Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The multinomial theorem for finitely many complex variables

Statement

Let m,n∈N, let W(n,m) and (nα) be as in The multinomial coefficient (nk0,…,km−1) as the number of ordered partitions of an n-set into blocks of prescribed sizes, and let z0,…,zm−1∈C. Write ιC:N→C for the canonical natural of The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field. Then

(∑i<mzi)n=∑α∈W(n,m)ιC ⁣((nα))∏i<mziαi.

For every α∈W(n,m), the same coefficient satisfies ιC ⁣((nα))∏i<mιC(αi!)=ιC(n!). The sum on the right is the finite sum in the additive commutative monoid of C; the statement includes m=0 and n=0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

For x,y∈C and j∈N, (x+y)j=∑k≤jιC ⁣((jk))xkyj−k (The binomial theorem over the complex field).

[F4]
[F5]

Multiplication in N cancels a common nonzero factor (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).

[F6]

The canonical natural ιC is defined by ιC(0)=0 and ιC(j+1)=ιC(j)+1; complex integer powers use z0=1 and zj+1=zjz (The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field, Integer powers in the complex field).

[F8]

The natural operations satisfy a+0=a, a+(j+1)=(a+j)+1, a⋅0=0, and a⋅(j+1)=a⋅j+a (Addition of natural numbers, Multiplication of natural numbers).

[F9]

Complex field arithmetic is associative and distributive, and integer powers of nonzero elements obey the usual exponent laws (C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2), Laws of integer exponents).

[F10]

Induction on N is valid (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · induction on the number of variables, with the complex binomial theorem in the inductive step

Given: Naturals m,n, the finite index set W(n,m), and complex numbers zi for i<m.

1.1F3F6F7F8F9F10given

The canonical natural preserves addition and multiplication in C. For fixed a∈N, induction [F10] on b proves ιC(a+b)=ιC(a)+ιC(b): the base case uses a+0=a, and the successor case uses a+(b+1)=(a+b)+1 and the recursion in [F6]. A second induction on b proves ιC(ab)=ιC(a)ιC(b): at b=0 both sides are 0, and at the successor use a(b+1)=ab+a, the first identity, and distributivity in [F9]. Also ιC(1)=1. Applying [F3] and the multiplicative property just proved successively along the finite product recursion [F7] gives the coefficient identity in the statement.

1.2F1F6given

For m=0, the left side is 0n. If n=0, both sides equal 1: the right side has the single empty tuple, coefficient (00)=1, and empty product 1. If n≥1, the right side is an empty sum and the left side is 0; this proves the formula in dimension zero.

1.3ih

Fix m and assume the formula holds for this dimension for every exponent j∈N and every m-tuple of complex numbers.

2.1F2F7step 1.3given

Let z0,…,zm∈C, put S=∑i<mzi, and fix n∈N. The complex binomial theorem [F2], followed by the induction hypothesis [step 1.3] for each j≤n, expands (S+zm)n as the finite double sum over 0≤j≤n and β∈W(j,m) whose summand is ιC ⁣((nj))ιC ⁣((jβ))(∏i<mziβi)zm n−j.

3.1F1F3F4F5F6F7F9step 1.1step 2.1

For every pair (j,β) in step 2.1, let α=(β0,…,βm−1,n−j)∈W(n,m+1). This is a bijection from the pair index set to W(n,m+1): its inverse takes the first m coordinates as β and their natural sum as j. Put P=(∏i<mβi!)(n−j)!. By [F3], (nα)P=n!; also [F3] gives (jβ)∏i<mβi!=j!, so (nj)(jβ)P=(nj) j! (n−j)!=n!. The factor P is nonzero, since (nα)P=n!≠0 by [F4]; hence [F5] gives (nα)=(nj)(jβ). Step 1.1 carries this identity to the canonical naturals in C, and the power laws [F6], [F9] identify the accompanying monomial with ∏i<m+1ziαi.

4.1F1F3F6F7F10step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1discharge-induction∎

Reindex the finite double sum of step 2.1 along the bijection in step 3.1. Its coefficients and monomials become exactly those in the asserted formula for m+1 variables. The base case step 1.2 and this inductive step prove the statement for every m by [F7] and induction. If all variables are zero and n>0, every α∈W(n,m) has a positive coordinate, so every monomial on the right vanishes; if n=0, step 1.2 checks 00=1. For m=1, the sole index is (n) and its multinomial coefficient is 1 by the coloring definition, so the formula reduces to z0n=z0n.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources