbert space has a unique representing vector with under the first-variable-linear convention (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
A function on an open subset of is holomorphic when it is complex differentiable at each point (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).
Complex differentiability implies continuity (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).
Conjugation is involutive and , so ; modulus is multiplicative and subadditive, hence the reverse triangle inequality follows (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
The metric on is the Euclidean metric on , so is a compact Euclidean closed ball (The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane, For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains its maximum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).
A rational function is holomorphic wherever its denominator is nonzero (Complex polynomials are entire with the power-rule derivative, and rational functions are holomorphic wherever their denominator is nonzero).
Every Cauchy sequence in converges (The complex plane is complete, and convergence is equivalent to convergence of real and imaginary parts).
A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions is holomorphic (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, with locally uniform convergence of all derivatives).
For nonnegative measurable functions, (Fatou's lemma).
Szegő regularity means that trace evaluation is well defined and bounded on the generating trace space, and its continuous extension is holomorphic in the interior variable (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain).
For a Szegő-regular pair, the Szegő kernel is defined by , where is the Riesz representer of (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain, Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be the unit disc and let be normalized Haar measure on . Write for the boundary space in The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain, with its first-variable-linear pairing.
-
The traces of functions holomorphic on a neighbourhood of are dense in , and the boundary-value range is closed in . The map is an isometric isomorphism .
-
For every , the evaluation is bounded on , and the function belongs to . For all , Consequently is Szegő-regular and its two-variable Szegő kernel is .
Proof
Given: , , normalized Haar measure , and the analytic and boundary Hardy spaces just defined.
For every , [F3] gives and ; boundary limits are linear, so is a linear isometry. If , then by [F2] and [F4] gives for every , proving injectivity.
Fix and . The dilate is holomorphic on : for there, its difference quotient tends to by [F8]. It is continuous on a neighbourhood of by [F9], and its boundary trace is . By [F3], these traces converge to in as , so the neighbourhood-holomorphic traces are dense in the boundary-value range.
Let , the generating class in [F6]. By [F11] and [F12], is bounded on , hence every radial mean of is bounded and by [F2]. Continuity on makes its radial boundary limit equal to at every point, so [F3] identifies its trace with in . Thus every generating trace in [F6] belongs to the boundary-value range.
Let be a sequence in the boundary-value range converging in to . The preimage is unique by step 1.1, so this sequence is well defined; [F3] applied to differences shows is Cauchy in . For fixed , [F4] applies to . With , [F1] and [F10] give and . Cauchy–Schwarz in [F5] therefore yields
By [F14], has a limit for each . Given , choose with ; the estimate of step 2.1, uniformly for , makes uniformly Cauchy on that neighbourhood. Hence locally uniformly, and [F15] makes holomorphic.
The Cauchy sequence is bounded in . For every , pointwise convergence on and [F16] give so . Given , choose with for . For fixed and each , another application of [F16] as gives . Taking the supremum over proves in .
By [F3] applied to , its boundary traces converge in to . Since as well and limits are unique, . This proves that the boundary-value range is closed.
The neighbourhood-holomorphic traces in step 1.2 lie in the generating trace space of [F6], and step 1.3 shows every generator lies in the boundary-value range. Step 1.2 gives density of the smaller trace space in that range, and step 5.1 proves the range is closed. Therefore the closure defining equals the boundary-value range; step 1.1 makes an isometric isomorphism onto it.
Fix . If , ; if , choose , so and for , hence by [F10]. Thus is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of by [F13]. Step 1.3 identifies its trace with in the boundary-value range, and step 6.1 puts it in the boundary space. For , [F1] and [F10] give , so , hence . For , [F4] gives ; [F5] and [F3] then give the stated bounded-evaluation estimate and reproducing identity.
For every generating trace from [F6], step 1.3 gives and , so step 7.1 shows . Thus trace evaluation is well defined and bounded on the generating space, and is its continuous extension to the closure, as required by [F17]. By step 6.1 every in that closure is for a unique ; step 7.1 gives , which is holomorphic in . In particular , so . The boundary range is closed by step 5.1 in the Hilbert space [F5], hence it is a Hilbert space; [F7] and [F18] identify as the unique representer used in the kernel definition. Therefore proving Szegő regularity and the claimed normalization.
Monomial integrals on the sphere and orthonormality on the distinguished torus
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle assumed is the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is carried through the polar-coordinate, polar-surface, previous ball-integral, normalized-torus and linear-change-of-variables suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice or arbitrary-index selection is used.
Under , the unit ball and the unit sphere are the Euclidean ball and sphere for the norm (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ).
For a nonnegative Borel function on , polar coordinates give (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
The polar surface measure is for Borel ; the polar-coordinate theorem makes it a finite Borel measure (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
For , the preceding ball-integral lemma proves that is nonnegative Borel and gives (Weighted monomial integrals and monomial norms for the disc, ball and polydisc).
is the product of the normalized Haar probabilities on the circle and has total mass one (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).
Multi-indices have , , and ; complex powers are defined recursively for natural exponents ( maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, Integer powers in the complex field).
For real , and ; for , by induction from the exponential addition law (, , and , , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, The principle of mathematical induction, Integer powers in the complex field).
Complex multiplication is commutative, conjugation is multiplicative, , and ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Multiplication of one complex coordinate by acts on its real coordinate pair by , whose determinant is (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus).
An invertible real linear map sends Lebesgue measure to (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not).
A measurable measure-preserving self-map preserves integrals of integrable complex functions (Measure-preserving transformations and systems, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).
In real coordinates, each is a finite polynomial, hence continuous and Borel; on the unit sphere and distinguished torus its modulus is at most one ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition, Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable, A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Integer powers in the complex field).
Translation of any one coordinate preserves the product normalized Haar measure on (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).
The pointwise product of measurable functions is measurable (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined).
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be the polar surface measure on , and set . For all multi-indices ,
where if and otherwise. On the distinguished torus with product normalized Haar measure ,
Proof
Given: , , the polar surface measure , and .
Apply [F2] to the indicator of the open, hence Borel, unit ball. For every lies in , while for none does, so By [F4], , which is finite and positive, so is well defined.
Fix and a unit complex number with , and let multiply the th complex coordinate by and fix the others. It maps the unit sphere to itself; its real matrix is the identity except for the th block in [F9], whose determinant is . Since and its inverse are continuous, both and are Borel for Borel by [F12]. The conical set in [F3] is carried onto the cone for , so [F10] gives ; applying this equality to gives . Thus the continuous map is measure preserving, and [F11] makes the integrals of the bounded monomial products in [F12] invariant.
For a fixed , set . The integrand is nonnegative Borel by [F12] and [F14]; since , [F2] and [F4] give Hence , and division by the total mass in step 1.1 gives the normalized diagonal moment.
Suppose and choose with . Let and , so [F7] gives and . By the recursive powers in [F6], induction and commutativity give : if , factor ; if , factor . Under the integrand is multiplied by this scalar. Integral invariance from step 1.2 therefore makes its integral equal to its negative, so it is zero. The integrand is integrable by [F12] and finiteness in step 1.1.
On , the normalized product Haar measure is invariant under translation of any one coordinate by [F13]. For , choose as in step 2.2 and translate that coordinate by the torus element represented by , which multiplies it by . The integrand is multiplied by by the same power calculation, so integral invariance [F11] makes the integral zero. If , the integrand is identically one and [F5] gives total measure one; hence the integral is one.
Step 2.1 gives the unnormalized and normalized sphere diagonal moments; step 2.2 gives the off-diagonal sphere moments; step 3.1 gives all distinguished-torus moments. Together these are exactly the three displayed formulas.
The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , and let be a nonempty open set. Read as through Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary. Give the trace of the Lebesgue sigma-algebra and the restricted measure induced by , namely for ; write for the resulting complex space.
Let be the holomorphic functions on with , and let The argument below shows that each such class has a unique holomorphic representative and that is a closed complex linear subspace of . Give it the inherited inner product which is linear in the first variable. Thus is a Hilbert space.
For each , evaluation is a bounded linear functional on . Riesz representation gives a unique such that The Bergman kernel is where means evaluation of the unique holomorphic representative of . In particular and the displayed Riesz identity is the reproducing property. For , and ; no positivity of is asserted for general unbounded .
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle is ; it is used by the Lebesgue, complex , Bergman mean/evaluation, and Riesz suppliers, and to select an approximating sequence in the closedness argument. No full Axiom of Choice is used (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
is a complete measure on the Lebesgue sigma-algebra of . Its trace on the open, hence Lebesgue-measurable, set is a measure on the trace sigma-algebra (Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function , Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume, The trace of a sigma-algebra on a subset, The trace of a sigma-algebra is a sigma-algebra on the traced subset, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable).
Holomorphic functions on are continuous; their restrictions are Borel measurable on the subspace , and the subspace Borel sigma-algebra is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra, hence is contained in the trace Lebesgue sigma-algebra (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of , Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic, The Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable).
Complex linear combinations of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).
With the pairing , complex is a Hilbert space under ; the pairing is linear in its first variable and induces the quotient norm (The complex pairing on equivalence classes, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
On each nonempty compact , point evaluation is bounded by (Sup-norm and first-derivative bounds by the norm on compact subsets).
An limit class of holomorphic functions has a holomorphic representative (Sup-norm and first-derivative bounds by the norm on compact subsets).
For a holomorphic on a polydisc with closure in , where is the polydisc of positive radii (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in , The mean-value bound for holomorphic functions on a polydisc).
Every bounded linear functional on a complex Hilbert space has a unique Riesz representer with (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
Proof
Given: , , a nonempty open , and the Lebesgue measure and function-space conventions above.
By [F2], every holomorphic function is measurable for , so the definition of is meaningful. If determine the same class, then is holomorphic by [F3] and has by [F4]. For each , the singleton is compact, so [F5] gives . Thus on , proving uniqueness of the holomorphic representative and well-definedness of evaluation.
If , then for every and every , [F7] gives . Letting and using gives for every , so .
The image is a complex linear subspace by [F3] and [F4]. To prove it is closed, let lie in its closure. For each , the set of classes within distance of is nonempty; [A1] selects a sequence of such classes, and step 1.1 gives each a unique holomorphic representative . Then in , so [F6] supplies a holomorphic representative of . Since , this representative belongs to , and . Hence the image is closed.
The closed subspace of the Hilbert space in [F4] is complete: each Cauchy sequence in it converges in and its limit lies in by step 2.1. For fixed , evaluation is well-defined by step 1.1, complex-linear by [F3], and bounded by [F5] with . Applying [F8] gives a unique such that for every .
Define using the unique holomorphic representative from step 1.1. Then and the identity in step 3.1 is exactly the reproducing property. If , step 1.2 gives , so every evaluation functional and its unique Riesz representer vanish; hence .
is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , and let be a nonempty open set. The Bergman space of The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel is a closed complex linear subspace of .
Let be any complete orthonormal system of , when one exists. For arbitrary , interpret each sum as the net of finite subsum values ordered by inclusion. Then for all , For every pair of nonempty compact sets and every , there is a finite such that for every finite , Thus the series converges absolutely and uniformly on compact subsets of with its Euclidean product metric and is independent of the chosen complete orthonormal system; an empty compact set gives a vacuous uniform-convergence claim. The kernel is holomorphic in , antiholomorphic in , and .
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle is . It is inherited through the preceding Bergman-space closure argument, the arbitrary-index Fourier expansion, and Riesz representation; this proof uses no full Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
is a closed complex Hilbert subspace of for the first-variable-linear integral pairing (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel).
For every nonempty compact , point evaluation and all first complex partials are bounded by constants times the norm (Sup-norm and first-derivative bounds by the norm on compact subsets).
For a complete orthonormal family in a Hilbert space, the finite-subset Fourier net converges in norm to each vector (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space).
For a finite orthonormal projection , both and the residual are contractions by Pythagoras; for finite , (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Pythagoras and finite orthogonal sums).
For finite scalar lists, Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the sum of products by the product of the norms (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ).
For holomorphic , ; holomorphic functions are continuous and finite linear combinations remain holomorphic (A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic, Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).
Holomorphicity gives total differentiability through the real coordinate dictionary, and the total-derivative chain rule gives the derivative along an affine line (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of , The total (Fréchet) derivative as the linear first-order approximation with remainder, The chain rule for total derivatives: , Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary).
A continuous differentiable curve in the Banach space whose derivative has norm at most varies by at most times the parameter distance; is Banach for its usual modulus norm (Banach space, The complex plane is complete, and convergence is equivalent to convergence of real and imaginary parts, Mean value inequality for a differentiable Banach-valued curve).
Every point of an open metric set has a ball inside it; positive-radius Euclidean closed balls are compact, and continuous images of compact spaces are compact. A norm induces the metric (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric, A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism).
Every at most countable infinite set is in bijection with ; finite support is handled by a finite sum (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions on an open set is holomorphic (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, with locally uniform convergence of all derivatives).
Riesz representation is isometric: the representing vector has norm equal to the functional norm (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces); the Hilbert pairing is conjugate symmetric (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).
A compact metric space has a finite subcover for every open cover, and a compact subset is compact in the restricted metric (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).
With the Euclidean product metric , each coordinate projection is -Lipschitz. Hence the coordinate projections of a compact subset are compact and contain it in their product (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism).
Each evaluation is bounded and has a unique Riesz representer with , and (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel).
The coefficient support of each vector for a complete orthonormal family is at most countable (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space).
For an arbitrary index set, a scalar sum is the limit of its finite-subset net (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ).
Proof
Given: , , a nonempty open , and a complete orthonormal system of .
The closedness assertion is the closed-subspace conclusion already proved in The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel; the inner product and pointwise representatives are those fixed there.
Fix and let for finite . By [F3], in . For each , the reproducing identity in [F15] and conjugate symmetry [F12] give , so . For every nonempty compact , the compact evaluation bound [F2] gives ; the empty case is vacuous.
Fix . By [F9] choose with , and put , a compact subset of . For the segment , , stays in by the triangle inequality. Write for the multi-index with a in coordinate and zeros elsewhere. For with , [F7] gives ; by [F2] and finite Cauchy–Schwarz [F5], its modulus is at most , where . The curve is continuous by [F6], so [F8] yields . Taking the supremum over the unit ball of proves ; by the isometry in [F12], . Thus is locally Lipschitz and continuous.
If is a compact subset of in its norm metric, the net converges to uniformly for ; the empty case is vacuous. For , the norm balls of radius centered at points of are open by the triangle inequality and form a cover in that metric, so [F13] gives a finite subcover with centers . For each center choose a finite with whenever , using [F3]. For and , contraction of from [F4] gives . By [F9] and step 1.3, and are compact for compact , so this uniform convergence applies to both section families.
Fix . By [F16], the support of is at most countable; if it is finite the expansion is finite, and otherwise [F10] enumerates it by a sequence. The corresponding finite partial sums converge to in norm by [F3] and uniformly on every compact subset in the variable by [F2]. Each partial sum is holomorphic in by [F6], so [F11] makes holomorphic.
Let as in step 1.2. Step 2.1 and [F2] show uniformly on each with compact. For , apply step 2.1 to the compact sets and with tolerance , and take the union of the resulting finite index sets. For every finite , finite Cauchy–Schwarz [F5] and the orthogonal projections [F4], with , give uniformly on . Thus the series converges absolutely and uniformly there. Any compact subset of is contained in the product of its compact coordinate projections by [F14], so the convergence holds on every such compact subset.
For , by the reproducing identity [F15], so conjugate symmetry [F12] gives . Thus the kernel is antiholomorphic in as well as holomorphic in by step 2.2. Since step 3.1 identifies every complete orthonormal system's sum with the kernel defined in [F15], the expansion is basis-independent.
Monomials form complete orthogonal systems of the Bergman spaces of the disc, the ball and the polydisc
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) and let . For and , the monomials in each of , and are pairwise orthogonal. Their squared norms are, respectively, Thus the normalized monomials form complete orthonormal systems in all three Bergman spaces. Equivalently, for each of these domains , a function orthogonal to every monomial is identically zero.
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle is : it enters through the Bergman Hilbert structure, monomial norms, real-linear change of variables for rotations, Borel-to-Lebesgue measurability, and the Hilbert-space completeness criterion; no full Axiom of Choice is used (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The Bergman definition identifies with holomorphic classes, gives the first-variable-linear integral pairing, and provides their unique holomorphic representatives (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel).
The monomial square norms on the disc, ball and polydisc are the formulas in the statement; they are positive and finite (Weighted monomial integrals and monomial norms for the disc, ball and polydisc).
Each coordinate projection is holomorphic since its increment at in direction is ; finite products of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and holomorphic functions are continuous (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of , Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic).
On every polydisc centered at whose closure lies in the domain, the Taylor series of a holomorphic function converges absolutely and uniformly on each smaller closed polydisc (A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc).
The Taylor coefficients at are independent of which such centered polydisc is used (The coefficients of a convergent multi-indexed power series are its derivative coefficients, hence unique).
For with , ; if , then raised to the th power is . Complex multiplication is associative and commutative, and conjugation preserves products and modulus; in particular implies (, , and , , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, Integer powers in the complex field, is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Multiplication of one coordinate by acts on its real coordinate pair by , whose determinant is ; all other real coordinates are fixed, so the full determinant is also . If , the rotation preserves each of the three domains and its dilates. Applying the linear change-of-variables theorem to the inverse rotation shows that every restricted map is measurable and measure preserving (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, Measure-preserving transformations and systems, A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not).
Integrals of integrable complex functions are invariant under a measure-preserving map (Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).
The unit ball and polydisc dilates are bounded open sets; their closures are compact subsets of the corresponding unit domains when (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in , Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space). Every ambient open cover of such a compact subset has a finite subcover (A subset of a metric space is open in the subspace metric exactly when it is the trace of an open set of the ambient space, and it is compact as a metric space in its own right exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it).
A pointwise almost-everywhere limit dominated by one integrable nonnegative function has convergent complex integrals (Dominated convergence).
For , the product is integrable and (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
Borel sets are Lebesgue measurable, continuous functions are Borel measurable, and open dilates are Borel sets (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable).
The nonnegative integral is monotone; in particular (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, Weighted monomial integrals and monomial norms for the disc, ball and polydisc).
An orthonormal family in a Hilbert space is complete exactly when its orthogonal complement is (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases, Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family).
The integral of a finite sum of integrable complex functions is the corresponding finite sum of their integrals (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
If are continuous complex functions, then is continuous: near any point , , and continuity of bounds it locally; conjugation preserves modulus (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Under , is Hilbert and the preceding theorem makes a closed subspace, hence a Hilbert space (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).
Proof
Given: , one of , or (with in the disc case), and when testing completeness.
The preceding monomial-integral lemma gives the three squared-norm formulas in the statement. Every value is positive and finite, so each monomial belongs to the corresponding Bergman space and can be normalized.
Let and choose with . Set and . The coordinate rotation , fixing the other coordinates, maps and every onto themselves and preserves Lebesgue measure by [F7]. For , one has : if the factor is , and if it is . Invariance [F8] gives , so in . Integrability follows from [F2] and [F11]; therefore . Hence distinct monomials are orthogonal, and the normalized family is orthonormal.
Fix and set . By [F9], is compact and contained in . For each , choose a positive polyradius with and for all : if , take ; if , take with ; and if , take . These choices exist since and . Choose and with for every , possible because there are finitely many strict coordinate inequalities. Holomorphy gives the continuity and separate holomorphy required by [F4]. Define the box partial sums . By [F4], these sums converge uniformly on each closed polydisc strictly inside , including . If two admissible radii are used, restrict both expansions to a smaller common centered polydisc and apply [F5]; hence their coefficient families agree. The family of all such open polydiscs covers , without selecting one for each point. By A subset of a metric space is open in the subspace metric exactly when it is the trace of an open set of the ambient space, and it is compact as a metric space in its own right exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it, this ambient open cover has a finite subcover; a common cutoff for its finitely many uniform convergences shows that these same box partial sums converge uniformly to on .
Fix and a multi-index . The box partial sums from step 1.3 converge uniformly on , so they are uniformly bounded there by a finite . Since on and by [F13], the measurable functions are dominated by the integrable function ; measurability follows from [F3], [F12] and [F16], and dominated convergence [F10] permits passing their integrals to the limit. For every , finite-sum linearity [F15] and the rotation argument of step 1.2 give , since every off-diagonal monomial moment vanishes on by that same rotation argument. Taking the limit yields .
Suppose is orthogonal to every monomial. Let , so and increases to . For each , the functions converge pointwise to and are dominated by , which is integrable by [F11]; measurability follows from [F3], [F12] and [F16]. Also converges to and is dominated by it, which is integrable by [F2]; its measurability follows by the same facts. Applying [F10] to both sequences and using step 2.1 gives . The norm in [F2] is positive, so for every .
Step 1.3 supplies the Taylor expansion on each , and the dilates exhaust . Since all coefficients vanish by step 3.1, this expansion gives at every point of . Thus the only element of orthogonal to every monomial is .
Step 1.2 makes the normalized monomials an orthonormal family, and step 4.1 makes its orthogonal complement zero. By [F17] the Bergman space is Hilbert, so the zero-complement-to-completeness direction of [F14] shows that this family is complete. Conversely, if the family is complete, every vector orthogonal to its members is orthogonal to their dense linear span and hence, by Cauchy–Schwarz [F11], to itself; it must then be zero. Thus both directions of the stated equivalence hold, and the norm formulas and completeness establish all three asserted complete orthonormal systems.
Reproducing property, Bergman projection and the extremal characterization
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , and let be a nonempty open set. Write for the Riesz section at , and let be the Hilbert orthogonal projection. Then for every :
- For every , .
- For every , ; is linear, self-adjoint and contractive, and for .
- and for every . If , the maximizers in the supremum are exactly with ; if , every member of the closed unit ball attains the supremum, which is .
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle is , inherited through the Bergman Hilbert-space structure and the orthogonal-decomposition and projection suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is used (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
is a closed complex linear subspace of the Hilbert space , with the first-variable-linear integral pairing and unique holomorphic representatives (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).
For a closed subspace of a Hilbert space, each has a unique decomposition with and ; is the Hilbert orthogonal projection and is the identity on (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace).
The Hilbert orthogonal projection is linear, self-adjoint and contractive (Hilbert projections are linear, self-adjoint and contractive).
Evaluation at has unique Riesz representer , , and (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel).
Cauchy–Schwarz gives , with equality exactly when the pair is linearly dependent (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
Proof
Given: , a nonempty open , its Bergman space , and .
By [F4], evaluation at is represented by , so for each , . The definition gives the stated reproducing integral.
By [F1], is a closed subspace of , so [F2] defines its unique orthogonal projection . The projection lemma [F3] gives linearity, self-adjointness and contractivity; [F2] also gives for .
For , [F2] gives and by [F4]. Hence . Applying step 1.1 to and using linearity in the first variable, ; expanding as gives the displayed integral.
Applying step 1.1 to gives . For any , [F4] and [F5] imply , so the supremum over the unit ball is at most . If , the unit vector attains this bound. Any other maximizer must give equality in [F5], hence is linearly dependent on ; its norm must be , so it is exactly with . If , step 1.1 gives for every , so the supremum is and every function in the unit ball attains it.
Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , let , let , and give the normalized polar surface measure of Monomial integrals on the sphere and orthonormality on the distinguished torus. Let be the closure of the traces of in , as in The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain.
-
If is holomorphic on an open neighbourhood of , its Taylor polynomials at converge uniformly to on . More generally, polynomial traces are dense in the trace subspace and hence is the closure of the polynomial traces.
-
For , The normalized monomials form a complete orthonormal system of .
-
For each , set Then every polynomial satisfies .
-
Every has a unique holomorphic extension to . It is the locally uniform limit of any sequence whose traces converge to in . For every , ; thus trace evaluation is well-defined and bounded, and each extended evaluation has a unique Riesz representer in . In particular, is Szegő-regular.
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle used is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It selects countably many polynomial approximants or trace generators; the Hilbert-space and surface-measure conventions in The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain and its suppliers also assume only . No full Axiom of Choice is used.
Under , , the open unit ball is bounded and convex, and its closure is the closed Euclidean unit ball (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in , Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary). Its closure is compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
The unit ball is path-connected by the segments , and hence connected (Paths, path-connected spaces and path components, Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component). It is a nonempty bounded domain with boundary in the convention of Bounded C1 domains and their outward normals. Indeed, put and take in real coordinates; since , some coordinate is nonzero, and after the rigid change of coordinates that moves slot to the last position and, when , reflects that coordinate, one has with and . The polynomial has continuous partial derivatives and (For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative), so it is , and ; the implicit function theorem (The Euclidean implicit function theorem with derivative formula) therefore supplies neighbourhoods of and of , with after shrinking, and a unique function with for . Since on , the map is strictly decreasing on for each , so there; because , this gives , that is, locally exactly the subgraph of the function , whose graph is locally the sphere. The chart surface measure on equals polar surface measure (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure); the sphere moment formula gives and after normalization (Monomial integrals on the sphere and orthonormality on the distinguished torus). Thus this normalization is for , as required in The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain.
The trace subspace and Hardy space are and ; the pairing is , linear in its first variable (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain, The complex pairing on equivalence classes). Under , this space is Hilbert ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
For all , the sphere monomial moments are (Monomial integrals on the sphere and orthonormality on the distinguished torus). Multi-index notation has , , and ( maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
A holomorphic function on an open set is continuous there and has an absolutely convergent local power series on a sufficiently small centered polydisc (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of , A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic, A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc). Absolute convergence permits regrouping by total degree (Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum), and one-variable power-series coefficients are unique (A complex power-series representation about a fixed centre has unique coefficients).
A one-variable holomorphic function has its Taylor expansion on every centered disc contained in its domain, and if its modulus is at most on the circle of radius , its -th Taylor coefficient has modulus at most (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain, Cauchy's inequalities bound the Taylor coefficients by the circle supremum).
The closed Euclidean ball is compact; every ambient open cover of a compact subset has a finite subcover by A subset of a metric space is open in the subspace metric exactly when it is the trace of an open set of the ambient space, and it is compact as a metric space in its own right exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it, and metric balls are open in the Euclidean metric topology (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space, Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open sets are open, open balls are open and closed balls are closed, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary). A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space has a finite maximum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value). The Euclidean norm is continuous (The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for every norm on satisfies and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for ), a continuous function on the compact closed ball is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous), and complex modulus is subadditive, which implies (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
For a finite coefficient family, Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the absolute value of its scalar product by the product of the two Euclidean norms (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs). For , (The multinomial coefficient equals , and in ).
The natural powers are defined recursively, and the series converges for by the ratio test: its successive-term ratio is (Integer powers , Ratio test: gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, and gives divergence). The geometric series with ratio converges (For , , and for the series diverges).
A locally uniform limit of holomorphic functions on an open set is holomorphic there (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, with locally uniform convergence of all derivatives).
Each bounded linear functional on a complex Hilbert space has a unique Riesz representer; in the first-variable-linear convention (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces). The complete orthonormal-system condition means that the closed linear span is the whole Hilbert space (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).
Proof
Given: , , the unit ball , its sphere , and normalized polar surface measure .
The segment from to each stays in , so [F2] puts in the domain class of The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain. By [F2], its normalized polar surface measure is an allowed positive multiple of chart surface measure.
Let be holomorphic on an open neighbourhood of . Consider the family of metric balls with , , and . It covers : openness supplies such a radius at each point, and the family is defined by this property, so no uncountable choice of radii is made. The ambient-cover implication of A subset of a metric space is open in the subspace metric exactly when it is the trace of an open set of the ambient space, and it is compact as a metric space in its own right exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it gives a finite subcover , and let . If , put , so and . Choose an index whose covering ball contains ; then , hence . Therefore .
Fix with . Continuity of and the modulus inequality in [F7] make continuous on the compact closed ball of radius ; let . For each , the function is holomorphic on : if , complex differentiability of gives , and for it is constant.
The local power series of at is . For each fixed and sufficiently small , absolute convergence lets us group , where . Uniqueness of power-series coefficients identifies as the -th Taylor coefficient of . The one-variable Cauchy estimate [F6], applied on , gives , uniformly for . Thus ; the Taylor polynomials converge uniformly to on the closed ball.
Let . For , is holomorphic on the neighbourhood of the closed unit ball. Uniform continuity of on that compact ball gives uniformly there as . For each positive integer , choose close enough to that , then use step 2.1 to choose a polynomial with . The countable selection is allowed by [A1], and . Since , uniform convergence implies in . Hence polynomial traces are dense in , and by the definition of in [F3] their closure is all of .
By [F4], distinct monomial traces are orthogonal and . Thus is an orthonormal family. Its finite linear span is exactly the polynomial traces, dense by step 3.1; the definition in [F11] therefore makes it a complete orthonormal system. In particular the zero multi-index has norm squared , and for every monomial has norm squared .
If , then and the bound is immediate. Otherwise write for a finite set . Orthogonality in [F4] gives . Cauchy–Schwarz and [F8] give, for , . Indeed, the degree- part of the full sum is , by the multinomial identity. When , this coefficient is for every and the series is . The final series converges by [F9], proving the claimed bound with the displayed .
If , choose the uniform polynomial approximants from step 3.1. For each , step 5.1 bounds by . Uniform convergence gives , and convergence gives . Taking the limit pointwise and then the supremum over proves . If two trace generators determine the same class, apply this bound to their difference for every ; their holomorphic functions agree throughout . Thus trace evaluation is well-defined, and for any , choose to get .
Given , [F3] and [A1] give a sequence whose traces converge to in . If a compact is nonempty, the norm attains a maximum on by [F7]; choose , so . For empty the convergence assertion is automatic. Step 6.1 applied to then shows that is uniformly Cauchy on . Its limit is holomorphic by [F10], independent of the approximating sequence by the same estimate, and agrees with every trace generator by applying it to the constant sequence at that generator. Hence it is the unique extension represented by the convergent sequence. Passing the bound in step 6.1 to the limit gives whenever . At each , this limit extends the well-defined bounded linear trace evaluation from step 6.1; the extension is linear because the trace subspace is dense and linearity passes to limits.
The Hilbert-space and pairing assumptions for are [F3]. The Riesz theorem [F11] therefore supplies a unique with for every . Step 7.1 makes holomorphic, so the pair is Szegő-regular by The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain.
Smoothness of the Bergman kernel and positivity of its diagonal on bounded domains
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be a nonempty open set. Then and is on . If is bounded, its Lebesgue measure satisfies , and for every ,
In particular, on a bounded domain is .
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle assumed is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is inherited through the Bergman Hilbert-space and Riesz setup, and is used by the Borel and Euclidean-ball measure suppliers below; no full Axiom of Choice is used.
Under , is a closed complex Hilbert subspace of with the first-variable-linear pairing. Point evaluation has Riesz section and reproduces evaluation. The definition also gives and , so no positivity is asserted for every unbounded open set (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, The complex pairing on equivalence classes, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
The definition makes holomorphic. Reproduction gives , so conjugate symmetry of the first-variable-linear pairing gives ; hence the kernel is antiholomorphic in (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, The complex pairing on equivalence classes, with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
On every nonempty compact , . The diagonal extremal identity is (Sup-norm and first-derivative bounds by the norm on compact subsets, Reproducing property, Bergman projection and the extremal characterization).
The first-variable-linear Hilbert pairing satisfies (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
A separately holomorphic, locally bounded function on an open subset of is jointly holomorphic there (Locally bounded and separately holomorphic implies holomorphic).
A holomorphic function on an open subset of complex Euclidean space is in the underlying real coordinates (Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic).
Complex conjugation is a real-linear coordinate map, and finite-order smooth maps are closed under composition (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition).
The complex Euclidean metric is the real Euclidean metric under . An open nonempty set contains a positive-radius ball, a bounded set is contained in some ball, and Euclidean balls have finite positive Lebesgue measure. Open sets are Borel and Lebesgue measurable, and measure is monotone (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric, The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space, For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable, Measures are monotone).
For , and is continuous. For each integer , ; products and quotients of continuous functions are continuous where their denominators are nonzero (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm, Integer powers , For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ). A real function is when all iterated coordinate partial derivatives of every finite order exist and are continuous ( maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).
Proof
Given: , , a nonempty open , its Bergman space , and its Bergman kernel .
For each , is holomorphic in by [F1, F2]. Reproducing evaluation at on gives . Conjugate symmetry then gives . Thus is antiholomorphic in , and is separately holomorphic on , where .
Suppose is bounded. Choose ; openness gives with . Boundedness supplies and with . The Euclidean triangle inequality then gives . By [F8], is measurable and . Hence .
Let be nonempty compact sets. The evaluation estimate [F3] and the diagonal extremal identity [F3] give for and for . Since , Cauchy–Schwarz [F4] gives on . Around any choose closed Euclidean ball neighborhoods contained in ; they are compact by [F8]. This proves that is locally bounded on .
Suppose is bounded. For let be the constant function. By step 1.2 it lies in and has norm one. The extremal identity [F3] gives .
The set is open because complex conjugation is a Euclidean isometry, so is an open subset of . By [F5], the separately holomorphic, locally bounded function is jointly holomorphic.
By [F6], is in real coordinates. The map and the diagonal map are real-linear coordinate maps, hence smooth; [F7] makes their compositions with smooth. Therefore is on , and is on .
Let . On a bounded , steps 4.1 and 2.2 give with . Set for . By [F9], , and induction using the negative-power derivative in [F9] gives for every . These derivatives are continuous on by [F9], and itself is continuous there; hence . The composition theorem [F7] now gives .
Steps 2.1 and 4.1 establish joint smoothness and the smooth diagonal for every nonempty open ; steps 1.2, 2.2 and 5.1 establish the positive diagonal bound and smooth logarithmic potential whenever is bounded. These are the two claims.
Transformation law of the Bergman kernel under a biholomorphism
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be domains, and let be a biholomorphism. Write . Then for every , and
The pullback , defined on the unique holomorphic representatives by , is a unitary isomorphism (a surjective linear isometry), with
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle assumed is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Under it, the Bergman spaces are Hilbert spaces of unique holomorphic representatives with first-variable-linear inner products, Riesz sections, and reproducing kernels; the real change-of-variables supplier and Hilbert-adjoint definition also use only (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, Reproducing property, Bergman projection and the extremal characterization, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions, The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator).
A biholomorphism and its inverse are holomorphic maps. Their components are holomorphic scalar functions, hence smooth in real coordinates, so under both are real maps and is a diffeomorphism (Biholomorphic maps between open sets in , A map into is holomorphic exactly when each of its components is, Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary).
The entries of the complex Jacobian matrix are the component derivatives , which are holomorphic; its determinant is a finite sum of products of these entries, so is holomorphic. Composition of holomorphic maps is holomorphic (Holomorphic maps and the complex Jacobian matrix, A map into is holomorphic exactly when each of its components is, Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic, Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic, The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product).
The complex Jacobian determinant is multiplicative under composition. Applying this to gives , hence (The complex Jacobian determinant of a composite of equidimensional holomorphic maps is the product).
For a -linear map with complex determinant , the real determinant under is (The real Jacobian determinant of a complex-linear automorphism is the squared modulus of its complex determinant).
For the real diffeomorphism underlying , Lebesgue change of variables gives for every complex . The Bergman measures are restrictions of this Lebesgue measure (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions, The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary).
The Bergman section satisfies ; the pairing is linear in its first variable (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, Reproducing property, Bergman projection and the extremal characterization).
For a bounded linear operator between Hilbert spaces, its adjoint is characterized by . An isometry is bounded with bound (The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces).
If , then by Cauchy–Schwarz (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
Proof
Given: , domains , and a biholomorphism .
By [F1], and are smooth as real maps under the Euclidean identification, so is a real diffeomorphism between the corresponding open subsets of .
Applying [F3] to gives for every . Thus .
By [F2], is holomorphic, and the chain rule makes holomorphic for ; hence is holomorphic. Applying [F4] and [F5] to gives , so and . For , [F8] gives , and [F4]–[F5] yield . Pointwise linearity makes a linear isometry preserving the inner product.
Apply step 2.1 to as well. For each , lies in , and [F3] gives . Thus is onto with inverse , so it is a unitary isomorphism. For every , inner-product preservation and surjectivity give for all ; by [F7], . Finally, for and , [F6] gives , where . Nondegeneracy of the inner product yields .
Since , step 3.1 gives . Evaluating the unique holomorphic representatives at gives , the asserted transformation law.
The Bergman metric form on a bounded domain
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , and let be a bounded domain, meaning a nonempty connected open set. Use the first-variable-linear Bergman kernel of The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel. By Smoothness of the Bergman kernel and positivity of its diagonal on bounded domains, is a real-valued function on .
Using the one-based coordinate aliases for the library's zero-based coordinates from The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity, define the Bergman metric form at by the Hermitian form Because is real-valued and , expanding the Wirtinger operators and commuting real mixed partials gives (Wirtinger operators in , Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives), so this form is Hermitian. Its associated quadratic form is the Levi form of at ; write its matrix as . The pair is the Bergman (pseudo-)metric. This definition does not assert positive definiteness; the separate positivity theorem on this page proves it for bounded domains.
Remarks
The assumption is inherited through the Bergman Hilbert-space/Riesz construction and its smoothness/positive-diagonal supplier. The definition itself makes no additional selections and uses no full Axiom of Choice.
The multinomial theorem for finitely many complex variables
Statement
Let , let and be as in The multinomial coefficient as the number of ordered partitions of an -set into blocks of prescribed sizes, and let . Write for the canonical natural of The canonical natural of a field. Then
For every , the same coefficient satisfies The sum on the right is the finite sum in the additive commutative monoid of ; the statement includes and .
Facts & Assumptions
is finite and is a natural number. When , and for (The multinomial coefficient as the number of ordered partitions of an -set into blocks of prescribed sizes, The multinomial coefficient equals , and in ).
For and , (The binomial theorem over the complex field).
For , ; and if , then and (Order on the natural numbers, The multinomial coefficient equals , and in , for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and ).
Every factorial is a nonzero natural number (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
Multiplication in cancels a common nonzero factor (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).
The canonical natural is defined by and ; complex integer powers use and (The canonical natural of a field, Integer powers in the complex field).
The additive structure of is a commutative monoid. Its finite sums over finite sets are independent of enumeration and invariant under bijective reindexing; finite products in the multiplicative monoid use the same finite-list recursion (Semigroup and monoid, is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set, Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule, The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity).
The natural operations satisfy , , , and (Addition of natural numbers, Multiplication of natural numbers).
Complex field arithmetic is associative and distributive, and integer powers of nonzero elements obey the usual exponent laws ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , Laws of integer exponents).
Induction on is valid (The principle of mathematical induction).
Proof
Given: Naturals , the finite index set , and complex numbers for .
The canonical natural preserves addition and multiplication in . For fixed , induction [F10] on proves : the base case uses , and the successor case uses and the recursion in [F6]. A second induction on proves : at both sides are , and at the successor use , the first identity, and distributivity in [F9]. Also . Applying [F3] and the multiplicative property just proved successively along the finite product recursion [F7] gives the coefficient identity in the statement.
For , the left side is . If , both sides equal : the right side has the single empty tuple, coefficient , and empty product . If , the right side is an empty sum and the left side is ; this proves the formula in dimension zero.
Fix and assume the formula holds for this dimension for every exponent and every -tuple of complex numbers.
Let , put , and fix . The complex binomial theorem [F2], followed by the induction hypothesis [step 1.3] for each , expands as the finite double sum over and whose summand is .
For every pair in step 2.1, let . This is a bijection from the pair index set to its inverse takes the first coordinates as and their natural sum as . Put . By [F3], ; also [F3] gives , so . The factor is nonzero, since by [F4]; hence [F5] gives . Step 1.1 carries this identity to the canonical naturals in , and the power laws [F6], [F9] identify the accompanying monomial with .
Reindex the finite double sum of step 2.1 along the bijection in step 3.1. Its coefficients and monomials become exactly those in the asserted formula for variables. The base case step 1.2 and this inductive step prove the statement for every by [F7] and induction. If all variables are zero and , every has a positive coordinate, so every monomial on the right vanishes; if , step 1.2 checks . For , the sole index is and its multinomial coefficient is by the coloring definition, so the formula reduces to .
Bergman kernels of the disc, ball and polydisc, and Szegő kernels of the disc and ball
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , and use Lebesgue measure on with the first-variable-linear pairing. Write for the standard Hermitian inner product. Then
Let be normalized Haar measure on , and let be normalized polar surface measure on . The pairs and are Szegő-regular, with kernels
Each displayed Bergman kernel reproduces the corresponding space and is the unique such kernel. Each displayed Szegő kernel reproduces the corresponding boundary Hardy space and is its unique Riesz kernel. No smooth-boundary Szegő construction is asserted for the polydisc.
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice axiom assumed is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It supplies the Bergman and Hardy Hilbert/Riesz constructions and the Hilbert Fourier expansion used below; no full Axiom of Choice is used.
The normalized monomials form complete orthonormal systems in , , and , with squared norms , , and , respectively (Monomials form complete orthogonal systems of the Bergman spaces of the disc, the ball and the polydisc).
For a complete orthonormal system of a Bergman space, its kernel is ; the sum converges absolutely and uniformly on compact subsets ( is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).
The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series is absolutely convergent, with sum the product of the sums (The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series converges absolutely to the product of their sums).
For a real with , (For , , and for the series diverges).
Conjugation is multiplicative, , , and exactly when (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Complex series are limits of their finite partial sums, and absolute convergence is defined by the real modulus series (Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence, Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series). An absolutely convergent complex series converges (Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum).
Cauchy–Schwarz holds in complex inner-product spaces (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs); the coordinate pairing is the standard complex inner product (The standard formulas on and on are inner products).
The Euclidean norm on is , and its balls are the stated unit balls (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ).
The complex multinomial expansion holds for every (The multinomial theorem for finitely many complex variables).
For every , (The multinomial theorem for finitely many complex variables).
The disc Hardy pair is Szegő-regular and has kernel under normalized Haar measure (The disc trace space is the Hardy boundary space and the Szegő family reproduces ).
The ball Hardy pair is Szegő-regular; extended evaluation is bounded and has a unique Riesz representer (Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space).
The normalized ball boundary monomials form a complete orthonormal system with squared norms (Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space).
A complete orthonormal family has a norm-convergent Fourier expansion by the net of finite-subset sums (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space).
The binomial coefficient vanishes when its lower argument exceeds its upper argument, and (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient , Pascal's rule , and the hockey-stick identity ).
If , then ; every factorial is a nonzero natural ( for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and , The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
On a Szegő-regular pair, each extended evaluation has a unique Riesz representer and the Szegő kernel is defined from those representers (The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain).
The Bergman kernel reproduces evaluation on (Reproducing property, Bergman projection and the extremal characterization).
Each point evaluation on has a unique Riesz representer, whose holomorphic representative defines the Bergman kernel (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel).
The canonical natural in is the image of the real canonical natural under the embedded copy ; the natural map into preserves finite sums and products, and positive natural numbers map to positive reals (The canonical natural of a field, is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , Laws of finite sums and products in , and , Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
The degree shells are finite, every finite subset of is contained in a finite union of initial degree shells, and finite sums may be reindexed along bijections (The multinomial coefficient as the number of ordered partitions of an -set into blocks of prescribed sizes, A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set, Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule).
Induction on the natural numbers is valid (The principle of mathematical induction).
Natural powers are recursively defined; , and conjugation of a natural power is the corresponding power of the conjugate (Integer powers in the complex field, Laws of integer exponents, with the last identity following by induction from the recursion and [F5]).
Proof
Given: , the unit disc, unit ball and unit polydisc, and the normalized boundary measures.
The series parameters lie in the unit disc. If , or if , then or coordinatewise. If , [F8] gives by [F9]. Thus every denominator below is nonzero.
The disc pair with normalized Haar measure is Szegő-regular and has kernel by [F12]. The Szegő definition [F18] makes each kernel section the unique Riesz representer of its extended evaluation, so this is the unique disc Szegő kernel.
Fix a complex with . By induction from the power recursion [F24] and modulus multiplicativity [F5], for every . The real geometric series for converges by [F4], so is absolutely convergent and converges by [F6], say to . The finite identity follows by telescoping in the field [F21]; [F7] gives , hence . Since , ; taking limits gives .
For every integer , define . Step 2.1 is the base . If is absolutely convergent with sum , its Cauchy product with is absolutely convergent and has sum by [F3]. The coefficient of in this product is . Set ; the hockey-stick identity [F16] sums from to , and [F16] makes each omitted term with zero. Thus the coefficient is . By [F21] this natural identity also holds for the coefficients embedded in . Thus the product is exactly , proving the identity for every by induction [F23].
On the disc, the normalized monomials from [F1] give , which is the stated formula by step 3.1. On the polydisc, [F2] gives the monomial expansion. Its finite degree shells are cofinal among finite subsets by [F22], so the shell sums have the same limit as the kernel expansion. Repeated Cauchy products [F3] show that the degree- shell sum is the degree- coefficient in the product of the absolutely convergent series ; hence summing the shells gives their product.
For , put . The Bergman expansion [F2] and ball monomial norms [F1] give . The degree shells are finite and cofinal by [F22], so their partial sums converge to this kernel. In the shell , the multinomial expansion [F10] applied to gives , using [F24] for powers and conjugation. Also [F11] gives , while [F17] gives after [F21] identifies the real and complex canonical naturals. The factorial denominator is positive by [F17, F21], so division gives in the corresponding real scalars. The degree- block is therefore . Step 3.1 sums these blocks to the stated formula.
Let be the ball Szegő Riesz representer from [F13], and let be its complete orthonormal boundary monomials by [F14]. By [F15], . For any finite subset of indices, the first-variable-linear reproducing identity gives and hence . The finite degree shells are cofinal by [F22]; applying the bounded evaluation at from [F13] to the Fourier sums over those shells gives . For each shell, [F10] applied to gives , using [F24] for powers and conjugation. Since , [F11] gives , and [F17] gives after [F21] identifies canonical natural scalars. The factorial denominator is positive by [F17, F21], so division gives the degree- block . Step 3.1 with sums these blocks to . The Szegő definition [F18] gives uniqueness of this Riesz kernel.
The basis expansions in steps 4.1 and 4.2 are the Bergman Riesz kernels by [F2], so [F19] supplies their reproducing identities; uniqueness follows from the Bergman-space Riesz definition [F20]. Steps 1.2 and 4.3 establish the two Szegő reproducing kernels and uniqueness. Setting either kernel variable to in the displayed formulas (equivalently, retaining only the degree-zero monomial term) gives , , , and both stated Szegő values . When , and , and the corresponding formulas agree. The polydisc appears only in the Bergman product formula, so no boundary regularity is claimed for it.
The Bergman metric is positive definite on bounded domains and biholomorphically invariant
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) and let . Let be a bounded domain with Bergman kernel , Bergman metric form , and quadratic form as in The Bergman metric form on a bounded domain, and use the one-based coordinate aliases of The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity.
-
For every and every , where . The supremum is finite, positive, and attained. In particular , so the Hermitian form is positive definite.
-
If is a biholomorphism of bounded domains, then for all and all , Equivalently, for every .
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice principle assumed is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()): it enters through the Bergman Hilbert/Riesz structure and the orthogonal projection. No full Axiom of Choice is used.
For a nonempty open , is a closed complex Hilbert subspace of for the first-variable-linear pairing, each class has a unique holomorphic representative, point evaluation has a unique Riesz section with , and (The Bergman space and the Bergman kernel, is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).
For a bounded domain , , the diagonal is smooth with , and is holomorphic in its first and antiholomorphic in its second variable (Smoothness of the Bergman kernel and positivity of its diagonal on bounded domains, is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).
For every nonempty compact there are finite constants with and for every multi-index (Sup-norm and first-derivative bounds by the norm on compact subsets).
Every bounded linear functional on a real or complex Hilbert space has a unique representing vector, isometrically; in the first-variable-linear convention (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
A closed linear subspace of a Hilbert space satisfies uniquely, and the orthogonal projection onto is defined by that decomposition (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace).
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent pairs (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
If real functions satisfy near with , then for every (The complex Hessian of a function dominates that of a minorant at a common minimum).
The Bergman metric form is the Levi form of , and for the one-based coordinate aliases (The Bergman metric form on a bounded domain, The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).
Wirtinger operators are , , for holomorphic functions the real-coordinate derivative identities in [F12] give , real mixed partials commute by Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives, for by The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, and the product and chain rules hold for these first-order operators (Wirtinger operators in , Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
A holomorphic map is complex differentiable with complex-linear derivative , the chain rule holds (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of , Holomorphic maps and the complex Jacobian matrix, The composite of holomorphic maps is holomorphic and its complex Jacobian is the product).
A biholomorphism satisfies with , and is a unitary isomorphism (Transformation law of the Bergman kernel under a biholomorphism).
A holomorphic function on an open set is of class in the real coordinates for every natural , hence smooth (Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic).
The complex plane is complete, hence Banach for its modulus norm. A continuous differentiable complex-valued curve whose derivative is bounded by changes by at most times the parameter distance (The complex plane is complete, and convergence is equivalent to convergence of real and imaginary parts, Mean value inequality for a differentiable Banach-valued curve).
Proof
Given: , the bounded domain , a point , and a direction .
Put . By [F2], , so and the subspace is closed; by [F5], . By [F3] with the singleton the evaluation is bounded on and hence on for every ; [F4] gives a unique with for all . Define .
By [F5] the projection of onto is , and by [F1]. Hence, pointwise in , , and reproducing on gives By [F2] the function is on ; by [F6] it satisfies with , and for , since then some coordinate satisfies and the bounded function lies in with nonzero value at .
Compute the Levi form of . Write and , so that , and , and is near . Set and . Since is holomorphic in the first and antiholomorphic in the second variable [F2, F9], the Wirtinger derivatives and vanish identically, and the product and chain rules give , , , , and ; consequently , , and Since , the same rules applied to give , so ; summing against and using [F8] yields
Let with . By [F6] and the reproducing identity of step 1.1, for every , with equality at . Both and are : was shown in step 1.2, and is holomorphic, hence smooth in the real coordinates by [F12]. So [F7] gives ; hence .
Fix and such that for real . Set . The explicit formula in step 1.2 makes smooth, with . Differentiating that formula gives , where by step 1.3. Put . For every , continuity makes on a small rectangle about . Since and , applying [F13] first to and then to yields . Thus as both nonzero real parameters tend to , and in particular .
Assume . The function is holomorphic on and bounded there because is bounded, so ; also . Applying step 2.1 to gives for . Hence by step 1.3, : the quadratic form of is positive on every nonzero vector, so the Hermitian form is positive definite.
For real put . Reproduction gives , so step 2.2 implies as . Choose, for example, . The closed subspace is complete by [F1, F5], so ; the same Cauchy estimate gives for all real . By step 2.2, . For every , continuity of the pairing and holomorphic differentiability give . Hence represents the derivative functional, and Cauchy–Schwarz gives , attained at because by step 3.1.
Combining steps 1.3, 2.1 and 4.1 yields , which is the displayed formula, with the supremum attained; step 3.1 gives its strict positivity for . This proves the two assertions of part 1.
For part 2, let be a biholomorphism, , and let be the unitary isomorphism of [F11], so that maps the closed unit ball of onto that of and onto (because ). If , then the product rule and [F10] give , and for the second term vanishes; hence the supremum identity of part 1 applied on both domains, together with the diagonal kernel law from [F11], gives Since and , dividing by the positive number yields for every nonzero ; when , both quadratic forms are zero by definition.
The quadratic forms of the Hermitian forms agree under the complex-linear map . For all , applying step 6.1 to the four directions and using complex linearity of plus the polarization identity for the quadratic form gives .
Remarks
The supremum in part 1 is taken over all of with the single constraint ; since , this is exactly the closed subspace of the proof. In the orthonormal-system proof of the source, the reduced kernel of plays the role of the element of step 4.1. The constant hidden in the formula is carried by ; the Bergman metric is normalized so that on the disc at the origin one obtains .
The determinant quotient is a biholomorphic invariant
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be bounded domains, let be a biholomorphism with complex Jacobian , and let be the matrix of the Bergman metric form in the one-based coordinate aliases of The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity. Then, for every ,
and consequently
If each quotient is constant on its domain, then the two constants are equal. (For these quotients are the invariants that distinguish the ball metric from the polydisc metric, but constancy is not claimed here.)
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice assumption is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), inherited through the Bergman metric, kernel and transformation suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is used.
The Bergman metric form of a bounded domain is the Hermitian form with matrix , and (The Bergman metric form on a bounded domain, The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).
A biholomorphism of bounded domains satisfies for all (The Bergman metric is positive definite on bounded domains and biholomorphically invariant).
A biholomorphism satisfies with ; in particular the diagonal kernel law holds (Transformation law of the Bergman kernel under a biholomorphism).
On a bounded domain, for every (Smoothness of the Bergman kernel and positivity of its diagonal on bounded domains).
For over a commutative ring, , and transposition leaves the determinant unchanged; the determinant is multiplicative: (For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, Finite rectangular matrices over a commutative ring, their entries, rows and columns, For every square matrix over a commutative ring, , For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, ).
Complex conjugation is a field automorphism of fixing the rationals, so it commutes with finite sums and products of complex numbers (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Matrices multiply by the usual row-column rule, and has entries (Entrywise ring-matrix operations, rectangular matrix products, identity matrices and transpose, Finite rectangular matrices over a commutative ring, their entries, rows and columns).
Proof
Given: , bounded domains , a biholomorphism , a point , and .
Put and , with entries and in the one-based aliases. By [F1] and [F2], for all , Since the Hermitian form is determined by its coefficients, , which is the entry of because by [F7]; in matrix notation .
Conjugation is a field automorphism of [F6] applied entrywise to the Leibniz sum of [F5] gives ; since transposition leaves determinants unchanged [F5], .
Taking determinants in the matrix identity of step 1.1 and using multiplicativity and transposition invariance [F5] gives , the first displayed identity. The second displayed identity is the diagonal kernel law of [F3] with , whose determinant is nonzero.
By [F4] the diagonal values and are positive, and by [F3]; dividing the two identities of step 2.1 by each other and cancelling the common positive factor gives the displayed identity of the quotients for every . If each quotient is constant on its domain, evaluating the identity at any shows the two constants are equal.
Determinants and kernel quotients of the model Bergman metrics
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), let , and use the one-based coordinate aliases of The Bergman metric form on a bounded domain. For the unit ball and the unit polydisc in ,
Consequently the invariant quotients are the constants
and these constants are distinct for every .
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice assumption is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), inherited through the Bergman metric, kernel and determinant suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is used.
The model kernels are and (Bergman kernels of the disc, ball and polydisc, and Szegő kernels of the disc and ball).
The Bergman metric form is , its matrix has entries , and is real on a bounded domain (The Bergman metric form on a bounded domain, Smoothness of the Bergman kernel and positivity of its diagonal on bounded domains).
For , , and the usual product, quotient and chain rules hold; Wirtinger operators are the first-order operators of Wirtinger operators in (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm, The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Under the complex Euclidean dictionary, , and for these first-order operators (Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary, Wirtinger operators in ).
For a commutative ring, and columns , ; the adjugate is the transpose of the cofactor matrix, and a diagonal matrix has determinant the product of its diagonal entries (For and columns over a commutative ring, , Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring, The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries).
For with , each diagonal cofactor equals , including the empty minor when . If , deleting row and column leaves the original row present but zero, so its determinant is zero by the Leibniz formula. Thus (Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring, For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries).
The invariant quotient agrees under biholomorphisms, and diagonal kernel values are positive on bounded domains (The determinant quotient is a biholomorphic invariant, Smoothness of the Bergman kernel and positivity of its diagonal on bounded domains).
Factorials of naturals are positive and (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
In the Leibniz determinant formula every term contains exactly matrix entries, so for a complex scalar (For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix).
Proof
Given: , , the unit ball and the unit polydisc with the model kernels of [F1], and in the respective domain.
By [F1], . Using [F3] and [F4], and hence ; in matrix form , where has entries .
By [F1], . Each summand depends only on its own coordinate, so [F3] and [F4] give for and ; the matrix is diagonal, and [F5] gives , the second displayed determinant.
Put and . By [F6], , so the rank-one update [F5] with , gives Taking determinants in step 1.1 with [F9] therefore gives , the first displayed determinant.
Dividing by the model kernel diagonals of [F1] cancels the and coordinate factors and gives and ; the divisions use the positive diagonal values, and by [F7] the quotients are the biholomorphic invariants of the two domains.
It remains to compare the two constants. Their quotient is , a product of positive real factors. Pair the factor with the factor ; the pair contributes , because , with strict inequality unless . If is even, every one of the pairs has strict inequality, so the product exceeds . If is odd, the middle factor contributes while the pair with contributes for , so again the product exceeds . Hence for every , and the two invariant constants are distinct.
Poincaré's theorem: the ball and the polydisc are not biholomorphic for
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For every the unit ball and the unit polydisc in are not biholomorphic. (For both are the unit disc.)
Facts & Assumptions
The only choice assumption is (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), inherited through the Bergman metric, kernel and determinant suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is used.
The unit ball and unit polydisc are and ; for both equal the unit disc (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ).
A biholomorphism is a bijective holomorphic map whose inverse is holomorphic, and the determinant quotient satisfies for every ; if each quotient is constant on its domain, the two constants are equal (Biholomorphic maps between open sets in , The determinant quotient is a biholomorphic invariant).
The model quotients are the constants and , and these constants are distinct for every (Determinants and kernel quotients of the model Bergman metrics).
Proof
Given: and an integer .
Suppose, for contradiction, that is a biholomorphism. Both domains are bounded, so [F2] applies and gives for every . By [F3] the left-hand side is the constant and the right-hand side the constant ; hence, by the constant-quotient clause of [F2], the two constants are equal.
However, [F3] states that for every . This contradicts step 1.1, so no biholomorphism exists; the same argument applies to a biholomorphism in either direction, by symmetry of the biholomorphism relation.
For , [F1] gives , so the two domains coincide; this is why the theorem is stated for only, and no inequivalence is asserted in dimension one.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.